← Home ← Back to /g/

Thread 105654704

11 posts 16 images /g/
MikeeUSA No.105654704
I hate white people. They oppose loli brides. I want them to be killed for this.
>>>/pol/508055893
>Those laws were there to protect women
Wrong dipshit. It was to give value to money.
It made it always possible to use money for something you wanted: cute young girls.
Sumer had the same law 1000 years before: for the same reason.
>DURR IT WAS TO PROTECT WOMEN, SINCE WE PROTECT WOMEN DIFFERENTLY THAT LAW IS ONE WE DONT HAVE TO FOLLOW, FAGGOT!
I will kill you.

YHWH allows child brides.
MikeeUSA No.105654715
>>>/pol/508055297
>>>/pol/508055203
>I can't read alien writing.

It says if you rape little girl in her father's house, and she is not promised to someone else, you pay him some silver and keep her.

> >>>/pol/508055469 (You)
>and if you don't marry her you get stoned to death. Those laws were there to protect women because women have no rights and must be protected. It's a strange law in modern times but that's how things were, faggot.

Notice how the white dismisses the law:
>and if you don't marry her you get stoned to death.
Why does this "invalidate" the law?
Also it doesn't say that btw.

>Those laws were there to protect women because women have no rights and must be protected
Here you argue that the law "didn't mean what it says (man rapes little girl, keeps her)"
"it was just to protect women"

>It's a strange law in modern times but that's how things were, faggot.
Here you argue that since "modern times" has "better" ways to "protect women"
(killing pedos) (imprisonment) (police)
that you don't have to follow that law, and it's invalid and subsumed.

-----
I really hate white people. I want them dead
<----non white as you can see (me)


YHWH allows child brides.
whites do not.
Anonymous No.105654736 >>105654774 >>105654880
Erm, technology?
MikeeUSA No.105654737
YHWH explicitly allows child brides.
<------------------
MikeeUSA No.105654774
>>105654736
>Erm, technology?
Used every day to make you think the ancient world you had never existed.

>NO, IT PAIS DOESNT MEAN CHILD!! IT MEANS YOUNG, NO PAIDIA DOESNT MEAN CHILD IT MEANS YOUNG
>LOOK MY AI PROMPT AGREES WITH ME
>IF YOU POST DICTIONARIES FROM BEFORE 2020 YOU ARE A SKITZO
>FUCKING PAEDOPHILE!!!! (BTW ITS A DIFFERENT WORD, PAEDOPHILE ISNT THE WORD PAIDIA!!!!!! NOR PHILOS!!!! ITS A DIFFERENT WORD!!!! I WIN!!! ZOOMERS RULE MILLENIALS DROOL SKIZZOOO!!!

(pais, paidia, etc does indeed mean child)
<----
(and is used in YHWH's law, which is why zoomers are claiming these ancient greek words don't mean what they say: as they've successfully rewritten the english translations to not include mention of "minors")
MikeeUSA No.105654863
This law was not to "protect women".
It was to provide men with little girls.
And to provide money with a ready sop to invest in.

The man is called the ba'al (master, lord) in this law area. Men were not stoned to death for fucking girls. White christians are lying here.

Men were killed when they fucked other men's owned women/girls ("wives" (this term wasn't used)) that said men claimed. Those women were killed aswell.

When a man raped a little girl child that wasn't owned yet (and not "by her father": whites will try to parry with that) by another man: the man kept the girl and paid some money.

He didn't "Marry" her.
She didn't become his "wife".
These things didn't exist.
Nor was there a "husband" (caretaker).

There was man, master (ba'al), lord (adoni)
woman, girl.

No wife. No husband.
Whites changed the "bible" to talk of "wives" and "husbands" and "young women".

It's all lies.
Girls were not true virgins after first blood, rabinically.
They were "marrying" little girls then.
Whites do not like this.

Whites are lying woman worshiping scum.
And I am glad they are being summerally executed by the vaxx and WW3.


Money was invented in Sumer to buy girls.
MikeeUSA No.105654871
Anonymous No.105654880
>>105654736
children are technology
MikeeUSA No.105654890
Marry little girls.
Kill white people.
MikeeUSA No.105654901
MikeeUSA No.105654915