>>105595572 (OP)They can't. Without Xorg they have a badly designed DE that can run like 3 applications total. Everything application that matters either requires Xorg or runs better in Xorg. They will be forced to maintain Xorg for the next several decades because there is no reason to switch to UNIX desktop without it and no large company that's been using UNIX for years already will tolerate losing access to decades worth of applications that their business depends on.
A "wayland only" desktop would be basically whatever crap comes with modern Gnome. So you're looking at a desktop worse than what Windows 3.11 shipped with. Running your Xorg shit through "Xwayland" is retarded as well because you're putting yet another layer of shit you don't need between yourself and the applications you actually want to run. Which requires debugging more garbage and dealing with it breaking every 6 months because these idiots can't design or decide what is and isn't in their "protocol".
They also pretend like things can't work the other way. If you actually want a wayland application you can always just run it under a DE/WM running on top of Xorg. It will work better than it will on native wayland and will be less trouble to maintain in the long run. It also allows you to do things like not having dbus installed on the system. At worse it'll spam some errors to /dev/null or you'll just have to fake it running to make the application work. Which is what most sane ports of Firefox and Libreoffice have been doing for years.
