← Home ← Back to /g/

Thread 105661523

69 posts 10 images /g/
Anonymous No.105661523 >>105661541 >>105661544 >>105661551 >>105661723 >>105661881 >>105662035 >>105662108 >>105662117 >>105662192 >>105662346
c'est fini
slowly prepare for internet IDs everywhere eurofags
Anonymous No.105661541
>>105661523 (OP)
>France doesn't want preteens contacting OP
Le disgusting.
Anonymous No.105661544 >>105661642 >>105663025
>>105661523 (OP)
quality of 4chan might finally go up
Anonymous No.105661551 >>105661633 >>105661771 >>105661902
>>105661523 (OP)
>thinks the EU is a country
lamao
you americans are retarded

do you know i can import mate de coca in belgium?
did you know its forbidden by the EU for all its constituent states?
but its constituent states can just say "lol, no", and then its up to the EU courts.
which cant go against sovereignity anyways

the EU is like an old karen
she will do everything in her power to make your life miserable but this amounts to kvetching, blocking the traffic, and refusing to give you the lawnmower back
Anonymous No.105661633 >>105661705
>>105661551
>but its constituent states can just say "lol, no"
No, not all EU laws are the same.
Anonymous No.105661642
>>105661544
nafris are not in india though
Anonymous No.105661665
He's protecting them from casting, null pointers, and buffer overflows. He really is leading the Rust(r) charge.
Anonymous No.105661667 >>105661723 >>105662289
Alternative title:
Macron will have 15 years to indoctrinate children before they are allowed to read alternative points of view
Anonymous No.105661705
>>105661633
all eu laws are the same
the eu ratifies them
then its up to the countries to implement em
some never get implemented
like the mate de coca thing

if you talk about systemic things, poland was in the eu-commune crosshairs because we didnt bend to their meddling with how we select our judges something like 2 years ago

the eu understood that if they push too far we will nuke the eu's lawmaking abilities by judging the eu-diktat to be against the principle of sovereignity
which it is to its just a matter of pulling the trigger

like i said
the EU is an old, untouched karen that will do everything in her power to make your life miserable
but it actually doesnt amount to much.
just dont let her borrow your lawnmower
Anonymous No.105661716 >>105661728 >>105661753
did the public just roll over and accept? or was that why they had all those riots happen to distract them?
Anonymous No.105661723
>>105661523 (OP)
I like the idea of an "adults only" internet and a kids internet which is restricted to schoolwork / education.
But unfortunately it will be used for this >>105661667
Anonymous No.105661728 >>105661761
>>105661716
baguettes are pretty pozzed as things go
leftism is strong in that shithole
they prolly wouldnt mind, on average
Anonymous No.105661753
>>105661716
most people cheer this up because
>social media evil
>russian disinfo, andrew tate etc.
Anonymous No.105661761 >>105661792
>>105661728
they sure didn't mind turning one of the most beauitful countries in the world into Little North Africa. The west is dead.
Anonymous No.105661771 >>105661792
>>105661551
I hope europeans die in Ukraine soon
Anonymous No.105661792
>>105661771
>hate
rent free lamao
>>105661761
to be completely honest the west is dead since a good while
something something overfed animals and behavioral sinks
Anonymous No.105661832 >>105661875
This is one of the few areas of policy I'm conflicted about, whether it's in the UK or France.
I fucking adore the idea of getting teens off the internet because since the mid 00's the internet has been shat up with normalfags, sure, a few will suffer but on the whole the ratio of kool kids to social media addicted losers has skewed one way.

My problem then, is with implementation.
Because it always comes down to some half baked, authoritarian legislation with no actual verification scheme in place that doesn't cost adults to use.

So what I'm saying is that I agree with the concept of the bill, but more along the lines of removing limbs bit by bit from parents whose children are caught online. I'm endorsing responsible parenting over state intervention at the end point, by intervening early we can solve the issues and ensure that the child should have to support their limbless parents instead.
it's a good idea but sadly the ECHR prevents it from happening, so much like how in the UK they are campaigning to leave the ECHR, France too must do the same, all in service of removing the devil's tools.
Anonymous No.105661875
>>105661832
anon
in the mid-00's
we were the teens
here, let me remind you of the kind of shit we used to watch:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cDoo53YgQhY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RO7Q1tMGE7g
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vZMd_PSEuRk
Anonymous No.105661881
>>105661523 (OP)
>young girls forced onto less reputable sites to post their videos
Anonymous No.105661902 >>105661927
>>105661551
if it's totalitarian, oppressive, and involves surveillance you can be sure that as soon as one EU member state gets away with it, the rest will soon realise they can do the same
Anonymous No.105661927
>>105661902
>the rest will soon realise they can do the same
no
theres still countries within the eu where the state is checked by the population
usually its the less "civilized" countries although theres outliers
like jewcraine where you will just get murdered if you dont follow the kike propaganda
or belgioom which has a very strongly anti authoritarian population because of the horrors of the industrial revolution
Anonymous No.105661931 >>105661945 >>105661951
This is good actually.
Not because online ID is good but because it will kill social media.
Anonymous No.105661945 >>105661969
>>105661931
>it will kill social media.
lol
lmao even
boomers consume as much if not even more social media brainrot as the zoomies
Anonymous No.105661951
>>105661931
>oh no the kids are gone from social media
>well who cares we'll just have more bot posts to inflate our figures
>oh no the hebephiles (no, not that type of hebephile!) noticed and they're saying our networks are all bots
>ah well, we can just artificially inflate our figures with more bot posts and sell to the other hebephiles
ez as
Anonymous No.105661969 >>105661976 >>105661981
>>105661945
>boomers
They will all be dead by the time the law has realized in the real world.
Anonymous No.105661976 >>105662003
>>105661969
Thus im actually advocating for completely killing the big social media sites immediately and everybody so the whole world can enjoy a social media free world.
Anonymous No.105661981 >>105661993
>>105661969
and by then the zoomers will reach majority
i dont really care either way
its normalspace. social media dont concern me
Anonymous No.105661993 >>105662013 >>105662017 >>105662069
>>105661981
If you live IRL you are sadly forced to interact with normiespace. Even if you dont use it others do and spread its influence around.

Thus im actually advocating for completely killing the big social media sites immediately and for everybody so the whole world can enjoy a social media free world. Can you imagine how much better the world will be once its gone?
Anonymous No.105662003 >>105662067 >>105662150
>>105661976
why would you want to help retards?
if one doesnt have the self control to avoid being terminally online, not much should be expected of them

retards breed faster because they have no notion of responsibility because they cannot project into the future, or modelize the needs of a child
this makes more retards which acts as an exponantial positive feedback loop for the problem
and now that we made the world safe- we removed the natural mechanisms which maintained our populations in a healthy state
if things dont change fast, we will be outbred into extinction by the retards
Anonymous No.105662013 >>105662067
>>105661993
could you imagine the fallout? like easily half the population below age 40 would be completely lost. wait.. i have to cultivate interests, a personality, an image and identity.. on my own..
Anonymous No.105662017 >>105662067
>>105661993
>Can you imagine how much better the world will be once its gone?
retards are gonna retard
do you want me to post a list of the asinine shit humans did before social media was invented?
here, have a sample in the form of picrel
Anonymous No.105662023
I didn't get internet until I was 13, I feel bad for gen alpha who were given screens when they should be crawling and playing with their toy trains.
Anonymous No.105662035
>>105661523 (OP)
We should give all the kids free limb amputations while we’re at it. We want people to be as crippled mentally and physically as possible while still being able to extract money from them at the company store
Anonymous No.105662067 >>105662092
>>105662003
>>105662017

Oh removing big media would do much more than just helping terminally online retards.
I don't mean just social media, all big media. Youtube, Steam, Spotify. If such sites have more than a couple million users its gone.

This would mean removing almost all negative influence from all media ever created since they migrated online. People would think again and they would live again.
Sadly the lives of others influence yours which is why things are getting worse and worse for (you) specifically too.

>>105662013
It would be so good. Its sad that this is not possible in this world. But everyone migrating onto smaller communities or completely IRL would just be so good.
Anonymous No.105662069 >>105662185
>>105661993
>Can you imagine how much better the world will be once its gone?
Wo, the exact same world, just minus social media? Wow. That sounds amazing, all the same trappings that led to social media, all the same actors and agents interacting with society just, everywhere else instead, infecting other places!
I can't wait!!!

Yes, I can imagine the world without social media. As much as social media sucks, suddenly removing it doesn't improve everything else around it. If anything, it will make my life worse as social media addicted retards find ways to shit up places like /g/ too, more than they already do.
Anonymous No.105662092 >>105662129 >>105662185
>>105662067
>People would think again and they would live again.
nah
its just that you will strenghten the strongold on information for the elites

anybody can make a fb group or a discord or a yt channel
not so much with creating a newspaper or a tv channel
its the exact reason big globohomo wants to introduce ID- to control the flow of information
Anonymous No.105662108
>>105661523 (OP)
This will never pass
They blocked Porn sites in France (well only the big ones lol) and after 2-3 weeks they reactivated them
Anonymous No.105662117
>>105661523 (OP)
Macron is all talk no action. Macron is the real TACO.
Anonymous No.105662129 >>105662262 >>105662274 >>105662716
>>105662092
NTA but I don't think you have bandwidth required for this discussion. The 90s and 2000s were only 15 years ago a lot of us still rememeber them very well, if you think removing social media and/or instant gratification globohomo slop web2+ would be some kind of dystopia you're actually out of your mind schizo.
Anonymous No.105662130
>NOOOOOOOOOO I CAN'T GROOM 14-YEAR-OLDS ON FACEBOOK ANYMORE IT'S OVERINI
Social media for any purpose other than organizing campus clubs should be banned entirely.
Anonymous No.105662150
>>105662003
If the smart are unable to defeat the retarded, they are in the wrong. The retarded are strong and the smart are weak. The strong crush the weak and this is how it has to be. This is the law of nature.
Anonymous No.105662156
>americucks seething at the existence of Europe again
Why do you hate your ancestors so much?
Anonymous No.105662185 >>105662218 >>105662285
>>105662069
Not just social media. All big media. For the internet it would mean to go back over 20 years to web 1.

>>105662092
They already have all the control they could ever want. In addition to what the other anon said i think that the biggest source of programming disappearing would result in the opposite of a dystopia. You can still express yourself but on smaller platforms that you actually control. Away from monopoly sites and to ones that are actually ran by people.
If anything self-expression would only get better with the censorship of big corporations gone.
Anonymous No.105662192
>>105661523 (OP)
Now we need everyone to ban people over 60... constantly dragging their IRL political bullshit online. Fuckers.
Anonymous No.105662218 >>105662242
>>105662185
Yeah, you're missing the point.
You say 20 years ago. 20 years newspapers were online, they're still bought and operated by the same people, the same think tanks still exist all around.
This doesn't solve my problem, it merely pushed the problem everywhere else.

You have fundamentally misunderstood the entire problem and concept. In fact, I'm struggling to understand how you managed to miss this, despite being so against everything else.
Anonymous No.105662242 >>105662274
>>105662218
I don't mean moving time back 20 years but reducing the internets impact by an amount that would mimic it. Irl media could still be an issue but a web 1 internet with this many users would still have those be obsolete.
Anonymous No.105662262 >>105662281
>>105662129
>bandwidth
>sad homonem
ok, you lost
>90s 2000s
i remember those
>if you think removing social media and/or instant gratification globohomo slop web2+ would be some kind of dystopia you're actually out of your mind schizo.
nice strawman

youre a retard because you used a ton of words to say fuck all in the end
now that we have the politesses out of the way
we can continue the conversation
---

did you know that the american ethos of irrational privatization is the result of human retardation way before social media?
it originated around 1850. pure doing of big oligarchy
another example, more recent: people who voted for the EU
then the treaty of maastricht came up and people voted against
still got passed nonetheless
(its what created a breach of sovereignity in the EU-nation relation)

another example- the holofaux
etc etc etc

retards are gonna retard
social media doesnt change much in that
but on the other hand, they provide alternative information channels

lets look at the positives(ish):
bw 2012 and 2016 dissidents had an enormous presence on the internet
its social media that enabled that
and the result is today more people are redpilled than ever
it happenned indirectly, because we won, then let go of the throat bc trump got elected
then in retaliation big globohomo turned propaganda to 11, and thats what woke up the normshites, open to our message, ciculating in the ether since over a decade now
being an alternative media channel has done a lot of good

youre just an angry impotent autist who is sad he cannot go back to his idealized version of the internet
which was equally shit to begin with
thing is- to be confronted with soc media you have to be on soc media
or be an american but then just sudoku and reroll bc that nation is fucked since the 19th cen
Anonymous No.105662274
>>105662129
This anon gets it. While you're wrong about the 90's only being 15 years ago, the figures are more like 20-30 years ago for 95-05. pre-social media, so around double your quote.
However yes, big media was still online, everything else was still controlled and owned by the same institutions, the same things we see today that are now just on social media were still there.

The concept of simply returning doesn't do anything to solve these issues and why social media became this way in the first place.
-because and this is the important part: all that really, really changed was that smartphones were introduced and normalfags came online. Yes, web design changed, the rise of platforms started but that was there in '05 too, the difference was the users and finance backing it.
>>105662242
You're a fool. A nincompoop, an utter buffoon.
>a web 1 internet with this many users
Stop posting.
Anonymous No.105662281 >>105662298
>>105662262
No, actually I said a really few amount of words to make a pretty concise and accurate point. You just don't get it because you're a midwit, and that's OK.
Anonymous No.105662285 >>105662342
>>105662185
>They already have all the control they could ever want.
lol
lmao even

https://odysee.com/@AvaWolfe:d/Robert-Faurisson-The-Problem-Of-Gas-Chambers---Le-Probleme-Des-Chambres-a-Gaz.FRA-avec-ENG-SUB-:1

just stop browsing nortmalshit and youre good
and if you cant do that
you lost at natural selection, kek
Anonymous No.105662289 >>105662323 >>105662356
>>105661667
>I have a right to preach politics to minors
no you don't, make your own unvaxxed trailer park meth babies if you want to do that
Anonymous No.105662298
>>105662281
your point is void
you are a retard who wanted to intellectualize your retardation
but im not your garden variety redditor
im not like you
Anonymous No.105662323 >>105662353
>>105662289
>vaxed
how retarded you have to be to use that as a talking point 2 years after the fact
you leftshits worthless retards

probably why you suck up to anybody whos powerful btw
victory by proxy and such
Anonymous No.105662342 >>105662361 >>105662412
>people owning their sites is something i don't understand.
>stop posting please.

you could own your own newspaper basically with the internet but instead people consume slop made by the biggest. How do you not get that removing big sites that actively suppress such things would help individuality not just on the internet but IRL too.

>>105662285
I don't use the big sites. But others are still influenced by it and carry it with them into daily life. Thats the issue.
Anonymous No.105662346
>>105661523 (OP)
France based as always, kids should focus on being kids and having fun in life, social media is well poisoning.
Anonymous No.105662353 >>105662367
>>105662323
don't care, access to children is not a right, suck my cock
Anonymous No.105662356
>>105662289
that's noble, but if parents were willing to parent then none of this would be necessary
yeah it's not easy, nobody said it was gonna be, but this is what happens when you just don't even bother
Anonymous No.105662361 >>105662380
>>105662342
>Thats the issue.
are you retarded or something?
>sharty pigrel
you prolly are
---
before soc media journals and tv did a great job at scrambling peoples brains
just look at you, lamao
and, unlike tv or newspapers
it takes way less to create a successful channel
Anonymous No.105662367
>>105662353
yes, i know you are retarded
i heard you the first time
Anonymous No.105662380 >>105662387 >>105662398
>>105662361
people wont go back to buying newspapers at kiosks because youtube is gone wtf. TV and paper is dead. People would still do everything online but scattered around in tightly knit communities instead of the torrent of bullshit we are experiencing today.
Anonymous No.105662387 >>105662398 >>105662407
>>105662380
>people wont go back to buying newspapers at kiosks because youtube is gone wtf
you are VERY fucking retarded
omg
Anonymous No.105662398 >>105662407
>>105662380
>>105662387
also
>not my fault im a retard
>its not our collective fault we created a society of depraved imbeciles
>its 100% soc media
youre part of the problem
its natural for you to think youre not master of your own destiny
Anonymous No.105662407 >>105662425
>>105662387
>and, unlike tv or newspapers
>it takes way less to create a successful channel
you are talking about this being the case when big sites are gone retard

>>105662398
what soc media? ALL big media. Can't you read?
Anonymous No.105662412
>>105662342
You misinterpreted the text.
The call to stop posting wasn't framed as a request. There was no politeness contained in the text.
You grafted the politeness on, where it did not exist before and will even now, remain without.
Anonymous No.105662425
>>105662407
>>and, unlike tv or newspapers
>>it takes way less to create a successful channel
>you are talking about this being the case when big sites are gone retard
this is literally mentally insane
do you think youtube correlates in any way to the legislation about media
and the means one needs to develop to create a journal?

you are indeed profoundly retarded
this should be a bannable offence
youre just making noise. like mentally people usually do btw
Anonymous No.105662716
>>105662129
the more free state of the internet 20 years ago, where information was there if you wanted to look for it, is very different than intentionally crippling any sources of information outside of (((official channels)))
Anonymous No.105662726 >>105662741
Europe canceled the porn ban in France
Anonymous No.105662741
>>105662726
lamao
>>the one good thing that could come from the law
>no, goy. you VILL jerk off to kike propaganda and you VILL like it
Anonymous No.105663025
>>105661544
i don't think 4chan will give a fuck about that. Personally, i think 4chan will get a lot of new users because of that.