>>76486861 (OP)
Of course it is. But if you're worried about it, it's never going to happen. It's like the millions of women worried that if they lift a dumbbell heavier than 2lbs once that they'll suddenly look like Chris Bumstead.
>>76488977
There's no point in asking whether some person is natty or not. Whether something is achievable naturally differs between people, same with where you can get with gear.
>>76486861 (OP) >hoomams inflate or deflate like a baloon >their shape is predetermined by gemnaticism
bullshit bot, this unfortunate build is 100% result of squatting >>76486629 >>76486664
>>76488977
He has a great physique that is achievable natty but he is not running and not swimming and this makes him sus. If he was running, swimming, biking regularly I would say he is 100 natty but he doesn't (treadmill and step master don't count, they are fake cardio) so he could be a fake natty.