← Home ← Back to /g/

Thread 105755320

21 posts 12 images /g/
Anonymous No.105755320 [Report] >>105755409 >>105755562 >>105755602 >>105755979
We won, Lundukebros.
Anonymous No.105755333 [Report] >>105755367 >>105758584 >>105759968
>MUH BIDO GAEMS BING BING WAHOOO
Anonymous No.105755367 [Report] >>105755417 >>105755860 >>105760013
>>105755333
>nooo, not my heccing corporeninos!!!!!
bootlicker
Anonymous No.105755409 [Report] >>105755882
>>105755320 (OP)
>WE WON LUDITE FREETARDS!!! LET'S KEEP BLOAT AND PREVENT 64 BIT IMPROVEMENT!
Anonymous No.105755417 [Report]
>>105755367
who quote?
Anonymous No.105755562 [Report] >>105756011
>>105755320 (OP)
> $ dnf repoquery "*.i686" | wc -l
> 11501
Most retarded "win" of the century.
All we need is the 100(?) i686 packages required for steam.
EVERYTHING ELSE can go.
Anonymous No.105755602 [Report] >>105755870 >>105761226
>>105755320 (OP)
A long time ago, to try to catapult his own career, Lunduke tried to ruin Stallman's life. This was over a decade ago before others started doing it.

He had this weird video podcast called "Linux Action Show" or some shit, where he portrayed himself as a free software supporter and educator, except all he did was attack free software.

In one episode, Stallman said what he has always said for decades. That proprietary developers will have to find a new job if freedom wins.

Lunduke (a proprietary dev) only pretends to like freedom. He doesn't know what freedom is. The only thing he knows about it is that it's "open source".

That's why Lunduke was so vividly furious when he found out what Stallman said.

Instead of arguing against Stallman's statement, he spent the rest of the interview and in the next videos digging up Stallman's posts about age of consent and claiming that Stallman hates children and wants to starve children to death because children can't survive without proprietary work.
Anonymous No.105755860 [Report]
>>105755367
Yes in fact, not my heccing corporerinos.
Anonymous No.105755870 [Report] >>105755903
>>105755602
Just admit you are trans already.
Anonymous No.105755882 [Report]
>>105755409
64-bit improvement? How can 64bit improve from dropping i386? i mean sure there will be wasted resources on keeping i386 but how the fuck is that going to make 64 better. Ain't it already what it is with minor improvements like x86_64v4 and shit? but i don't see how that depends on i386 being killed
Anonymous No.105755900 [Report]
Why can't you just run steam through flatpak?
Anonymous No.105755903 [Report]
>>105755870
Just admit you are too cheap to buy an ad already.
Anonymous No.105755979 [Report]
>>105755320 (OP)
>but muh bideo gamus, muh belloto

There are embedded systems using 32bit, in factory appliances or instrumentation systems
Anonymous No.105756011 [Report] >>105756049
>>105755562
>required for steam
There's nothing stopping Steam from compiling for 64bit.
Anonymous No.105756049 [Report] >>105756087
>>105756011
I WISH THEY DID
Anonymous No.105756087 [Report]
>>105756049
even on windows they don't.
It's only x86_64 bit on mac.
They haven't even bothered with Apple Silicon.
Anonymous No.105758584 [Report]
>>105755333
>MUH BIDO GAEMS BING BING WAHOOO
Anonymous No.105759968 [Report]
>>105755333
Go start a fucking WOW64 project equivalent for linux if you care so much about removing 32bit libs. Either that or keep seething.
Anonymous No.105760013 [Report]
>>105755367
Who are you quoting?
Anonymous No.105760065 [Report]
Anonymous No.105761226 [Report]
>>105755602
Did he trick Stallman into eating his toe jam?