>>2940473
>Would it be better to put the tubing inside the house for my use for better efficiency, or should I do it in a different way?
Decidedly not. You have to do the exact same thing he did, regardless of cooling or heating.
The important thing is not which side is hot or cold, but the deltaT the heat exchange works against. When it's 20C(heated) inside and 0C outside, deltaT is 20. When it's 20C(cooled) inside and 40C outside, deltaT is 20. When it's 20C inside(heated) and 10C in the ground, deltaT is 10. When it's 20C inside (cooled) and 10C in the ground, deltaT is -10. The lower number your deltaT is, the better the efficiency of any given heat pump. That -10 deltaT is why they had such a retardedly high efficiency in the video. There are more factors at play, but generally this is true for any heat pump.
Then as for where the pipe and where the air goes, that relates to the heat transfer efficiency from the internal refrigerant to the outside/inside environment. His pipe loop both improved the deltaT and the heat transfer ability of the radiator on the outside, but on the inside, the radiator is already good enough. This is explained in
https://rentry.co/heatshit#system-design-principles and the same principles as a2w apply here, just on the opposite side of the heat pump (e.g. sizing the tubing and designing flowrate for carrying X amount of heat from the heat exchanger).
>>2940672
Your greatest performance fight would be heat accumulation. After some time, the ground, which acts as a thermal insulator more than not, will accumulate a bunch of heat (or lose a bunch of heat, whichever you are doing) and if you laid your pipes like he did, into a single small hole, you will heat or cool the ground so much that you lose significant COP. His layout is fine for a tiny AC that sees occasional use, but if you were to cool a house, you'd need to dig large trenches and lay the lines over a large area, such that the energy accumulation/loss doesn't wreck your COP.