← Home ← Back to /g/

Thread 105748326

58 posts 16 images /g/
Anonymous No.105748326 [Report] >>105748347 >>105748406 >>105748443 >>105748459 >>105748489 >>105748982 >>105749720 >>105751325 >>105751600 >>105751654 >>105751677 >>105751684 >>105751777 >>105751878 >>105753377
why is gnome so ugly and souless?
kde at least let you add themes and you're encouraged to make the DE yours. Why are faggnomes so against FOSS and theming compared to other desktop enviroments?
look at pic related, is literally and absolutely souless (as if it was made by a jews for goys).
Anonymous No.105748346 [Report] >>105748362
Looks way better than everything else. Knly problem is the app menu, which can easily be replaced with an extension.
Anonymous No.105748347 [Report] >>105748368 >>105748520 >>105748982 >>105751777
>>105748326 (OP)
even old or lightweight desktops look more soulful (made by soulful people for the free men)
Anonymous No.105748362 [Report]
>>105748346
no it doesnt
Anonymous No.105748368 [Report] >>105748394 >>105748520 >>105748982
>>105748347
gnome has something that makes it looks unfun and souless
Anonymous No.105748394 [Report] >>105748520 >>105750092
>>105748368
even unity looks more soulful, look at this, it literally encourages you to do work.
Anonymous No.105748406 [Report]
>>105748326 (OP)
Now that macOS 26 is removing Launchpad, GNOME will most likely follow and get rid of this stupid ass design
Anonymous No.105748443 [Report] >>105748455
>>105748326 (OP)
Never used it, but just looking at it makes me want to hang myself
Anonymous No.105748455 [Report]
>>105748443
as if the desktop was an imitation of their maintainers
Anonymous No.105748459 [Report]
>>105748326 (OP)
usecase for soul?
Anonymous No.105748489 [Report]
>>105748326 (OP)
They do it for free.
All the donations are allocated by the big guys in GNOME Foundation to post pictures of their feet in some random beaches in Africa.
Anonymous No.105748520 [Report] >>105748596
>>105748347
>>105748368
>>105748394
I don't even use gnome but these all look shit and worse
Anonymous No.105748543 [Report] >>105748606
How does one quantify soul?
Please answer
Anonymous No.105748596 [Report] >>105751676
>>105748520
>t.seething ebussy
Anonymous No.105748606 [Report]
>>105748543
less soul is more jewish, more soul is less jewish.
Anonymous No.105748982 [Report] >>105749691
>>105748326 (OP)
>>105748347
>>105748368
"Ugly", "unfun", "soul" and "soulless" are relative terms.
Anonymous No.105749222 [Report]
*krashes*
Anonymous No.105749261 [Report] >>105749686
Because it's designed by uncreative midwits
Anonymous No.105749686 [Report]
>>105749261
and psychopath jews
Anonymous No.105749691 [Report]
>>105748982
>t.jew
>oy vey I can be as soulful as you
Anonymous No.105749705 [Report]
There are only 2 types of DE. The ones everyone complains about and the ones no one uses.
Anonymous No.105749720 [Report]
>>105748326 (OP)
Theming is for faggots. Real men will choose a minimal design all day long.
Anonymous No.105750092 [Report] >>105751096 >>105751600 >>105753326
GNOME is FOSS in name only, FOSS is not a license, its a mindset that GNOME devs do not share in the slightest. GNOME is easily the most antiFOSS "FOSS" software out there.
FOSS is about empowering the user, which isn't just done with source code. nuGNOME is made by retards who are so bad to even get a job at big tech as a diversity hire so they took a otherwise once good desktop that did respect FOSS ideals into their shitty OS X clone.
GNOME is everything wrong with FOSS, they always go out of their way to make it even more unusable than previously imaginable then gaslight users about it, I do not for a second belive that any of them believes or respects even the word of the FOSS licenses they use let alone the spirit, its just a they took what they could get kind of situation, had it been up to them it would be closed source just like everything else is about GNOME. GNOME is a plague on Linux and FOSS and the involved people need to be removed to prevent further harm to the wider FOSS ecosystem.
MATE could never happen today, it would get the Xlibre treatment.
I bet without exception every GNOME maintainer mains FagBooks just like nuMS employees.
Red Hat and Canonical love GNOME for a reason.
>>105748394
Unity is great, Ubuntu died when they switched it.
Anonymous No.105751096 [Report]
>>105750092
they hate foss so much, they call it fascism
Anonymous No.105751304 [Report]
Gnome was redesigned for tablet, heavily compromising desktop experience.
Anonymous No.105751325 [Report]
>>105748326 (OP)
>why is gnome so ugly and souless?
it reminds me of some old fishing boat for whatever reason. maybe its pic related in particular. overall it looks like an electron app with no name applications that look like rip offs from china
Anonymous No.105751600 [Report] >>105751638
>>105750092
>MATE could never happen today
What? GNOME is still FOSS. It is still 100% legal to fork it. I guarantee you that if some team forked GNOME and made the killer Linux desktop, it would get incorporated into distros.
>it would get the Xlibre treatment
Xlibre hasn't yet proven itself. And from what we have seen from its creator so far, it never will.

>>105748326 (OP)
>absolutely soulless
Install Blur my Shell and re-take the screenshot.
Anonymous No.105751638 [Report] >>105751690
>>105751600
and the extensions app comes shipped with the desktop?
Anonymous No.105751654 [Report]
>>105748326 (OP)
isn't that a mac thing? rocket launchpad something something
Anonymous No.105751676 [Report]
>>105748596
I use KDE
Anonymous No.105751677 [Report]
>>105748326 (OP)
Why does this image combine old icons and new icons, also who even uses Empathy nowadays
Anonymous No.105751684 [Report] >>105751953
>>105748326 (OP)
Because GNOME is corporate Linux. GNOME and Wayland are designed to be restricted and safe for enterprise machines.
Anonymous No.105751690 [Report] >>105751723
>>105751638
https://apps.gnome.org/Extensions/
Anonymous No.105751723 [Report] >>105751761 >>105751930 >>105752537
>>105751690
comes shipped by default with the desktop?
Anonymous No.105751761 [Report] >>105751769 >>105752537
>>105751723
Depends on your distro. I linked you to an official GNOME app.
Anonymous No.105751769 [Report] >>105751793 >>105752537
>>105751761
so if i install it, it doesn't come by default
Anonymous No.105751777 [Report]
>>105748326 (OP)
It's made by a corporation for jeet wageslaves.
>>105748347
That file manager is awful I sure hope that's not default.
Anonymous No.105751793 [Report] >>105751799 >>105752537
>>105751769
Yeah. If you're using a distro that doesn't ship it by default. Duh.
Anonymous No.105751799 [Report] >>105751808
>>105751793
so they dont care, if they cared it would be shipped by default.
Anonymous No.105751808 [Report] >>105751833
>>105751799
>he doesn't know how distros work
Anonymous No.105751833 [Report] >>105751842
>>105751808
>they care soo much to not ship it by default
Anonymous No.105751842 [Report] >>105751852
>>105751833
Bro are you retarded? GNOME doesn't decide what distros ship. Fedora ships the Extensions app by default. Another distro might not. This isn't hard to understand.
Anonymous No.105751852 [Report] >>105752489
>>105751842
>bro you retarded
>they care soo much to not ship it by default
Anonymous No.105751878 [Report]
>>105748326 (OP)
made by ugly "people" with no soul
Anonymous No.105751930 [Report]
>>105751723
yeah
Anonymous No.105751953 [Report] >>105753345
>>105751684
>be wagie
>get forced to use a tablet UI for work
>*grashes*
grim
Anonymous No.105752400 [Report]
Ok now post a soulful DE
Anonymous No.105752489 [Report]
>>105751852
He's right, you're being retarded. How do you propose gnome dictate that distros include the extensions app by default?
Anonymous No.105752520 [Report] >>105752947
It just works*

*ᵃᵈᵈᶦᵗᶦᵒnᵃˡ 20 ᵉˣᵗᵉnˢᶦᵒnˢ ᵃʳᵉ ʳᵉᵠᵘᶦʳᵉᵈ
Anonymous No.105752537 [Report]
>>105751723
>>105751761
>>105751769
>>105751793

Gnometards are in a cult
>>105701792
Anonymous No.105752915 [Report] >>105752926
how to sort applications list alphabetically?
Anonymous No.105752926 [Report]
>>105752915
Usecase of sorting applications list alphabetically?
Anonymous No.105752947 [Report]
>>105752520
Why does their Whisker Menu look like an Android launcher?
Anonymous No.105753326 [Report]
>>105750092
>FOSS is what an idiot neet 4channer wants it to be
>FOSS is not what hundreds of developers working on it tell you it is
Anonymous No.105753345 [Report] >>105753391
>>105751953
There's a lot wrong with gnome but krashes are a kde exclusive
Anonymous No.105753377 [Report]
>>105748326 (OP)
Why does it use a tablet UI? I tried it out but I don't get who would deliberately use a tablet UI on their desktop.
Anonymous No.105753391 [Report] >>105753448
>>105753345
I just had nautilus grash on me when I connected to my phone via ftp
Anonymous No.105753448 [Report]
>>105753391
(You) Problem