Loonix desktop in 2025:
>Replace most core utilities (sudo, ls, etc.) with untested clones with fewer features.
>Replace X11 with Gayland, for worse accessibility, software compatibility issues, missing features, and (as a cherry on top), making some games slower.
>Dropping 32 bit support. Loonix running on fewer hardware options, and losing software compatibility with many games.
How do we cope? Do we all move to macOS now? Tim Apple wouldn't treat his paying customers like this, that's for sure.

>>105703389 (OP)
BlockTube to block Luncuck.

Get a Mac mini and join us. Its great!

>>105703389 (OP)
You can always use a distro with these technologies still intact, you know.

>>105703845
based

>"linux problems"
>look inside
>shitty distros being shit like always
nothing burger

less is more so it's fine in fact
also buy an ad Bryan

Brian lunduke is a spamming grifter

>this kike again
kill yourself

>dropping 32bit support
I'd really like to hear the rationale on why this is terrible

Lunduke here, guys come on just watch my videos. I'm on the based and redpilled anti woke team. We can't let the trannies win! Also we must protect Israel from the terrorists!~!!!

>>105705391
It's rust retards crying about "MUH WINE!!!! MUH STEAM CLIENT!!!!"
But wine supports WOW64, same as windows and if distros actually remove 32 bit libraries, steam will just release a 64 client, just like how they did on macOS.

The people crying about this don't understand this.

>>105705470
32bit is a misnomer
They should say they are dropping i686 because that is the real intention here, drop anything pre-core2/athlon64 and the handful of non-x64 CPUs that where released afterwards.

Ubuntu recently dropped i686 as an arch that can be installed upon but still provided 32bit packages.

>>105705570
They do want to drop multilib, though. So it's not wrong.

>>105703389 (OP)
The only bad thing on this list is dropping 32bit support, chud

>>105703389 (OP)
>core utility replacement
that's ubuntu right?
>hard push of wayland
fedora.
>killing 32bit
fedora. fedora is the distro to avoid. you should already be avoiding ubuntu.

*do nothing*

Yeah we're cooked unless we can overthrow Redhat. RH is responsible for all of this but they're like our version of Microsoft.

>>105703389 (OP)
>Replace most core utilities (sudo, ls, etc.) with untested clones with fewer features.
>waah waah stuff I don't have to use that have zero effect on my life existing at all is a tragedy
kill yourself sensationalist faggot
>>Replace X11 with Gayland, for worse accessibility, software compatibility issues, missing features, and (as a cherry on top), making some games slower.
has been working on my mixed refresh rate setup for 3 years now, cry more about it faggot
>software compatibility issues,
nope
>missing features
oh no weird macro/keyspam thing used by 0.005% of the userbase is missing, good thing nothing prevents you from using X

>replace core utilities with untested clones
in ubuntu, which only a minority of linux users use in current year, and ubuntu users are the least likely to use those "core utilities" anyway
>replace x11 with wayland for>
>worse accessibility
since when do rightoids care about people with disabilities lmao
>making some games slower
isn't wayland much faster for games? isn't that the reason valve went to the trouble of making a wayland microcompositor for their gaming mode on the steam deck?
>dropping 32 bit support. Linux running on fewer hardware option
said hardware options are my 2001 thinkpad r40 and 2007 thinkpad t60 with the non-64bit capable CPU (though I replaced it with a 64-bit capable one anyway for ~7 yuros) horror of horrors I won't be able to run modern distros on them whatever will I do
>losing software compatibility with many games
WineonWine64 makes this a nothingburger

>>105703389 (OP)
A long time ago, to try to catapult his own career, Lunduke tried to ruin Stallman's life. This was over a decade ago before others started doing it.

He had this weird video podcast called "Linux Action Show" or some shit, where he portrayed himself as a free software supporter and educator, except all he did was attack free software.

In one episode, Stallman said what he has always said for decades. That proprietary developers will have to find a new job if freedom wins.

Lunduke (a proprietary dev) only pretends to like freedom. He doesn't know what freedom is. The only thing he knows about it is that it's "open source".

That's why Lunduke was so vividly furious when he found out what Stallman said.

Instead of arguing against Stallman's statement, he spent the rest of the interview and in the next videos digging up Stallman's posts about age of consent and claiming that Stallman hates children and wants to starve children to death because children can't survive without proprietary work.

Every Jew could be put inside an oven 144 meter cubed, I asked chatGPT and the math checks out. It doesn't seem big but if they all lie down like matchsticks they all fit inside.

The OP is either Lunduke himself, or a bot that he's deployed, or a Pinoy, Indonesian, Turk or whatever who shills for him for free under the assumption it'll turn him/her White.

None of Lunduke's shill posts get deleted and he dodges the question every time.

Is Lunduke a fed or is he paying 4chan to let him use posts as ad slots because he's never gotten banned for shilling and begging for money?

https://desuarchive.org/g/thread/103855766
https://desuarchive.org/g/thread/103855766/#103857139
https://desuarchive.org/g/thread/103855766/#103857152
https://desuarchive.org/g/thread/103855766/#103857164
https://desuarchive.org/g/thread/103855766/#103857197
https://desuarchive.org/g/thread/103855766/#103857214
https://desuarchive.org/g/thread/103855766/#103857238
https://desuarchive.org/g/thread/103855766/#103857287
https://desuarchive.org/g/thread/103855766/#103857301
https://desuarchive.org/g/thread/103585860
https://desuarchive.org/g/thread/103585921
https://desuarchive.org/g/thread/103538026
https://desuarchive.org/g/thread/103466704
https://desuarchive.org/g/thread/103434055/#103445216
https://desuarchive.org/g/thread/103429665
https://desuarchive.org/g/thread/103403579
https://desuarchive.org/g/thread/103319204
https://desuarchive.org/g/thread/103343066

Is Lunduke the ultimate SJW?

A long time ago, to try to catapult his own career, he tried to ruin Stallman's life. This was over a decade ago before others started doing it.

He had this weird video podcast called "Linux Action Show" or some shit, where he portrayed himself as a free software supporter and educator, except all he did was attack free software.

In one episode, Stallman said what he has always said for decades. That proprietary developers will have to find a new job if freedom wins.

Lunduke (a proprietary dev) only pretends to like freedom. He doesn't know what freedom is. The only thing he knows about it is that it's "open source".

That's why Lunduke was so vividly furious when he found out what Stallman said.

Instead of arguing against Stallman's statement, he spent the rest of the interview and in the next videos digging up Stallman's posts about age of consent and claiming that Stallman hates children and wants to starve children to death because children can't survive without proprietary work.

>>105703389 (OP)
Baitposts like this get too much attention.

The Jew makes videos about 4chan being incompetent and he never gets banned for wiping his ass with 4chan. Either 4chan mods love sucking on Jew balls or they were caught in a Jew blackmail ring.

>>105703389 (OP)
ur dumb, that was an april fools post.

>>105703389 (OP)
>ITT: assblasted leftists
4chan is right-wing. Deal with it, faggots!

>>105707457
4chan is not right wing in the slightest. 4chan has no wings.

I don't care what loonkike or anybody else says. Still using Linux.

>>105707457
4chan ist links

links you idiots. links!

L - I - N - K - S

>links are against the hecking copyright law, you are banned!
Süß, sie beschneiden sich mal wieder selbst und denken das tut uns weh. Fuck this site, every cyrillic poster is getting insulted as ivan because you're too technologically illiterate and tinfoilhatted to use google chrome. There are still people using the internet, the international network, without a translator. And they call themselves technologically literate, they even have the linux! Oh wow, they have the anti russian bot farm banning Linux, they know what they are doing, they are so hardcore, they even know who is who.
Who is left, who is right, they've got it all figured out

>>105703389 (OP)
Just don't use them?

>>105707413
Who is this old hag anyway? She must look much older without makeup, who is that? Bidens blow up doll fuckpuppet (no offense)? Why do you post grannies on a techno forum?

>>105703389 (OP)
this is why we need and have multiple distros. none of that applies to most distros

>>105703389 (OP)
>The Zionist Journal
wew
why is he the authority on linux?

>>105707634
Because people who are into right wing identity politics need someone to feed them talking points about every subject they are interested in. Hence the existence of grifters like this.

>>105706728
>You were issued a warning for posting >>105691603.
>Trolling is not permitted. Do not instigate or participate in flamewars.

>>105703389 (OP)
Please explain why 32 bit support must be dropped entirely and not kept as a compilation option. Can't C do
#ifdef X86
#define address_t uint32_t
#elseif
#define address_t uint64_t
though desu it must be automatic already. So what gives?

>>105707935
Because back in the real world, even my 64 bit CPU is considered obsolete. Literally nobody owns or uses 32 bit hardware.

>lunduke grifts on some happening
>/g/ immediately go "look! He's a filthy kike!!!"
O rly?... and do you think this makes me less enticed to go full american history x on redhat devs skull in minecraft?
Kore wa kore, sore wa sore.

>>105705633
Just don't use any of their shit, simple.

>>105707667
>Because people who are into right wing identity politics need someone to feed them talking points
Did your fact checker tell you that, yes?

>>105708296
>have embedded
>4Gb RAM tops
>eugh... put x64 there too...
>what do you mean why, just do it bloody sar!

>>105708395
yeah I'll just tty into emacs and hack the framebuffer for graphics from now on lmao

>>105708420
meant for >>105708390

>>105708419
>>have embedded
So don't try to run Linux on it?

>>105708420
I don't think X counts as using their shit.

>>105705470
Support for old native Linux games would still be lost though

>>105708498
Such as?

>>105708541
Nta but Neverwinter Nights 1 for one

>>105703389 (OP)
>Loonix desktop in 2025:
>Just works
I don't see the problem

>>105708554
>$20 on steam
that pricepoint would make me think that those lazy niggerfaggot devs could port it to 64bit in 2 weeks

>>105708580
>implying
If 32bit libs get deprecated steam will just grab the windows binaries and shove them in proton. Imo it's fucking sad to think about.

>>105708614
It's only sad to think about all the idiots paying $20 for this slop.

>>105705391
>tfw no vampire gf to drink your boyperiod blood

>>105703389 (OP)
Why is that kike making anti linux videos and why is some other kike, or possibly the same kike, making these shit threads. Really makes you think.
Well not really, cos the answer is obvious.

>>105708636
>slop
Was a fun game, and still is some regards, that said buying games on steam is gay.

>>105708795
A game can be fun alright, but if it's programmed poorly, it's slop, don't care.

>>105708799
Why it's programmed poorly?

>>105708868
Because it won't work without Linux's support for 50 year old hardware?
What kind of fucking nocoder gets filtered by 64bit code anyway?
$20 lmao. I wouldn't pay even $2 for this shit.

>>105708900
What hardware are you talking about? Linux distros don't even run on core duos in 2025.

>>105708900
Nigger is an old game from 32bit era, it's not actively maintained, ofc if 32bit libs get deprecated so it will NWN as well.

>>105708984
Then it should be free and not $20.
>Captcha: Oy Vey Goy

>>105709002
Well, i do agree on that

>>105708900
AI couldn't be this retarded

>>105705639
I'll switch to wayland once we get an exwm on wayland

>>105708779
Lunduke once admitted he's a former Microsoft employee. He's always attacked free software. He says he doesn't hate free software (lol).

He tries to ruin the life of anyone who supports free software by saying they're trying to kill children, which is ironic because he's a Zionist Jew.

Was Lunduke the first influential person who tried to cancel Stallman? Stallman said proprietary is bad which caused Lunduke to sperg out and say Stallman is a rapist for not wanting the age of consent to be 20.

>>105703389 (OP)
Good to see that I was right about him a decade ago when I completely started ignoring him. That retard hasn't stopped spreading FUD and misinfo.

>>105705391
Linux doesn't provide a compatibility layer like WOW64 on Windows which would allow you to run 32bit software on it. Flatpak doesn't cut it for a lot of people, distrobox isn't normie-proof.

>>105705570
>but still provided 32bit packages.
Fedora wants to cut 32bit packages

>>105703389 (OP)
>kill woke
>software gets worse
really makes you think

The hate for Lunduke is hilarious. Keep giving him free content, freaks.

Now you know why people put up with TPM and Telemetry to escape the Linux madness. I'm dying on this hill.

And this is why hundreds of millions of people live in the Mario Jail instead of "just" getting a Steam Deck.

It is true that Linux desktop has been on a self destruction path for four or five years now.

>>105705696
ebasedi was right, ban Lundberg and his kosher chuds

>>105710392
usecase for banning?

>>105710285
just use w10 ltsc

>>105709803
>kill woke
when? if anything, the corpo are putting more and more metally ill people in there

>>105703389 (OP)
>Dropping 32 bit support
>Oh no my 25 year old PentiumIII shitboxerinos and handful of 32bit linux-native closed soruce games!

Windows dropped 32bit support 18 years ago, was that a problem? It's like he ran out of real issues and needed to list at least three

>>105711452
Windows dropped the 32bit libs nut at least has the WOW64 wrapper for running legacy code and linux doesn't so of course it's a retarded decision like putting the cart before the horse.

>>105705470
Nigger, without 32-bit binaries WINE can't run some old shit. The amount of VNs that require 32-bit codecs to run on GNU/Linux is actually quite big.

>>105711509

The difference between windows programs and linux ones is that the linux ones are open-source and thus maintained for as long as people see a use in them. This isn't some freeware you downloaded in 1999 from a company that doesnt exist anymore. If you really need to run some obscure version of 32-bit WordPerfect just use a VM with an old enough OS to match it. Like >>105708614 mentioned you could also use some hacky emulation workaround like proton if you so desperately need to, who cares.

>>105711452
The difference is that Windows supports 32-bit libs and software because it has WOW64. Linux doesn't have an equivalent to this.
Someone would have to make these things work at least through distrobox or flatpak.

>>105711582
Wine 9/10 have support for running 32-bit windows software, although it's experimental.
Valve will be forced to act on this anyways because a lot of their customers rely on 32-bit dependencies.

>>105711629
You know how WINE works? It's basically a translator that converts Windows syscalls to GNU/Linux equivalents.

32-bit software relies on 32-bit GNU/Linux binaries. It's not trivial to simply call 64-bit binaries instead or it would've been done a decade ago already.

>>105711670
https://www.theregister.com/2024/01/18/wine_90_is_out
you're wrong