>>2934878
>Your alternative is to rent an apartment because everything that isn't HOA is bought up and converted to apartments.
The US is enormous so there are many alternatives. like a used single wide on the largest lot one can manage.
Cities are bad so I do not live in one.
Coastal areas and those near fast-moving water, in floodways and flood plains are bad so I don't live in one.
Neighbors are not useful so I require sufficient acreage that I don't have to interact with mine.
Acreage zoned agricultural is good because freedom. It's easy to add structures but hard to build more land. I've a five acre minimum requirement for comfy shooting, wrenching and doing as I please. The old small home on it needed work but because it's a single storey ranch that was easy.
Otherwise I'd have slapped a single-wide on the property, built my workshops then built a small cottage (the larger a house is the greater the burden) or container home (which after doing container shops and a Steelmaster welding shop/garage would be easy and my first choice if my existing home were destroyed).
>>2934911
>it lowers property values in the area
GOOD. I bought my land to live in not as investment property. I don't need to cash out to retire then burn money relocating to the environment I prefer because I already live there and had decades to build and equip as serves ME.
I paid my property off early so I could enjoy it decades before retiring without economic vulnerabilities. The point of working is one day not to work, not to labor unto death for a gilded cage. I want values to stay as low as possible which lets me keep more of my precious money.
Low property lower my taxes. I live INSIDE my home not on the lawn so esthetics aren't worth paying for. They do not make my life better. I grew up in what's now near a million dollar house. I left the area long ago because I have no use for the taxes which were $10K/year in 2000 and why my father sold it.