← Home ← Back to /g/

Thread 105634376

35 posts 22 images /g/
Anonymous No.105634376 >>105634417 >>105635291 >>105635327 >>105635437 >>105635710 >>105635716 >>105635770 >>105637750 >>105639748 >>105640465 >>105640787 >>105641827 >>105641856
Makes your life infinitely easier and enjoyable
/g/: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
Anonymous No.105634417
>>105634376 (OP)
>Makes your life infinitely easier and enjoyable
Pic unrelated?
Anonymous No.105634422 >>105634445
Anonymous No.105634445 >>105635663
>>105634422
Except the opposite is true, anytime /g/ gets a wiff of you using anything other than C they have a full BPD mental break down.
Anonymous No.105635291
>>105634376 (OP)
You enjoy getting fucked tracebacked?
Anonymous No.105635327 >>105635569 >>105641856
>>105634376 (OP)
>still no multi-line anonymous functions
No, thanks.
Anonymous No.105635437 >>105635710
>>105634376 (OP)
>/g/: loves C
>also /g/: hates software written in C
really makes you think.
Anonymous No.105635569 >>105635664
>>105635327
LMAO the expression is perfect, what is that meme from?

Also python is great for very small teams, but I wouldn't dream of letting a single jeet get involved, much more potential for damage than other languages.
Anonymous No.105635663 >>105639731
>>105634445
'ate pip
'ate cargo
'ate npm
'ate cpan
'ate quicklisp (not racist yeah, just don't like 'em is all)

luv me emerge
luv me nob.h

simple as
Anonymous No.105635664 >>105635759
>>105635569
It's from Naruto.
Anonymous No.105635710 >>105636591
>>105634376 (OP)
I hate being a coomsumer, I'd rather be the one to develop these tools than to use them.
>>105635437
almost as if /g/ and 4ch4n in general aren't as monolithic as what the average tard thinks...
truly tingles my massive balls
Anonymous No.105635716
>>105634376 (OP)
I work with a big corp program made in python: It's not comfy
Anonymous No.105635759 >>105635779
>>105635664
Anonymous No.105635770
>>105634376 (OP)
I just wished it wasn't based on indentation, and used brackets instead.
Like sometimes I want to choose how I want my code to look, not let the language decide.
Anonymous No.105635779
>>105635759
>save and repost pictures of naked men
>call others faggots
?
Anonymous No.105636591 >>105642108
>>105635710
Which iteration are you up to on your failed game engine.
How many centuries are you away from releasing an actual game?
Anonymous No.105637750 >>105640438
>>105634376 (OP)
Op here sorry guys I used the wrong image
Anonymous No.105639731
>>105635663
>'ate pip
Yeah, same.
>'ate cargo
Truly.
>'ate npm
Indeed.
>'ate cpan
Relying too much on CPAN is bad, yeah.
>'ate quicklisp (not racist yeah, just don't like 'em is all)
Woah, buddy, that was a step too much. TAKE THAT BACK! CL is not like those other shitlangs...
Anonymous No.105639748
>>105634376 (OP)
Bloated POS
Anonymous No.105640438 >>105640484 >>105642016
>>105637750
best language for a beginner!
Anonymous No.105640465
>>105634376 (OP)
>Makes your life infinitely easier and enjoyable
I quit my last job because Python was an incredibly retarded choice that added significant complexity compared to Golang and I hate golang, but the target was an esoteric out of life armv7l part.
this was around the time asyncio was also introduced and working with the eventloop in python is objectively ball busting hard compared to fully eventloop hosted languages like javascript.
The ultimate fuck you was the performance was extreme levels of dogshit so you had to lower to cython or C ABI targeting anyway, which also, added a fuckload complexity.

C++ is less autistic than this dogshit language unless you're only targeting some garbage full desktop system that's well managed or where "reproducibility" doesn't matter since you're racing to publish your bullshit doctorate thesis on shaky bullshit grounds like a faggot you are.

fuck you, fuck python and fuck /g/.
Anonymous No.105640484 >>105640689 >>105640941 >>105642016
>>105640438
jesus fucking christ perl cucks.
is it this bad?
Anonymous No.105640689 >>105641396
>>105640484
Yes. There's Modern::Perl wrapper for these but I doesn't work for older perl versions since it has a dumb year check so the above boilerplate is necessary.
Anonymous No.105640787
>>105634376 (OP)
Nice logo.
Anonymous No.105640941 >>105642176
>>105640484
It's worth mentioning that, unlike with C or C++ #include, those pragmas add no functionality to your program.
They are required in order to write valid Perl in 2025 simply because the Perl community is so bent on not breaking 35 year old code golf demos.
Anonymous No.105641396
>>105640689
2013 - the jewel of CPAN is DBIx::Class, a state-of-the-art ORM
2023 - pic related
Anonymous No.105641827 >>105641866
>>105634376 (OP)
>enjoyable

have you ever used an open-source py lib?
have you ever had to read docs of an open-source py lib?

its anything but enjoyable
Anonymous No.105641856 >>105641941
>>105635327
kek

>>105634376 (OP)
Python 3.14 will be fucking glorious
https://docs.python.org/3.14/whatsnew/3.14.html
- the GIL can be disabled at build time
- the JIT compiler can be enabled at runtime
- zero-overhead debugging
- `pdb` remote attaching
- using subinterpreters in the same process
- lazy evaluation of type annotations by default
Anonymous No.105641866 >>105641921
>>105641827
gib example
Anonymous No.105641921
>>105641866
two very recent examples:

- standard email lib has PR fixes that are open for 3+ years, no one gives a shit so you have to maintain your own version of the lib which beats the purpose of just import and use
- elasticsearch.dsl has functionality that isn't even documented, you need to read thousands of lines of code to figure out what exactly is happening, docs are utter shit
Anonymous No.105641941
>>105641856
>- lazy evaluation of type annotations by default
The news post as well as the original PEP are a bit short on this detail but am I right that I can then finally get rid of typing.Self on methods?
Don't care about the performance stuff (GIL/JIT) because I wouldn't use it where performance matters anyway. However, it's always a consideration for all the rest (which is most stuff).
Anonymous No.105642016 >>105642367
>>105640484
>>105640438
For warnings and features you use a version string like use 5.38.0 which leaves the two utf pragmas which is a grand total of 3 pragmas and that is only if you NEED utf-8. Do not fall for retarded troon propaganda
Anonymous No.105642108
>>105636591
>Which iteration are you up to on your failed game engine.
I contribute to linux mostly, I stopped writing userspace boringware a long time ago
>How many centuries are you away from releasing an actual game?
I'd rather kms than to work in game dev
Anonymous No.105642176
>>105640941
>They are required in order to write valid Perl in 2025 simply because the Perl community is so bent on not breaking 35 year old code golf demos.
And that's a Good Thingβ„’. It makes your script self-contained and forward-compatible with extremely few exceptions (i.e. you used shartmatch for some reason). With Python you end up dealing with venvs and pyenv and having to write fucking wrapper scripts for your script because EVERY new release of the language breaks multiple things.
Besides, you can just "use version" and get everything but the UTF-8 settings. Easy.
Anonymous No.105642367
>>105642016
>retarded troon propaganda
https://www.perl.com/article/announcing-perl-7/
>use 5.38.0 which leaves the two utf pragmas which is a grand total of 3 pragmas
pic related seems to disagree with you. although it's for 5.32, I bet my left testicle that it hasn't changed in any meaningful way for 5.38