← Home ← Back to /g/

Thread 105577221

15 posts 8 images /g/
Anonymous No.105577221 [Report] >>105577280 >>105577296 >>105577977
Is it the beginning of the end for Apple?
They have no good AI and keep releasing research papers trying to pretend like AI is overhyped.
Anonymous No.105577235 [Report]
>AI
Apple Iphone
Anonymous No.105577280 [Report] >>105577307
>>105577221 (OP)
>They have no good AI and keep releasing research papers trying to pretend like AI is overhyped

AI is extremely over-hyped and its economic impact has been a rounding error at best.
https://www.nber.org/papers/w33777

The picture you posted is related to their new interface design, which is fucking terrible.
Quite the disingenuous little cocksucker, aren't you?
Anonymous No.105577293 [Report]
they insist on making their own AI in house instead of just buying up a company and having them develop it with unlimited funds
Tim Apple is retarded
Anonymous No.105577296 [Report]
>>105577221 (OP)
>Is it the beginning of the end for Apple?
As if Jews would let one of their megacorps die
Anonymous No.105577307 [Report] >>105577369
>>105577280
>Quite the disingenuous little cocksucker
Not at all, peep the filename

AI skeptics are retarded
Anonymous No.105577331 [Report] >>105577352 >>105577977
OP is a faggot.
AI is overhyped and Apple is the one based company for saying it (+ ending the flatshit era)
Anonymous No.105577352 [Report]
>>105577331
No, this doesn't end the flatshit anything. People used to follow their trends because they were successful, this new interface will need to be worked on before it establishes any trends.
AI is extremely overhyped, though.
Anonymous No.105577369 [Report] >>105577425
>>105577307
No, you're a dumb cunt who fell for the hype. "Peep" the study, dipshit.

>despite substantial investments, economic impacts remain minimal. Using difference-in-differences and employer policies as quasi-experimental variation, we estimate precise zeros: AI chatbots have had no significant impact on earnings or recorded hours in any occupation, with confidence intervals ruling out effects larger than 1%. Modest productivity gains (average time savings of 3%), combined with weak wage pass-through, help explain these limited labor market effects.
Anonymous No.105577425 [Report] >>105577461 >>105577977
>>105577369
LMAO using a 2023 CHATBOT STUDY in 2025 to say AI's "overhyped"?
Absolute smooth-brain take.

Study's OBSOLETE. We had GPT-4 Turbo, Claude 3, Gemini 1.5, Llama 3, SD3 since then, Gemini 2.5, Claude 4, O3, etc etc.

"No economic impact"? Tell that to:

Devs getting 55% faster with Copilot

NVIDIA printing $2.3 TRILLION

Hollywood replacing artists w/ AI tools

Pharma curing shit w/ AlphaFold 3


You're malding over textboxes while actual AGI labs are cooking
Anonymous No.105577461 [Report] >>105577482 >>105577482
>>105577425
go back
Anonymous No.105577482 [Report] >>105577977
>>105577461
>>105577461
>go back
>Says the NPC regurgitating a 2-YEAR OLD STUDY like it’s gospel
Anonymous No.105577595 [Report]
please!!! please please PLEASE worship AI!!!! don't ask for sources and citations goddamnit!!!! i-i-i-i need this nononoNOOOOOOOOOO DADDY HELP ME!!!
Anonymous No.105577977 [Report]
>>105577221 (OP)
>Is it the beginning of the end for Apple?
yes

>>105577331
retarded

>>105577425
>>105577482
> snake oil from a fucking idiot
nice. two more weeks, everyone. talentless pedophiles advertising memeshit for free are going to be the new rulers of the tech world. can't wait.
Anonymous No.105577982 [Report]
liquid ASS