Anonymous
6/22/2025, 2:38:15 PM No.105670441
What's their endgame?
Replies:
Thread 105670441 - /g/ [Archived: 831 hours ago]
Anonymous
6/22/2025, 2:43:33 PM No.105670464
getting past hiring filters that check for a certain threshold of git commits in a period of time
Replies:
Anonymous
6/22/2025, 2:49:28 PM No.105670489
>>105670441 (OP)
Fuck knows. Giving India internet was a mistake.
Fuck knows. Giving India internet was a mistake.
Replies:
Anonymous
6/22/2025, 2:50:29 PM No.105670495
>>105670489
India should be banned from the regular internet and they should have a walled garden containment zone
India should be banned from the regular internet and they should have a walled garden containment zone
Replies:
Anonymous
6/22/2025, 3:02:20 PM No.105670568
>>105670520
Of nurgle
Of nurgle
Anonymous
6/22/2025, 3:08:22 PM No.105670614
Replies:
Anonymous
6/22/2025, 3:10:33 PM No.105670630
>>105670441 (OP)
Is there really no solution to this?
Is there really no solution to this?
Replies:
Anonymous
6/22/2025, 3:22:58 PM No.105670711
>>105670630
Not without re-engineering the whole of Github. This is Microsoft's fault for deliberately telling people recruiters check Github and they give out tech jobs to people who have one, which I don't even think is true anymore
"What if 75% of the users are producing low value spam?" was not a question in Github's initial design, it was not meant to become what it is, it was a place by and for developers, and by design a very high trust environment.
I've seen people talk about doing to Github what they've done to Reddit -- things like allowing repositories to ban people by account age -- but really we should just abandon ship, give up. Making open source repositories "moderated" is going to be a whole other can of worms, though I guess that's kind of what they are now, since the owners spend a lot of time closing subliterate issues and pull requests
Not without re-engineering the whole of Github. This is Microsoft's fault for deliberately telling people recruiters check Github and they give out tech jobs to people who have one, which I don't even think is true anymore
"What if 75% of the users are producing low value spam?" was not a question in Github's initial design, it was not meant to become what it is, it was a place by and for developers, and by design a very high trust environment.
I've seen people talk about doing to Github what they've done to Reddit -- things like allowing repositories to ban people by account age -- but really we should just abandon ship, give up. Making open source repositories "moderated" is going to be a whole other can of worms, though I guess that's kind of what they are now, since the owners spend a lot of time closing subliterate issues and pull requests
Anonymous
6/22/2025, 3:26:24 PM No.105670739
>multiple open right now
Anonymous
6/22/2025, 4:13:32 PM No.105671099
>>105670441 (OP)
I can't understand how they're smart enough to be able to submit a PR but not smart enough to know it will be instantly rejected.
I can't understand how they're smart enough to be able to submit a PR but not smart enough to know it will be instantly rejected.
Replies:
Anonymous
6/22/2025, 4:16:58 PM No.105671122
>>105671099
They're not "smart" enough. They're just following some youtube guide that was using this particular repo as an example.
They're not "smart" enough. They're just following some youtube guide that was using this particular repo as an example.
Anonymous
6/22/2025, 4:19:31 PM No.105671143
Replies:
Anonymous
6/22/2025, 4:22:12 PM No.105671164
>>105670630
Surely there's a way to use the github api to auto reject or hide this when an Indian name is detected?
Surely there's a way to use the github api to auto reject or hide this when an Indian name is detected?
Anonymous
6/22/2025, 4:22:32 PM No.105671167
perfect for gorgeous looks
Cephandrius-,$.o.6t
6/22/2025, 4:24:25 PM No.105671185
>>105671143
why are you laughing sir
why are you laughing sir
Anonymous
6/22/2025, 4:44:40 PM No.105671334
>>105670614
>You may have to run the command chmod 701 github_painter.sh to give executable permission to the file. Then, run sudo ./github_painter.sh to run the script.
>701
>sudo
huh
>You may have to run the command chmod 701 github_painter.sh to give executable permission to the file. Then, run sudo ./github_painter.sh to run the script.
>701
>sudo
huh
Replies:
Anonymous
6/22/2025, 5:37:29 PM No.105671746
>>105671334
read the source code
read the source code
Anonymous
6/22/2025, 5:41:33 PM No.105671792
>>105671334
I didn't find anything unordinary in github_painter.sh, I guess script author is just retarded
I didn't find anything unordinary in github_painter.sh, I guess script author is just retarded