>>76469965
>generally smaller women generally want to look up at someone
Do you understand why?
>if you take a moment to walk around outside
This is a strawman. It also implies that the examples of couples with shorter men somehow disprove evolution and human sexual preselection.
Animals of sexual species are hardwired to detect specific traits in the opposite sex which have historically maximized reproductive success throughout evolution.
The males of nearly every animal species are hardwired to detect FERTILITY CUES in women, since not every woman can effectively get pregnant and bear children in every circumstance.
For example, male gorillas are sexually aroused at the sight and smell of female pussy glands during their ovulation, because they directly signal fertility.
On the other hand, the females of every animal species have evolved to detect DOMINANCE CUES, since mating dominant men historically led to better protection, provisioning, and above all- security.
'Mate Guarding' refers to the evolved phenomenon across all animal species where males fight over mates, and are possessive over them. If a woman mates with a non-powerful man, it's a massive risk and evolutionarily unfavorable.
When I say the word 'dominance', I'm not referring to sex or BDSM. I'm referring to the biological state of being the most powerful individual among your peers.
Women have evolved to scan for dominance, which include strength, size, and controlled demeanor.
Height isn't just a cultural fetish, it is an evolutionary sexual preselection development that all human women possess to subconsciously protect themselves and their children from danger.
Size IS strength, size IS height, and size IS saftey.
Even if that isn't true in modern society, the evolutionary framework is instilled in the mind of every woman alive due to the thousands of years they faced those issues.
