>>105596938
>disagreeing with each other over... how gays should be.
no. they're disagreeing on sociopolitical conduct within the context of sexuality, but not who gets to call themselves gay and who doesn't. each faction will tell you that gay people who disagree with them are still categorically gay, just gay and retarded.
>>105596941
you didn't explicitly use the word "contradict" at any point but your juxtaposition of those two statements heavily implies an intent to highlight some conflict between them.
>>105596953
>Here: "I don't eat meat, eggs and dairy"
that's veganism. you're describing veganism. veganism is not eating meat, eggs or dairy. "I'm not human, I'm Homo sapiens."
>Problem is that words lose their meaning over time, vegan for example being associated with the preachy type, people already expect you to act like that if you use the label
but that's literally not what the word means though. you can be a vegan and not "act" like how they're generally expected to act.
>Lgbt propaganda is behavior standards anon
no, they're not. it's advocacy, not a particular set of rules for gay people to follow.
>A lot of things is pushed along with the lgbt ideology, like totally unrelated democrat stuff
yeah, no you've said that before, but you haven't explained how adding an optional signifier of support for queer people is inherently predatory. there's a difference.
>It's like enjoying chocolate but only the fine kind, then you can't find it among the slop that's produced for money and you are supposed to be happy because you like chocolate
you are REALLY bad at presenting analogies.
1.) all chocolate that is produced on a commercial level is produced for money regardless of quality, that doesn't make any sense.
2.) the lgbt flag is literally just a signifier of support for gay rights. that's literally it. there's nothing selective about it.
3.) what the fuck are you talking about anymore
