← Home ← Back to /g/

Thread 105739255

11 posts 6 images /g/
Anonymous No.105739255 [Report] >>105740120 >>105742337 >>105742396 >>105742580
https://corrode.dev/podcast/s04e06-1password/
1Password is deeply compromised. They have switched to Rust for managing their critical systems, pull all your passwords from the platform if you use it.
Anonymous No.105740120 [Report]
>>105739255 (OP)
no one cares about the important stuff
Anonymous No.105741643 [Report]
I use this:
username = base36(tuplehash(31, masterpassword, domain))
password = z85(tuplehash(128, masterpassword, domain, username))
keypair = ed25519(tuplehash(256, masterpassword, "ed25519", identity))
tuplehash(output_bits, t_1, ..., t_n) = shake128(t_1 || length(t_1) || ... || t_n || length(t_n) || n || output_bits)
Anonymous No.105742337 [Report]
>>105739255 (OP)
still not as bad as lastpass
also
>proprietary password managers
Anonymous No.105742396 [Report] >>105742472 >>105742604
>>105739255 (OP)
> senior rust engineer shills own language
> "never fail"
> *forgets that CVE reports for many rust programs exists*
nice one, senior rust tranny. these faggots just never quit. also: 1password pays rust for "silver membership". i guess the money also pays for the shilling. no conflicts of interest here, everyone. move along, cut your genitals off and download rust.
Anonymous No.105742472 [Report] >>105742504
>>105742396
>Conflict of interest
What? They are a silver member because they want to use the language lmao.
Anonymous No.105742504 [Report] >>105743432
>>105742472
there is a conflict of interest when you are taking money from a multi-million dollar business like 1password to then use it as a talking point to shill your cancerous programming language.
Anonymous !TrANNY2dGk No.105742580 [Report]
>>105739255 (OP)
use case?
Just use Keepass or something
Anonymous No.105742604 [Report]
>>105742396
So all the companies paying the Linux Foundation are actually in a conflict of interest if they use Linux?
Anonymous No.105743432 [Report] >>105746294
>>105742504
>it's ok when the sepple committee does it
Anonymous No.105746294 [Report]
>>105743432
yues