Thread 105739867

holy shit this trash is token inefficient

how do we fix this??

>>105739867 (OP)
HTML is beautiful
CSS is cancer

>>105740256
I'll make the logo!

>>105740256
we have the llm write code using streamlit or similar for web interfaces

>>105739867 (OP)
Tokenizer issue

>>105740484
its not a tokenizer issue, it's just verbose and shitty

>>105740530
You said token inefficient, not character inefficient
There's no reason each tag and common syntax element cannot be its own token

>>105740572
i'm talking about llm tokenizers.

>>105740591
Tell me what you think a LLM tokenizer is

I just hate HTML because it's a pain in the ass to write all the closing tags. Never used a non-trivial amount of CSS so I can't really comment.

>>105740604
tell me what YOU think they are and what they are buitl for

>>105740623
You're not getting out that easily chuddie. You're the one making the claim that a LLM cannot be made to tokenize html efficiently, which is the unusual claim that requires proof here

>>105740636
put it into a tokenizer and see how expensive it is you stupid cunt

having the llm roll its own html/css is usually 10-50x the token cost of having it use something like streamlit

>>105740710
You're rage baiting, I don't think /g/ is quite this dumb
Feel free to refer back to my original point: >>105740484

>>105740739
>i know better than anthropic says the pedophile anime addicted neet freak
lol

>>105739867 (OP)
>blaming the tool instead of the user (jeet)

>>105740256
>>105740396

If you can't into CSS in big* 2025, unironically kys.

* :-)