>>105639845
>yeah but if you create those new models then AI intelligence would surpass our own.
llm can't produce intelligence.
>so it seems like the juice is worth the squeeze?
>j-j-j-just give me 7 trillions brooooos
>this 1 rocket exploding costs like $100M and surely the model would cost less than $100M to train.
and the next iteration will fly just fine, we don't need retarded chatbot for webdevs.
>>105639874
llm can't create
>>105639983
the only rational answer is doing both at the same time.
space r&d contributes so much to everyday life that it would be a mistake to cut funds for space programs.
>>105640368
>All the SpaceX missions are for Musk to pivot to monopolizing internet via satellites
only a fucking moron would do that as satelite internet will never beat fiber except during fucking war time maybe.
musk would be a trillionaire already if he had focused on building a rail network across the US
>>105642651
technology is lost as in people fucking retire/move on and manufacturers upgrade their tools so things can't be done the same way as before hence the need to start from scratch, as simple as.
tech is "lost" all the fucking time everywhere, if you had actually worked in a engineering dept you would know that, fucking retard.
>>105643718
manufacturing is foreign to most people in the service era, they don't understand how the supply-chain works and it's incredibly sad
