← Home ← Back to /g/

Thread 105601998

17 posts 6 images /g/
Anonymous No.105601998 >>105602185 >>105603949 >>105604002 >>105604020 >>105604209 >>105604422 >>105604516 >>105604667
what's the BULL of distros? like the one that benefits from open-source ecosystem fully but contributes back nothing. yet the one that people like to use the most?
Anonymous No.105602185 >>105604002
>>105601998 (OP)
Gnome
Anonymous No.105602286 >>105604002
Mint
Anonymous No.105603949 >>105604002
>>105601998 (OP)
That would be Arch, I'm not kidding.
Anonymous No.105604002 >>105604940
>>105602185
>>105602286
>>105603949
you are all wrong
>>105601998 (OP)
Windows. WSLg 1 and 2
Anonymous No.105604020 >>105604083
>>105601998 (OP)
Community Fedora Spins.
Anonymous No.105604083 >>105604095
>>105604020
That's like saying that Debian with GNOME, KDE or XFCE isn't contributing either for making an ISO with such packages pre-installed.
Both Debian and Fedora contribute a lot to open source.
Anonymous No.105604095 >>105604124
>>105604083
They only contribute in further fragmentation which is detrimental if overdone.
Anonymous No.105604124
>>105604095
Anon asked for a distro that DOES NOT CONTRIBUTE back to open source, Debian and Fedora do. So that's about it. You don't like their contributions, that's a another topic.
Anonymous No.105604154
Sony/Nintendo have been forking FreeBSD for years and contributed nothing to it thanks to the cuck license
Anonymous No.105604209 >>105604940
>>105601998 (OP)
>MacOS
they took full advantage of BSD's cuck license
Anonymous No.105604422
>>105601998 (OP)
Anything using BSD license.
Anonymous No.105604516
>>105601998 (OP)
>what's the BULL of distros?
GNU
Anonymous No.105604667 >>105604681
>>105601998 (OP)
RHEL
Anonymous No.105604681 >>105604765
>>105604667
In fact, that is not true.
Anonymous No.105604765
>>105604681
Why not?
Anonymous No.105604940
>>105604209
no way, they contribute back webkit and clang.

>>105604002
vscode, .net core