Why is nobody opposing ID requirements for accessing websites?

>>105745007 (OP)
what website is that?

>>105745007 (OP)
I just use a vpn

>>105745021
rule34video.com

why is nobody opposing anything?


First they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a socialist.

Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a trade unionist.

Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Jew.

Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me.

>>105745007 (OP)
because everyone with a few working brain cells can bypass those for free/very little in like 10 minutes or so. As long as you are not braindamaged /pol/tard, you should be able to do that just fine. Just stop shitting yourself on mongolian throatsinging forum and literally google it, right now.

>>105745007 (OP)
Nobody who actually cares about his privacy actually uses those websites.

>>105745078
What after they ban those methods, retard?

>>105745089
If you had the slightest amount of technical knowledge, you would know that its impossible to do that.

>>105745062
Then they came for the gooners, and I spoke out — Because I gooned.

>>105745007 (OP)
I do. I don't sign up or use the website.

>>105745062
Socialists, trade unionists, and Jews hate my guts and would never speak out for me.

>>105745007 (OP)
People do. But because most of these laws are local to a small area, people worldwide do not have jurisdiction to complain about it despite the worldwide nature of the internet.

>>105745204
It's a UK law though. They're also investigating 4chan.

it's a good way to deny gooners their degenerate content & to keep underage people out. it's based af.

>>105745007 (OP)
I don't live in the UK and these laws are unconstitutional here
Frankly if I did, I would be embarrassed that police are more worried about people using websites while pakis rape unhindered in the streets

>>105745062
I've been speaking out for years, I was speaking out when police were dragging a journalist away from a court house because they didn't want them taking pictures of the Rape Gang ringleaders as they were leaving after getting their full pardon from the King. What has it changed?

>>105745266
alright now convince millions of others of the same thing
shoo, on your way you go

>>105745280
I did, it's directly the reason Brexit happened. It's why Tories came in and basically ruined healthcare, again.
What did it change? The rape gangs still aren't in jail. They never will be because Tories and SNP, despite their big talk about being tough on migrant crime, are literally the people buying lolis from them.

So
What is the answer?
Shoo, back to Pakistan with you

>>105745007 (OP)
This is leading us toward a general internet ID which will eventually be mandated due to AI bot proliferation, and then ultimately it will include our legal status, health info, banking access, etc. Once everything is all tied into the one ID, it will make the goyim much easier to control. All you would have to do to keep someone in line is threaten to revoke their digital ID.

Because conservatives think after 18 orbits round the sun your brain automatically flips in to "adult mode".

>>105745297
brexit is already being turned back because of how much of a failure it was


the answer is simple, you go on your merry way with your own politics
good luck!

>>105745007 (OP)
Because no normalfag wants to oppose bills that are "protecting children" even if proven ineffective, and politicians love pushing them because it makes it seems like they are doing their job.
And if it's just one state/country, it's easier for a site to block access than try to comform to nonsensical laws.

>>105745062
votes don't count, only option is violence

>>105745062
That's deep.

>>105745325
>brexit is already being turned back because of how much of a failure it was
Agreed, if there are rats in your house, you don't go outside and demand the rats stop coming in, you get rid of the rats in your house.
>the answer is simple, you go on your merry way with your own politics
thousands of little girls getting raped isn't "my own politics" this is in fact a national disaster that will affect you too in your lifetime.

good luck!

>>105745007 (OP)
Because nobody likes arrogant europeans. Good riddance.

>>105745325
>you go on your merry way with your own politics
Just curious, what are your politics if you feel that way?
And how does censoring the internet contribute to fixing your politics?

>>105745349
brexit had nothing to do with 'rape gangs'

>>105745219
It is a globohomo law. Nothing of value will be lost.

4chan has porn on it, and it can easily be made to perform age verification. But hey, maybe you can pay for a 4chan pass and use a VPN, how convenient :^)

>>105745362
actually it had everything to do with it. the only reason it got traction was because of the courts letting them off the hook. Also don't put 'rape gangs' in quotes like this isn't a real thing that hasn't been proven in court as existing.

>>105745362
Brexit had everything to do with that. You're crazy.

>>105745378
Worse, he's a liberal.
Same liberals who want to censor the internet so they don't have to deal with the gang violence in the country,as well.

>>105745357
all im saying is that you are unhappy, you shouldnt bicker and complain and rather be the change you want to see in others

>I'm starting with the man in the mirror
>I'm asking him to change his ways
>And no message could have been any clearer
>If you wanna make the world a better place
>Take a look at yourself and then make a change
- Michael Jackson

>>105745374
>>105745378
maybe thats the reason why you voted for brexit, but that was definitely not the motivation behind it from the brexiteers

>>105745387
>all im saying is that you are unhappy, you shouldnt bicker and complain and rather be the change you want to see in others
You say this while politicians are literally forcing their change on me by demanding certain websites to change.

>"I'M STARTING WITH THE MAN ON THE INTERNET, I'M GONNA FORCE HIM TO POST HIS FACE"

-Michael Jackson and You, apparently. Kys

>>105745301
no, we think that happens after 30.
>under 30=underage cancer
over 30=adult human being

>>105745385
i hate liberals, theyre the reason im telling you to DO SOMETHING

>>105745387
So if I want my money to stop being devalued by federal reserve Jews, I just need to be a better person? KYS

>>105745397
>maybe thats the reason why you voted for brexit, but that was definitely not the motivation behind it from the brexiteers
Actually that's 100% the reason from brexiteers. Like, the stated fact that paki gangs were coming in unimpeded was one of the reasons, stated, that it happened.
All the shit Cons said about it afterwards was just cope.

>>105745404
why dont YOU become the politician? faggot

>>105745423
>JUST BE BORN RICH AND ENTER A POLITICAL DYNASTY
Why don't you eat a bullet?

>>105745419
no the reason was neochauvinism fueled by the desperate desires to restore the better times from the empire

>>105745423
>JUST BUILD YOUR OWN COUNTRY
>Brexit happens
>Trump is elected
>NOOO NOT LIKE THAT
Why are you like this?

>>105745436
>nooooo i am a victim of the system
>nooooooo i cant change the system
>noooooo noooo noooo that would be too much to ask for
idiot

>>105745449
>the reason is *a bunch of shit nobody ever said*
As previously stated: You're a clueless liberal and should kys

>>105745007 (OP)
because it incentivizes the proliferation of censhorship circumvention technologies

>>105745451
i abandoned ship long ago
im not suffering from brexit crashing the economy of the united kingdom, im not suffering from trump crashing the economy of the united states and starting a civil war

>>105745456
>nooooooo i cant change the system
We did change it though, you're still seething about it to this day. >>105745449
The problem is we can't change it enough.

>>105745459
im a communist, we hate liberals

>>105745449
>no the reason was neochauvinism
Which homosexual on BBC told you that?

>>105745477
im not seething about brexit, your middle class is
i dont even live in the country any more

>>105745062
OY VEY IS ANUDDA SHOA

>>105745475
>im not suffering from brexit crashing the economy of the united kingdom, im not suffering from trump crashing the economy of the united states and starting a civil war
If only.
If things were actually as bad as libtards proclaimed they were, then nobody would be thinking about censoring the internet instead of fixing problems.

They're hyper-fixated on the internet because they have no real problems to solve. Kind of like how you're stating retarded shit because you have no real problems of your own either in your parents basement.

>>105745489
>I'm a commie :^)
Marx lived in someone's basement until he died too.

>>105745490
wouldnt know, i dont watch television, sorry

good riddance.

>>105745511
engels can i have more money please

>>105745513
Oh okay, so you made it up in your head.
Politics actually sucks because retards like you exist who hallucinate how the world works.
>>105745387
>>105745489
>Just change the whole world by changing yourself! Did I mention I'm a communist?
So how has your change gotten you closer to the worker's paradise

>>105745511
indeed the rich elite have no problems so theyre just making up stuff
meanwhile the working class can barely afford dinner because the cost of living went through the roof

lol

imagine complying with the laws of other nations

if the uk doesn't like my website, they can nationally block it themselves

>>105745530
i write silly books about silly people with silly little hats like my idol karl marx

>>105745475
>trump crashing the economy of the united states
the economy is the strongest it's been in ages, /p/edosky-chan

>>105745007 (OP)
This shit is coming to the whole of the EU by the end of the year and probably even the US since republicans hate pornography with a passion

>>105745554

>>105745366
Spotted the moskal with AIDS.

>>105745584
Ha, wrong. big dumby

>>105745593
Just because cheese pizza is legal in your hellscape dystopia, it doesn't mean it should be everywhere else.

>>105745533
>>105745502
>>105745475
>meanwhile the working class can barely afford dinner because the cost of living went through the roof
Agreed but this is every economy on Earth right now. Wherever you moved to, they are also having a middle class crisis of some variety related to money. There isn't a single place that has a healthy middle class anymore.

The UK gets the worst of the banning bills because they have never fought back against a ban or against the surveillance state since the War on Terror. They didn't fight back against the Knife bans. They didn't fight back against the Spoon bans. They didn't fight back against the silverware bans. They didn't fight back when cameras were installed on every street corner. They didn't fight back when journalists were being arrested for filming the cameras on every corner.

They simply do not fight back. Ever. So every surveillance state measure or ban is always tested in their little cuck island of peasants who don't know how to fight, before being rolled out everywhere else. Yes, that includes where you are living right now. This is coming to you, and the fact it was put in place in the UK will be used as justification for doing it.

>>105745300
This. It's painfully obvious.

>>105745627
>Just because
You should start a blog.

>>105745582
>nine whole pence in the period of eight months
ZOUNDS, THE WORLD IS ENDING

>>105745647
capitalism is a global problem indeed
the reason why the british arent fighting anything is because they are tired, very tired

>>105745666
>noooo my heckin basederino redpilled miga president cant be ruining the country!
>nooooo thats not possible!

>>105745673
>capitalism is the problem
bro have you just not heard of North Korea, China, or the Soviet Union? China in particular is having this problem on steroids where they get even more draconian bans and surveillance, and they're not even capitalist.

>the reason why the british arent fighting anything is because they are tired, very tired
Everyone is. Getting very tired of politics lets them do whatever they want.

>>105745697
all those countries practice(d) state capitalism
real communism hasnt been tried before

>>105745007 (OP)
the fuck are we supposed to do about it

>>105745300
is there work being done on alternative "internets", an alternative protocol, or p2p mesh networks that can substitute the "old" and "dead" internet?

>>105745697
>thing X bad therefore thing Y is sacrosanct
literally every internet economics argument ever

>>105745730
No. Once it's over it's over.

>>105745007 (OP)
how is nobody against it?

>>105745007 (OP)
>Why is nobody opposing
remember the injections? yeah, same reason

>>105745062
>First they came for the socialists (aka jews), and I did not speak out—
> Because I was not a socialist nor a jew and they fucking well deserved it
>
> Then they came for the trade unionists (also jews), and I did not speak out—
> Because I was not a trade unionist nor a jew and they fucking well deserved it
>
> Then they came for the rest of the Jews, and I did not speak out—
> Because I was not a Jew and they fucking well deserved it
>Then all was well and prosperity reigned forever and ever, amen
ftfy anon

>>105745767
just cool it with the anti semitic remarks

>>105745509
The anon you are replying to posted that extract from a post-war Lutheran poem in jest. Do you honestly believe that some Jewish anon came to this board for the purpose of referencing that poem, as a sincere response to age verification on pornography web sites? Do you simply have no ability to detect sarcasm, or does copy-pasting catch phrases you've seen on /pol/, in contexts where it doesn't make sense, get you off in some way? How many hours of ESL classes have you completed?

>>105745834
how many times do i have to tell you, im a communist, they came for us before they came for the jews because we are the only threat to capitalism

>>105745767
https://www.amnesty.org.uk/files/2019-01/First%20They%20Came%20by%20Martin%20Niem%C3%B6ller_0.pdf

>>105745007 (OP)
People are against it, but it's inconvenient to the government so it's just ignored.

>>105745062
>why is nobody opposing anything?
Unironically because of the jews.
Fascism is bad, because they oppress jews. The far-right is bad, because they hate jews. The extremist far-left is also bad because they don't care about the jews. Anyone desires to speak freely is bad, because they'll enable the hatred of jews.
The non-uniformed heavily armed men sending random people to prison camps, completely without any responsibility to verify who they're sending or any consequences at all for sending the wrong people? Those people are alright, they love the jews.

>>105745007 (OP)
How exactly do you intend to "oppose"? By typing really hard on a keyboard?
Politicians and the powers that be do whatever the fuck they want.

>>105745947
'jews' love fascism

>>105745986
this has been my point the entire time, and it scares them

>>105745062
>>105745947
>nobody opposes anything anymore
WTF are you two talking about? Arbitrarily disagreeing with everything is basically a core component of most Western societies now. Conservatives shit on liberals. Fascists shit on conservatives. Liberals shit on conservatives and call them fascists. Conservatives shit on liberals and call them fascists. Fascists shit on liberals and call them Jews. Fascists shit on conservatives and call them Jews. Jewish conservatives shit on liberals and call them useful idiots. Jewish liberals shit on conservatives and call them fascists. Socialist shit on Jews and call them ZioNazis. Muslims shit on Jews and call them ZioNazis. Trannies shit on actual women and call them TERFS. Homos shit on straight people and call them breeders. Straight people shit on homos and call them faggots. Whites shit on blacks and call them niggers. Niggers shit on Whites and call them crackers. Whites call Jews likes. Kikes call non-Jews goys. Everyone calls Muslims towel heads or shitskins. Muslims call non-Muslims kafir or dhimmi. It is endless. People are more oppositional and argumentative than ever. They're also dumber, fatter, and lazier than ever.

>>105745740
Where the fuck did I say Capitalism doesn't have problems? See this pic? That's you, and every retarded argument you make.

>>105745726
>real communism hasnt been tried before
See now THIS is literally every internet economics argument ever.

>>105745666
>ZOUNDS
based

>>105745740
>thing X bad therefore thing Y is sacrosanct
X is bad and that's why we use Y, though. X has literally never succeeded.

>>105746586
>Where the fuck did I say Capitalism doesn't have problems?
anon didn't bring up communism either

>>105745007 (OP)
because of (you)

>>105745007 (OP)
>>105745300
we already knew
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-gGLvg0n-uY

>>105745062
because the absolute majority WANTS whats happening

people with "concerns" of any kind, be it technological, political, ethical, you name it, are in the minority.
we are freaks of nature here not the norm

>>105747459
This isn't restricted to AI. Apparently, they're also banning 4chan.

>>105747459
Sad that it's so obvious and so many of us see it coming but there doesn't seem to be anything anyone can do to stop it. Even f we stopped using AI altogether, 8 billion normies would still use it and all of this would still happen either way.

>>105747641
>they're also banning 4chan
it was bound to happen sooner or later. did you think all the fearmongering about it being full to the brim of le evil degens, criminals, and haxors was for nothing? we had a good run; farewell and thanks for all the fish, etc etc

>>105747769
>there doesn't seem to be anything anyone can do to stop it
true, we can avoid it, or spoof identities, but not stop it
>Even f we stopped using AI altogether
local models are improving, and some already are close in quality to the commercial ones, but this is NOT about AI. It's about tracking and controlling the flow of information. AI is the excuse, the invented problem that's used to for this "solution" (govt pedos knowing exactly who owns what account and which websites they are visiting at all times)

>>105745325
brexit was a failure on purpose. The establishment only allowed the referendum to take place because they thought it would fail. They were furious when brexit won, they had no intention of actually leaving the EU, but straight up defying the results of a referendum would be too blatant. They had to leave the EU, but they decided they would punish the British people as much as possible.

>>105745582
very convenient, i gotta go to an american ATM right now

>>105745834
sneed

>>105745062
they wont come for me.
*smug*

>>105746127
Yeah a bunch of meaningless useless arguing while nobody opposes the real problem

>>105745007 (OP)
at this point the only real way to oppose anything in the uk is a medieval style peasants revolt, but you guys are too disorganised and divided to do that so instead you will drown in sea of "new britons" and low quality consumer products to placate you

>>105745219
Why do they need an investigation? They've had years to act on blocking illegal content (loli/shota)

>>105746590
its true tho

>>105748149
how many layers of copium are you on

>>>/pol/
kindly fuck off and die thx

>>105745730
There's always darknets. Tor is obviously the popular one but there's I2P, Freenet, and some others I can't recall the names of. I2P is the best currently, it has a dedicated community and no relay attack issues.

Most of the articles against it read like degenerate chomos trying to defend children having access to porn sites, and that is a real problem just look at gen alpha.
Come up with a better solution to the root problem, for example "it should be illegal for children under 16 to own devices with internet access"

>>105745219
>no more bongs (pajeets and muhammads)
eh could be worse

>>105745062
This is some shit a Jew made up and said is fake and gay but goyim need to me made to act for the benefit of parasites.

>>105745062
and thats why you should go die for israel goy

>>105745007 (OP)
I don't get the opposition, good, no kids or schizos on the internet.

>>105745089
Not everything is feasible to ban.
It's not necessarily desired, either.
They just don't want 10 year olds going on porn sites without any effort, which should be common sense.

>>105745062
>First they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out—
Because the socialists wanted me dead
>Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out—
Because the trade unionists never actually gave a shit about workers
>Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—
I don't really have a strong opinion on jews on their own as opposed to the jews who run everything
>Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me.
They wouldn't come for me and none of the above ever spoke for me

>99% of kids never get exposed to extreme fringe internet porn
>even adults stop consuming that shit because they're afraid it'll be linked to their real identity
based? I don't see any downsides and mental illness will likely plummet

>>105745007 (OP)
>Why is nobody opposing ID requirements for accessing websites?
Because people are opposing it the same way they opposed the vax: they just dont take it and they go somewhere else. It doesn't show up in statistics because there is no engagement to even make a statistical note of in the first place.

Opting out is the first and best line of defense because all it takes is for you to do nothing, and they hate it.

>>105745007 (OP)
Because nobody wants Brits on their website.

>>105751744
boomers get what they fucking deserve when this shit happens to them, shouldn't have sold out society for taco tuesdays

>>105750371
jews?

>>105751671
>lock their heroin away, they'll stop thinking about it eventually
you are... incredibly naive

>>105745062

First they came for us socialists, and you did not speak out—
That's why you will pay after we win.

Then they came for us trade unionists, and you did not speak out—
That's why you will suffer after we win.

Then they came for the Jews, and you did not speak out—
That's why you will be extinct after we win.

Then you lost — and there is no one who is going to save you now.

>>105751704
>duuude just stop using the websites they add ID requirements to
Umm anon that's exactly what they want you to do, that's why they're doing it. Eventually you'll find you have no places left to run to

>>105751785
sorry anon but everyone is going to know you fap to troons, that's just the way it is, crying here won't change that fact

>>105745007 (OP)
>isn't this a little intrusi-
>YOU WANT OUR CHILDREN TO WATCH HARDCORE PORN? WHAT ARE YOU, A PEDOPHILE? YOU WANT TO MOLEST MY KIDS? WHY DO YOU MIND ANYWAY, DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING TO HIDE?

>>105745062
>First they came for murderous jews and I did not speak out because I was not a murderous jew.
>Then they came for the exploitative jews and I did not speak out because I was not a exploitative jew.
>Then they came for the rest of the criminal jews (but I repeat myself) and I did not speak out because I was not a jew.
>Then my homeland and people were safe again, because there were no more jews.
FTFY. You're welcome.

>>105751323
it was a christian pastor

>>105745007 (OP)
Because both "sides" are doing it.
First it was muh regressive red state conservatives and now daddy EU and "liberal democracies" are in on it.

I find it fucking hilarious how freetards and other Stallman privacy types never thought the authoritarians would come for them. It's only corporations that are evil right?

>>105745007 (OP)

It’s the UK. We don’t care about the UK.

>>105751653
>They just don't want 10 year olds going on porn sites without any effort, which should be common sense.

Frog is getting burned slowly. One site at a time.

There will come a point where .onion sites accessed via TOR is the only viable option and entirety of surface web is behind a mandatory Digi-ID verification. Also ISPs will be mandated by law to monitor, flag and ultimately ban customers that are trying to use TOR.

>>105745007 (OP)
I don't live in a police state so it doesn't affect me

I support age restriction for porn. Getting 10 year olds addicted to internet porn is a bad thing.

>>105745007 (OP)
Because people are more concerned about the price of energy, food, housing, and the rapidly diminishing sense of safety on the streets of the UK instead of gay little ID checks that even a caveman can avoid.

>>105754119
That should be the parents' duty - blanket restrictions are both retarded and evil

>>105745007 (OP)
>why nobody protests [bad thing]
I don't know, maybe because humans are actually cattle and da joos are right about us? I stopped arguing and trying to convince others about anything, since it's all pointless

>>105748149
>The establishment only allowed the referendum to take place because they thought it would fail. They were furious when brexit won

Yeah because it was a fucking retarded idea with no upsides for anyone, absolutely no one at any point ever stood to benefit from shitting all over the faces of our closest trading partners and weakening our position.

>>105754135
A blanket internet ban for children is perfect.

>>105745260
American? Did you see the latest supreme court ruling?

>>105754135
Then you'll just criticize parents when kids are 14+ never knowing what pussy is.

>>105747641
>banning 4chan

Honestly this place could do with it, there are far too many sensationalist mouthbreathers. Banning phone users would be ideal.

>>105754159
One of the main reasons for brexit was to reduce immigration, but the politicians decided to punish us and massively increased immigration.

>>105754161
The problem is that it's impossible to enforce without infringing heavily on normal users
>>105754173
I think there's a happy medium between Amish-tier sex education and 12 year olds melting their brains to sissy hypno every night

>>105755282
>The problem is that it's impossible to enforce without infringing heavily on normal users
Jailing parents that let their kids on the internet doesn't infringe on normal users.

>>105745007 (OP)
Citizen apathy on anything except what the TV tells you to care about and what might make you lose friends if you don't care about it is at an all time high. The constant flamewars that continuously proved to be all for nothing have left anyone older than fresh out of college convinced that nothing is worth trying to stop. Also, for most issues you need to pay people to bother enough people hit participation goals that are big enough for the government to care so if there's not enough money in opposing the age gating it's not happening.
Also, if chatbots aren't affected by these laws, we might be seeing them lobbied for by the big AI corpos and their investment money.

>>105755327
Well how do you know they let their kids on the internet, genius?

>>105754040
not xhim, but if you spent a fraction of the time you wasted arguing with people ITT, you would be able to learn how to bypass those bans at least 10 times.

>>105745007 (OP)
Personally if a site requires ID I just won't use it. If there's more people like me then others won't use it and once that site goes under people will use another site that takes advantage of jurisdiction laws to avoid ID requirements. I'm not the one who depends on traffic to my website; the ones who run the websites should be opposing it.

>>105756020
It's not site specific. It's a UK law that "protects the children". The site going down is what they want.

>>105755460
Because the children tattle on them in school.

>>105756057
If the site isn't from the UK I don't see what the problem is. Just change the checkbox to say "I agree that I'm 18 or older and not from the UK"

>>105756197
I think you might be retarded. UK law requires websites to put ID restrictions. It's easier for them to just block the UK entirely.
But the problem is that these "18+" laws becoming the norm will inevitably lead to all websites requiring IDs.

>>105745542
This. Move the server out of the common wealth and what are they gonna do? Invade to cease the server farm?

>>105745007 (OP)
>Why is nobody opposing ID requirements for accessing websites?
> UK will be blocked starting July 24th

lol, the UK is the shithole of the western world.
Those retards have already let their countries be taken over by muslim ideology. Look at Brit bongs, they literary have muslim screaming over and over they took over their country and they call that rap. And that's not considered hate speech.
Meanwhile if anyone criticize that "rapper" in England, the police will put them in jail instead. Tommy was right.

>>105745007 (OP)
all of these kinds of things are widely opposed and unpopular. it just doesn't matter because democracy is a lie; knowing, in this case that the system is corrupt and broken, is half the battle. the other half is extreme violence against the corrupt system.
>>105745062
the actual ending is "and then they realized that almost every problem had been solved so they stopped coming for people"

>>105745007 (OP)
Reminds me of gunfags in the US. They don't care about free speech and freedom of expression, they don't care about the surveillance state, they don't care about the right to peaceful protest, they don't care about the right to a fair trial. The literal one single thing they use their guns for is to protect their right to have guns. What the fuck is the point of guns if you aren't using them to prevent government overreach in every other aspect of life?
Gunniggers should be using their guns to oppose internet ID laws, or anti-encryption laws, or the fucking credit bureaus being allowed to keep a profile on every single citizen without their consent and with no recourse when they inevitably get hacked and your SSN gets leaked.

>>105745007 (OP)
I don't see anything wrong with this

it doesn't really matter if you get your porn from filesharing. the entire US could block it china style and I'd still get it.

>>105745062
so they came for the jews thrice?

>>105745511
>They're hyper-fixated on the internet because they have no real problems to solve
My retarded president is trying to censor the internet, news and social media because "gender political violence", and we still have cartels, they dont care

>>105754119
instead of this, which is annoying for everybody who isn't a child, simply ban all major social media and especially ban minors possibility to have anything more than a dumb phone.
The vast majority of teens use the internet cause of smart phones and their tiktok/whatever account, once you make it illegal for them to have both you pretty much kill completely the flood of teens on the internet.
Ain't no fucking kid gonna start using a desktop pc or a smartphone not in pubblic, even if the parents agree, to browse tiktok without any of their fellow friends on it through a vpn if smartphones were to be banned.
Obviously though the lawmakers actually want to inconvenience everyone, they love the idea of citizens suffering and being humiliated like this.

>>105762970
if the US and EU ban porn, as they seem to want to be doing, you'll still have less services and obviously much less people willing to produce porn since we're the biggest markets.

>>105760966
>i spent the last 40 years kicking gun owners in the nuts at every opportunity
>W-WHY WON'T THEY DO STUFF FOR ME THAT BENEFITS ME? REEEEEEEE

>>105760966
loads of people are in favor of more censorship and surveillance for muh safety and think of the children unfortunately

>>105755390
Don’t you also have thugs going door to door harassing you to pay for owning a tv?

>>105763191
Japan is still the biggest market for pornography.

>>105745007 (OP)
does this let me see which country the user is from?

>>105745007 (OP)
I've spoken out against it. Cuckservatives don't give a fuck and neither to libtards and feminazis. Seems like both sides always are ok coming up with stupid shit to make society worse.

>>105764035

>>105745408
this guy turned 31 yesterday

>>105745666
MIGA

>>105745007 (OP)
these people cant open their windows for more than 10cm without a fine
why would i care

>>105745007 (OP)
Blocking the UK IS opposing it.
I have an adult site. I could comply, taking down a bunch of stuff for being “offensive” and violating the privacy of everyone to make them prove their age.
Nope, told everyone in the UK to get a VPN or fuck off.
When half their sites tell them to fuck off maybe they’ll notice and complain to their government.

>>105754119
Putting it on the individual sites is impressively retarded and exists solely to funnel money to ID verification companies. They literally spent tens of millions lobbying for the stupid shit in the UK.
The non retarded way to do it would be at the device level. Once. Verifying with every site is just ensuring that everyone’s IDs get leaked within a few years.

>>105746127
Nice try terf

>>105747520
This
Thinking is rare
Nice knowing you

>>105745007 (OP)
what do you want me to do, hit kier starmer on the nose with a newspaper and say bad prime minister?

>>105750321
Baby’s first poem :o)

>>105753766
Shut up factcel

>>105763205
I’m also dumb on purpose

>>105745260
They're not unconstitutional anywhere on earth. Every single civilized country already limits access from kids to adult content when it's in physical media. Jews have been let to play their tricks with online pornography for decades. Age verification is coming to all countries and it's a good thing.

>>105764693
Yeah, both sides are pushing for more of a tyrannical Chinese system. Depressing really

>>105765094
Basically this. Turn off the internet for the UK and let them enjoy their great firewall of bongistan.

BongGods need to start upgrading their domestic infrastructure and start being more Independent of external services. Build a home server. Start hoarding.

>>105745062
>Then they came for no one because all the problems were fixed.
ftfy

>>105745266
That wasn't a journalist. That was a literal glowie political agitator who is despised by virtually all of the UKs dissident right. He even changed his name to sound more English and to hide his history and connections.

This wouldn't be possible without shartphones BTW. Throw them out.

>>105765308
And they’re still going to lose to the Chinese because they can’t let go of their baggage.

>surveillance law passed under the guise of think of duh children
why do people eat this shit up every time?

>>105766872
People are retards who vote for even worse complete psychopaths to rule over them. This modern corrupted form of democracy has failed.

>>105765094
This is the way. Just block UK ips. If the zombiefied morons woke up on July 25th and suddenly found they were simultaneously blocked from xhamster, xvideos and pornhub maybe there might be some actual outrage.

>>105745007 (OP)
im surprised theres still such a disapproval of porn in the world, no-fap & self-improvement fags are a pretty small minority. I guess its mostly all the old people who are stil around.

>>105765094
>I have an adult site
always wondered how do you deal with the legalities? unless you produce your own material. Users always upload copyrighted (or otherwise illegal content). Do you just ignore the legal notices until they forcibly shut you down eventually?

>>105767510
Most normal people don't have an issue with porn, but they do agree it probably isn't good for underage people to access it.
It's why before the internet most places wanted an ID before you went into that section of the video store

>>105745062
im the "they" here

>>105767580
but you'd think normies would realize implementing this ID solution would be at the cost of showing the govt. what kind of porn you jerk off to. Which i'd assume most people would be stongly against.

Idk maybe normies are just better people than me and are willing to sacrifice more for childrens health than i am. I just feel like its a pretty big sacrifice.

>>105745046
Fix yourself.

>>105767605
Most people aren't thinking about whether or not the government knows and unless the government mandates they universally track what people watch in addition to the ID check, porn sites aren't going to give that info up voluntarily without a writ or subpoena

Even going back to physical porn, unless your buying outright with cash, the government can compel a store to give up their renting records. They have done it to get a background on a suspect's psych

Okay let's brainstorm
How do we kick kids out of the internet without internet IDs?

My own personal idea is to make it ilegal or a kid to own a smarthphone, and be cause of negligence so parents are now worrried of gettig in trouble

Basically what I meant is to make parents, who dont fucking care, aware that hey can now get in trouble, this way they actually care since that would mean deviating from their daily routine which is what normies hate

>>105767736
>My own personal idea is to make it ilegal or a kid to own a smarthphone
I had the same idea, social media too, no kid is using desktop and anonymous socials

>>105767736
honestly disallowing kids from the internet (only giving them access to isolated things like wikipedia for school and whatnot) would probably improve society a shit ton. Literally the solution to the rising depression issue and whatnot, not just porn addiciton.

But its too totalitarian to ever happen.

>>105767764
>But its too totalitarian to ever happen.
nah, just make it so if you have kids, its a risk to actually be banned from, at home, internet services, until their youngest child is over 18 (or whatever), and every parent suddendly will starts enforcing this themselves,
This also brings back kids to libraries maybe

>>105767736

The problem is parenting.

Today parents use technology as babysitters. The child is distracted by the bright colors of the screen and it is no longer a problem.

Leaving aside the absolute lack of vocation for parenting and focusing directly on the technological area, the relationship between families and technology was different. In the old days, machines were a novelty, they were rare and stationary. This meant that in general, a family had only one machine and it had to be accessible by everyone having to share it and everyone could see more or less what one was doing because it was installed in a point of the house easily accessible to everyone.

I think it is a good strategy to forbid minors to have phones, but it is a useless resource if the parents are useless and do not pay attention to the child in the first place. Without a caring parent, the child will find new ways to become a monster, independent of the access to the means he or she possesses.

Negligent parents will find any excuse to to relieve themselves from the responsibility of taking care of their children and some entities will instrumentalize this search for cheap justification in external means to push for policies of control over the population.

why didn't you just take the normiepill instead of getting involved with weird shit and weird people on the internet?

>>105767862
>>105767888
One big problem is there is a growing sect of the population that otherwise had free access to degeneracy at any age. When some of them eventually become parents, they too will allow the same. Every generation says the same bullshit of they did X when they where young and grew up "fine" so its ok for the kids to do so.

To actually restrict access to something as basic as porn, or restrictions on the internet at large means possible social shaming that the kid is not well adjusted and that parents are being helicopters. Especially when you consider the lengths a parent must go through (Its not just about your kids devices but others)

Not sure if that genie is getting back in the bottle as its ultimately easier for parents to do nothing and let their kids peers guide them wherever. It's especially difficult to instill values for your kids to reject degeneracy when indulging in it becomes a part of fitting in.

>>105767862
One thing to note is that people blame phones, but the child-restrictive services available on both android and iOS are actually quite good. If you set them up with literally the default settings on most devices they're pretty good at allowing parents to control what their kids have access to.

>>105745046
>3D and AI porn
In this case it's for your mental health.

>>105745007 (OP)
same reason everything else is enshittified. 90% of people don't know any better, 9% don't understand why it matters and .9% are bootlickers

>>105767907
you're on 4chan right now. If you don't fear censorship it just means you have nothing interesting to say

>>105767907
>implying Deano doesn't watch porn

>>105768103
or you can just get over the weird-ass American hangup about sex. You'll let them play games where you murder hundreds of people but a nipple is too far, aren't you tired of that stupid bullshit?

>>105745062
based and giga truth pilled.

>>105768244
he probably has a brazzers account.

>>105745062
>Then they came for the Jews
and then all the world's problems were solved and we lived in peace