>>105719573
>disingenuous kvetching
You listed all the necessary features. That's it. That's all that's needed.
>nooo but i don't like when things change, i want to stay mired in the same old garbage forever, it's hard for me to adapt
We NEED a better animated gif format. This isn't up for debate. And a good animated image format absolutely SHOULD be able to handle both lossy and lossless compression methods. The choice should be up to the utilizer which method he wants to use. That webp also does what jpeg and png do further minimizes implementation details and points of error.
You sound like a helpless consumer that thinks websites magically own and mutate images just to inconvenience him.
If you want to be a luddite and forever run around in your circular rut using the same old tech the rest of your life, no one is holding a gun to your head. But crying crocodile tears because the rest of the world is moving on ain't it.
