Anonymous
6/30/2025, 5:50:12 PM No.105755320
We won, Lundukebros.
Replies:
Thread 105755320 - /g/ [Archived: 610 hours ago]
Anonymous
6/30/2025, 5:51:25 PM No.105755333
>MUH BIDO GAEMS BING BING WAHOOO
Replies:
Anonymous
6/30/2025, 5:54:45 PM No.105755367
Replies:
Anonymous
6/30/2025, 5:57:51 PM No.105755409
Replies:
Anonymous
6/30/2025, 5:58:33 PM No.105755417
>>105755367
who quote?
who quote?
Anonymous
6/30/2025, 6:11:10 PM No.105755562
>>105755320 (OP)
> $ dnf repoquery "*.i686" | wc -l
> 11501
Most retarded "win" of the century.
All we need is the 100(?) i686 packages required for steam.
EVERYTHING ELSE can go.
> $ dnf repoquery "*.i686" | wc -l
> 11501
Most retarded "win" of the century.
All we need is the 100(?) i686 packages required for steam.
EVERYTHING ELSE can go.
Replies:
Anonymous
6/30/2025, 6:14:33 PM No.105755602
>>105755320 (OP)
A long time ago, to try to catapult his own career, Lunduke tried to ruin Stallman's life. This was over a decade ago before others started doing it.
He had this weird video podcast called "Linux Action Show" or some shit, where he portrayed himself as a free software supporter and educator, except all he did was attack free software.
In one episode, Stallman said what he has always said for decades. That proprietary developers will have to find a new job if freedom wins.
Lunduke (a proprietary dev) only pretends to like freedom. He doesn't know what freedom is. The only thing he knows about it is that it's "open source".
That's why Lunduke was so vividly furious when he found out what Stallman said.
Instead of arguing against Stallman's statement, he spent the rest of the interview and in the next videos digging up Stallman's posts about age of consent and claiming that Stallman hates children and wants to starve children to death because children can't survive without proprietary work.
A long time ago, to try to catapult his own career, Lunduke tried to ruin Stallman's life. This was over a decade ago before others started doing it.
He had this weird video podcast called "Linux Action Show" or some shit, where he portrayed himself as a free software supporter and educator, except all he did was attack free software.
In one episode, Stallman said what he has always said for decades. That proprietary developers will have to find a new job if freedom wins.
Lunduke (a proprietary dev) only pretends to like freedom. He doesn't know what freedom is. The only thing he knows about it is that it's "open source".
That's why Lunduke was so vividly furious when he found out what Stallman said.
Instead of arguing against Stallman's statement, he spent the rest of the interview and in the next videos digging up Stallman's posts about age of consent and claiming that Stallman hates children and wants to starve children to death because children can't survive without proprietary work.
Replies:
Anonymous
6/30/2025, 6:37:42 PM No.105755882
>>105755409
64-bit improvement? How can 64bit improve from dropping i386? i mean sure there will be wasted resources on keeping i386 but how the fuck is that going to make 64 better. Ain't it already what it is with minor improvements like x86_64v4 and shit? but i don't see how that depends on i386 being killed
64-bit improvement? How can 64bit improve from dropping i386? i mean sure there will be wasted resources on keeping i386 but how the fuck is that going to make 64 better. Ain't it already what it is with minor improvements like x86_64v4 and shit? but i don't see how that depends on i386 being killed
Anonymous
6/30/2025, 6:39:16 PM No.105755900
Why can't you just run steam through flatpak?
Anonymous
6/30/2025, 6:39:32 PM No.105755903
>>105755870
Just admit you are too cheap to buy an ad already.
Just admit you are too cheap to buy an ad already.
Anonymous
6/30/2025, 6:49:14 PM No.105755979
>>105755320 (OP)
>but muh bideo gamus, muh belloto
There are embedded systems using 32bit, in factory appliances or instrumentation systems
>but muh bideo gamus, muh belloto
There are embedded systems using 32bit, in factory appliances or instrumentation systems
Anonymous
6/30/2025, 6:53:08 PM No.105756011
Replies:
Anonymous
6/30/2025, 6:58:46 PM No.105756087
>>105756049
even on windows they don't.
It's only x86_64 bit on mac.
They haven't even bothered with Apple Silicon.
even on windows they don't.
It's only x86_64 bit on mac.
They haven't even bothered with Apple Silicon.
Anonymous
7/1/2025, 1:05:56 AM No.105759968
>>105755333
Go start a fucking WOW64 project equivalent for linux if you care so much about removing 32bit libs. Either that or keep seething.
Go start a fucking WOW64 project equivalent for linux if you care so much about removing 32bit libs. Either that or keep seething.
Anonymous
7/1/2025, 1:10:25 AM No.105760013
>>105755367
Who are you quoting?
Who are you quoting?
Anonymous
7/1/2025, 1:15:45 AM No.105760065
Anonymous
7/1/2025, 3:44:21 AM No.105761226
>>105755602
Did he trick Stallman into eating his toe jam?
Did he trick Stallman into eating his toe jam?