>>105687200
it's worse than that, it's native ELF executables >>105687206
I'm already using DWM but I don't which standalone file manager to use if not this one
>>105687242
if you double click on an ELF executable it will execute, and "Execute" will also be the first item in the menu when you right click on an compiled executable file
I even tried to make executable files get opened with vim as the default opener, to prevent execution, but it doesn't stick
>>105687507
so is this one of those times when you come up with somerhing, realize its silly, but for some reason just cant say so. so you double down and make outlandish claims digging yourself into a silly hole. the pepe should have given it away deSu.
anyway: nigger that is THE ONLY default use case for double clicking an executable. literally nothing else makes sense in any scenario.
>>105687556 >gaslighting >mental gymnastics
kill yourself you literal faggot
the only sensible action is to not execute it and do nothing because it's not safe
you might double click it by accident because of muscle memory
>>105687874
and how do I execute these executables now?
I don't want to prevent execution, I want to prevent executing anythnig via Thunar
how the fuck is it difficult to understand? or why do I want this?
do you know how many Windows users accidentially executed malware?
>>105687249
what's the point of this? why can't you just name it exe like on windows and automatically make it executable? basic design flaws like this is the reason linux is not popular
