Thread 105713247

Why american woke right hates privacy?

**What is the woke right?**
The woke right are those individuals who spend all day whining about "woke" stuff, yet they live completely immersed in the *wokesphere* and even get mad defending it:

> They use operating systems made by woke companies
> They use search engines run by woke companies
> They use web browsers developed by woke companies
> They use smartphones with logos from woke companies
> They buy clothes from woke brands
> They use email services from woke corporations
> They drive cars from companies with woke policies
> They even shave with razors made by woke companies

The actual woke crowd loves the woke right — all they do is fund their companies.

They sure will get mad at this post because their mind can't understand you can use alternatives to the wokesphere

Woke right mind doen't understang you can use the internet without giving all your data to apple/google/microsoft

You will see this thread will be filled buy american wokesphere-lovers calling me psyop because they need to defend their iwatch or something lol.

hiding this useless thread

Doesn't that only work on Google Pixel devices?

>>105713247 (OP)
>>105713253
The term "woke" originally emerged in 1930s, so you would have to stop using pretty much all modern computers. Even the device from which you posted this is "woke". Either become an Amish or take your meds and stop spamming your politcal faggotry here, you obsessed, mindbroken /pol/ pissbaby troon.

apple/google shareholders (aka everyone with investments) don't believe in security/privacy

>>105713247 (OP)
I wouldn't trust a phone with a.i. embedded in their chips like google's tensor chips.

>>105713278
Yeah. Graphene is mostly concerned with security. If anything they do towards security also hinders mass surveillance, it's just a happy little accident.

Woke right are just libs from 1990- early 2000s.

>>105713247 (OP)
>woke right
fucking Chris Chappel shit. I wish Youtube would ban china uncensored already

bc authoritarians (aka "anti-woke" people) strongly support spying on citizens, etc
as well as banning stuff they hate

>>105714484
phones themselves are mass surveillance devices unless you take extreme and often illegal precautions. the brand doesn't matter and an international megacorp like Google is more likely to refuse government demands than some pop and mom shop.

pixel phones suck

>>105714821
>an international megacorp like Google is more likely to refuse government demands
imagine actually believing this

>>105713247 (OP)
this is anom phone 2. the feds have stepped up their game. been monitoring their simplex chstrooms. not a single soul knows what the fuck is going on.

that other8026 nigger recommends google play instead of aurora and condemns fdroid and uses obtanium in place, obtanium, a glorified apk downloader, 'more secure' than fdroid

this cant be fucking real. the community is maliciously retarded. not to mention the fact that the camera app is trash and screenshots can crash your whole fucking phone. have you tried cropping a screenshot on this god forsaken os?

im glad pixel saga is over and google isnt hand holding them anymore with their meme security chip and device trees.

>>105715033
read the rest of the sentence and then think for a moment why a megacorp with an army of lawyers is better equipped to tell the government to fuck off than some indie startup. and i mean really think about it.

>>105713980
Too late everything has AI now, my spicy mcchicken from mcdicks has AI now, can you believe it?

>>105713253
Didn’t all of those companies drop wokeshit the instant the USAID money dried up?

>>105714821
>Google is more likely to refuse government demands

Anon, time, and time again google (big corpo) will always comply with government. I read this a long time ago on this board, where law enforcement would have a direct phone number from Google that they will call and ask for info on someone and guess what they always do give up without lawyers involved.

>>105715105
an indie startup doesn't even remotely have the scale to be as invasive as a gigacorpo does. you might be the dumbest person on planet earth

>>105715179
did you and your buddy >>105715033 just fly in from stupid town? what's so hard to grasp about a comparison where both values can be very high (chance to comply) but one of them is bigger than the other (figure it out yourself)?

i starting to suspect you people aren't even real code ninjas... mere artisans? nay... you are code NOOBS that's what you are!

>>105715226
literally just release an app and have everyone download it. boom. one person indie startup has world wide scale. or what kind of scale are you talking about? please use the english language cause i'm not versed in whatever language you retards use

>>105713247 (OP)
The mkultra buzzphrase "woke right" is a complete inversion of reality.
"Woke" was blacks, women, gays getting special protection from criticism, special hate speech enhancements for crimes, etc - basically identity based vicimhood narratives for political power.

Now the "anti-woke" movement is controlled by jews. jews are calling you "woke" for not giving them special protection from criticism that isn't even slanderous - they literally get money from a foreign lobby and then manipulate government in their interest. And leaving that aside, I should be able to say whatever the hell I want about a foreign country. I never see any of these people complaining about anti-White or anti-American speech. They've been the primary purveyors of it for decades.

tl;dr - its a jewish op

>>105715234
an indie startup with a comparable scale to google would not be an indie startup. no such thing has or ever will exist. now get out

>>105715330
did you even read my post? do you understand words and their meaning?

>>105715467
I'm interacting with somebody who believes google doesn't fully comply and in fact work directly with agencies. It is my fault for responding to a mental case. Good bye retard

>>105715497
>strawman
have fun debating yourself