>>105738285
>I think making a plumbing robot is easier then making a AI who generates pictures and videos
>Not understanding that his job is even easier to automate.
Are you young or just highly specialized in some tech sector?
I don't wish to sound hostile, but this is extremely naive.
The reason jobs like trucking and trades like electricians/plumbers/HVAC/whatever you call the gas one in English, gas fitter(?) are NOT going to be automated anytime soon is because that is simply not possible.
AI isn't magic, it's not even all that great. Tradesman have to deal with 100+ year old infrastructure and random shit DAILY. Standards have changed and they have changed OFTEN.
Buildings don't have exact layout plans for everything that are miraculously correct after 20 renovations over the past hundred years of an office building. Concrete doesn't break the same way each time either.
Unexpected outcomes are what you expect and correct for all the time.
This is not something a pattern recognition machine can simply solve.
Nothing is standardized out there to the degree autists imagine.
The only way AI could EVER replace those jobs if the world collectively decided and agreed on standards and rebuilt literally all infrastructure ever made to suit the AI robots.
>I also think this is why they literally put a halt on autonomous vehicles.
Now consider what I wrote and you might realize that it is quite a bit easier to build trams and railways than cars that can recognize every random shit that you need in a real world.
There is a reason why self driving shit is works best on precise and predictable paths and why especially the Tesla image recognition based one is so dogshit in real world scenarios.
Basically anything that can be described precisely enough and doesn't need much adaptation is easily replaced. This is why codefags should be shitting themselves more than most.
For megacorps it's easy to shift infrastructure to be AI compatible. Reality isn't.
