← Home ← Back to /g/

Thread 105622691

38 posts 12 images /g/
Anonymous No.105622691 >>105622708 >>105622721 >>105622733 >>105622777 >>105622780 >>105622802 >>105622850 >>105622869 >>105622926 >>105622942 >>105622943 >>105624679 >>105624758 >>105624775 >>105625764 >>105625788 >>105625970 >>105626182 >>105626252 >>105626440 >>105626598 >>105626626
>Ubuntu pushes Snaps
>Mint can't into Wayland
>Fedora has no Codecs
>Debian has no updates
>Arch has no installer
There are millions of Linux distros. Why isn't there a single one that's good for beginners?

Base it on Debian, the de facto Linux standard.
Cut the freetard crap and ship the proprietary codecs and drivers everyone needs anyway out of the box.
Make KDE default.
Let users install it by clicking "Next".
Publish a major release once every 2 years, with software version upgrades twice a year.
Ship it with Firefox, Thunderbird and LibreOffice.
Don't give it a retarded name. Avoid naming it after cartoons or animals.
Don't do whatever OpenSUSE is doing with their package management.
Boom, instant 70% Linux market share! Was that so hard?
Anonymous No.105622708 >>105622723 >>105622797
>>105622691 (OP)
KDE sucks. XFCE is superior.
Anonymous No.105622721
>>105622691 (OP)
Install Gentoo. That, or learn LFS.
Alternatively the best thing you'll get out of the box with low maintenance is Debian.
>Arch has no installer
Use Artix then.
Anonymous No.105622723
>>105622708
/thread
Anonymous No.105622733 >>105622782
>>105622691 (OP)
Mint is good for beginners. you don't need Wayland.
Anonymous No.105622737 >>105622760
Archinstall is pretty easy but their is a nasty bug with the time provider
Anonymous No.105622760
>>105622737
Amazing how those fags can't fix basic install script for few years... How was that shit even accepted in the main repo.
Anonymous No.105622777
>>105622691 (OP)
Rebecca spending time on her code of conduct and Baljeet shitting up the code are the reasons why Linux distributions will never recieve mainstream acceptance
Anonymous No.105622780
>>105622691 (OP)
>Why isn't there a single one that's good for beginners?
There comes a certain point where it is a genuine skill issue. Some of you fucks were simply not built for this. And that's okay. I just don't get why you all don't want to admit it.
Anonymous No.105622782
>>105622733
You only "need" air, water, porridge and warmth.
But exposing newbs to X11 is just cruel.
Anonymous No.105622788
there's always freebsd.
Anonymous No.105622797
>>105622708
Xfeces scares women.
Anonymous No.105622802 >>105622896
>>105622691 (OP)
>Why isn't there a single one that's good for lazy ass mofos who refuse to learn new skills now that they graduated from high school and want everything serve on a plate, for free.
ftfy
you don't want a "beginner"-friendly distro otherwise you would use any of the distro in your list but you refuse because it involves EFFORTS on your part.
>Boom, instant 70% Linux market share!
927
>Was that so hard?
talk is cheap, do it, we all know you won't because what you actually want is macos, buy a fucking mac mini and move on with your life.
Anonymous No.105622850 >>105623251 >>105626221
>>105622691 (OP)
the best format is Fedora's. 2 releases a year and very up to date packages with enough room for testing that its not a rolling release.

Fedora needs to enable all rpmfusion repos by default, add a step in the installer to configure dnf.conf for max parallel downloads and fastest mirror selection, also include ffmpeg codecs non free with the install (not even as an option in the installer but by default).

If fedora did this they'd be a newb friendly distro and could attract more users but its freetard philosophy prevents it from doing this.
Anonymous No.105622869
>>105622691 (OP)
>Mint can't into wayland
That's not a beginner issue anon, almost nothing you have talked about makes any sense to someone just looking to install Mint and use a functional computer which is what Mint is designed for and what it does.
Anonymous No.105622896 >>105622922 >>105622938
>>105622802
It's not about what I want. I daily drive Debian.
But if your OS requires EFFORTS, you've already lost 98% of all users.
Anonymous No.105622922
>>105622896
>But if your OS requires EFFORTS, you've already lost 98% of all users.
and that's supposed to be a bad thing?
I will never understand this obsession with marketshare...
Anonymous No.105622926 >>105624206
>>105622691 (OP)
>too many contrarian trannys
>too few profit incentives

Plebs need to accept the fact that standardization can only be achieved by us big brained economists. We are capable of adopting solutions that produce the largest benefit to the most amount of people. Narcissist tranny code monkeys are not.
Anonymous No.105622938
>>105622896
>But if your OS requires EFFORTS-
Many "average" Windows users willingly put up with a lot of bullshit.
Anonymous No.105622942
>>105622691 (OP)
>Fedora has no Codecs
my Fedora 42 had codecs for everything except HEVC by default
Anonymous No.105622943
>>105622691 (OP)
Step1: Install RedHat Enterprise Linux
Was that so hard?
Anonymous No.105623251 >>105623306
>>105622850
also stop crashing all the time.
buggiest distro after Ubuntu.
Anonymous No.105623306
>>105623251
works on my machine
Anonymous No.105624206
>>105622926
>Narcissist tranny code monkeys are not.
obsessed
Anonymous No.105624679
>>105622691 (OP)
>>Arch has no installer
Fake news
Anonymous No.105624758
>>105622691 (OP)
That's Sparky Linux. Fairly niche but is technically what you're asking for. It's up to you if the name is retarded or not. There're military equipment with worse names IMHO.
Anonymous No.105624775
>>105622691 (OP)
>Fedora has no Codecs
ever heard of rpmfusion retard ?
Anonymous No.105625764
>>105622691 (OP)
ah yes, the solution to all the different linux distros is another distro. op is a genius.
Anonymous No.105625788 >>105625855
>>105622691 (OP)
>debian has no updates
??? i just updated my debian last month
Anonymous No.105625855
>>105625788
>i just updated my debian last month
How's firefox v1.01 treating you?
Anonymous No.105625970
>>105622691 (OP)
Sounds like you found yourself a good weekend project to work on, let us know how it goes.
Anonymous No.105626182
>>105622691 (OP)
There are several arch distros that have an installer.
Anonymous No.105626221
>>105622850
fedora also needs a better package manager than dnfdragora; I hate that shit.
fourzerofour !!SwXxo3XLf5d No.105626252
>>105622691 (OP)
Nice bait, anon.
Anonymous No.105626295
Debian KDE + Backports + Flatpak
Anonymous No.105626440
>>105622691 (OP)
>>Mint can't into Wayland
>>Debian has no updates
>>Arch has no installer
Those are all good things.
Anonymous No.105626598
>>105622691 (OP)
He was right.
Anonymous No.105626626
>>105622691 (OP)
>distrohopping
Come home, white man.