No refunds

i've been hearing that for 40 years now

>>105762828 (OP)
Im a plumber

>reddit screenshot thread

>>105762833
Two weeks

>>105762828 (OP)
if you work for free then you won't be replaced.

>>105762858
two weeks is less than a year wtf

>>105762830
Not true. 40 years ago ai was about beating top chess players, now we have agents who can produce working code, videos with audio,... This is totally a new world and you will not be part of it.

>>105762828 (OP)
Again, it’s not even close to beating Pokemon. Simple logical and visual puzzles are stumping it.
I’m not saying that day won’t come, BUT keep in mind what we’re talking about here: enterprise applications where an error can cause a massive data breach or worse. And since it’s all automated, imagine having to find where the issue occurred when no actual engineer wrote the code or is intimately familiar with the application repository.

AND even 40 years ago, tech companies were putting out false advertising to promote just how “advanced” their products were. AI is no different. The data and output these companies push out are obviously massaged to look immaculate and production ready.

You should definitely be using these tools in your day to day, but anyone thinking that they can replace a sales or dev team of 100 people with 100 AIs is asking to collapse.

>>105762828 (OP)
Within the past year and a half or so, something I've really nooooticed is that whenever some kind of fuckup happens in the tech sector you end up with several damage control threads hyping up AI as this omnipotent supergod in the catalog, so I'm wondering what bad news happened this time that's trying to be swept under the rug

>>105762828 (OP)
>From the people who told you that Trump was literally Hitler
>Produced by the people who told you that Trump's tariffs would instantly obliterate the USA
>Featuring fear-mongering by the people who told you COVID was going to obliterate 95% of the population
Who cares what some literalwho brownie fat fuck thinks? Whatever happens, happens.

Good time to get a real job like your father wanted

>>105763108
>strawman
>strawman
>strawman
>"random social media person said something dumb about something they don't understand therefore all the world's AI experts are wrong"

>>105763136
>2021: AI is coming for your job!
>2022: AI is coming for your job!
>2023: AI is coming for your job!
>2024: AI is coming for your job!
>2025: AI is coming for your job! <--- You are here
two more weeks surely

>>105763146
Give links to leading experts saying it'll come "next year" in 2021. I'll wait.

>>105763146
Coming as its on its way there, ESLvro

>>105763160
>the burden of proof is on YOU to disprove my spurious claims
not how it works retard

>>105763169
I'm not OP. You implied leading experts were saying roughly the same thing in 2021. Now prove it. If they didn't say the same thing, your "point" is irrelevant.

>>105762828 (OP)
AI is nothing compared to microservices and protobuf, retard.

>>105763319
Care to provide an argument?

>>105763331
They're the future of computer science and software development. Do you want me to expand on it?

>>105763351
Explain how microservices are akin to being able to do any screen-requiring job cheaper and better than any human

>>105762828 (OP)
How will ai replacy my NEETing?

>>105762828 (OP)
emad is a grifter that managed to almost bankrupt stable diffusion and then disappeared to grift crypto afterwards

>No refunds
That's what Luigi should've etched on his bullets instead.

>>105763362
They'll probably use AI to apply for benefits, if they aren't already.

>>105762828 (OP)
Next year? Whew, I though I only had two more weeks

>>105762975
Fifty years ago, it was SQL that was the hot new thing that was going to do away with "system analysts". Managers could ask questions in an easy to use English like language to get the data they needed without requiring a programmer. Then managers encountered joins and that was the end of that. SQL made things easier for programmers but managers still needed programmers.
Over the past half century, dozens of new things have come around that was going to eliminate the need for programmers. Many simply disappeared, others were adopted by programmers, making things easier for them and opening the career to a larger pool of less intelligent programmers. But the need for them never went away, it increased instead.
>But it's different this time.
Sure, it might be but that's what was believed every other time too. In the end, managers aren't interested in getting their hands dirty and exercising their brains by getting into specifics instead of the vague notions they typically communicate to employees. Ultimately, that's what software development is about: converting manager head canon into something the computer can use to produce a product. LLMs so far aren't able to do this any better than humans. They can churn out lots of source code quickly, but they still can't figure out management intent very well. Perhaps that will change. Perhaps not. Time will tell.

>>105763160
https://bernardmarr.com/the-7-biggest-artificial-intelligence-ai-trends-in-2022/

Many such cases.

>>105762828 (OP)
>Saaar, ChatGPT wrote a python script I wasn't able to write. It also did the nedful and programmed snake game in 2.5 seconds. Saar, your job will be redeemed, AI is next super poopa

this guy spent 100 million dollars and produced zero good models

>>105762828 (OP)
Sorry, Arjun, I'm never gonna fall for your tard-fueled hyperbole, no matter how much they pay your call center for slave labor.

can't even solve tower of hanoi

>>105764123
Lmao

>>105762828 (OP)
>Emad Mostaque
Ages 20 years in just 2 years
Chicken fat is a helluva drug.

AI has already mind broken Wikipedians. They are mad that ChatGPT.com took their place in the "top 5 websites". Plus AI talks about BFDI and Chrischan which Wikipedia censors.

>>105762828 (OP)
>get rid of all the jobs
>won't get rid of all the expenses
Yes that sounds like a great plan

heres whats going to happen. Everyone will lose theyre screen jobs in 10 years tops, on the mean time everyone will flood the trades driving the wages down. By the time the 10 years are up theyll lose those too to a robot yes a robot.

>>105764476
And then what?
No more jobs but the rents are 7k a month

>>105764482
then everyone gets ubi and slow culling via vasectomies and stuff i think

>>105764476
Good morning, sir.

>>105762828 (OP)
Reminder:
We can fix all of these problems by renting some excavators, picking up some garden chemicals, and buying a couple of bricks of .22 LR.
The technocracy is a choice.

>>105764500
>ubi
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

>>105764565
Anon I could fix the problem right now
I work in a data center lmao
Prison doesn't sound fun though

>>105762828 (OP)
in the book Flash Boys about high-frequency trading on Wall Street, a russian guy is talked about and interviewed. he learned to program in russia in in the 90s when computer time was rationed and allocated and so he and other russians programmed computer code by writing on paper and then when they had their hour on the computer they typed in in and ran it to see if it worked.
computer programming is done in the mind, not on a screen. the jeet in the pic is confusing things which use a screen as part of the process with things which are done totally on a screen.

you can't even get The Perfect Button for a website by proompting because the button being perfect for what you need requires some human to define and refine.

>>105764604
UBI logically and clearly follows after AI replaces our jobs
This what AI haters dont get, being replaced by AI fully means we'll be living in a utopia where anyone can do what they wish to pass the time

>>105764467
It is, but not for your kind.

>>105764659
>utopia
Based on what precedent lmao

>>105764659
>UBI
midwit dogwhistle

unless you literally replace 100% of all work, media influencers, political positions, etc. with AI, all UBI will achieve is vast inequality. if you're just some retard on UBI and your neighbor is still working as a doctor or a councilman then he's going to be infinitely more powerful than you socially and financially. the disparity is so apparent and clear that either he's going to undermine you or you're going to overthrow him. it's not a stable social structure.

the real job solution is to use the surplus of wealth to empower make-work that may some day become a real work that people might want. thats how we got jobs like interior decorator and podcaster

>>105764748
>it's not a stable social structure.
Good.

>>105762836
Yes

>>105763362
by being even more lazy and unmotivated than any human being ever could be

neat

>>105763160
When copilot was in beta they were saying that it will replace everybody in 2 years.
https://www.bbc.com/news/business-57914432

>>105764841
this has to be parody

>>105765893
Or it's a clever triple-murder plan.
>the bull is dying
>now kill the bitch and the scum growing inside of her

>>105763362
By spending the money wasted on your welfare cheque to power AI datacenters instead.

So none of you ever made it to the second chapter of Mein Kampf?

>>105763160
in 2023 the CEO of Anthropic was saying how in 2 years AI would be so advanced that it would replace many, many jobs, including developers.
It replaced exactly zero people, just made things easier.

>>105766140
Why read it when we're all living it?
>>105766194
>It replaced exactly zero people,
Hiring probably has been impacted, even if for no reason other than they have an excuse to push existing employees harder rather than bringing in additional labor.

>>105766194
The year is 2027 now.
Truly 2 more years, lmao.

>>105766220
>Why read it when we're all living it?
Because it tells you where the journey will end, too. Vienna in the early 1910s was HELL.

>>105764089
It seems unrealistic to expect AI to be able to fully structure programs from nothing any time soon. It just requires too much context and too much agency. I'm not sure AI will ever be able to hold new abstractions in context while implementing new ones and balancing them against old. A human can do that just fine, for the most part. We're more than happy to black box things until we need them, and with practice we can be decent at managing our working memory by choosing which parts to abstract and which to implement -- and which is necessary based on current conditions.

There's no evidence AI will be able to do this any time soon, if ever. As such, it makes very little sense from an industrial standpoint to eliminate entry level jobs -- you'll just diminish for the sake of profit today the pool of talent you'll need tomorrow.

The problem is that rational individuals almost always act irrationally for the aggregate, and that's what will probably happen in the near term. Thanks, VC bros.

>>105766220
They'll eventually have to bring in new labor. It's just a matter of time.

Just ask your local LLM to come up with an AVX algorihm that converts raw data into an hexadecimal + ASCII representation.

It will fail miserably because no one has fed it any data that provides information on how to do it.

>>105764101
>>105765819
Not mentioned anywhere in the article.
>>105766194
Source or it never happened

>>105762828 (OP)
No.
I will replace all the tech companies with my 1.000.000X engineering skills acquired by AI.
If this shit is half as good as they promised, I will build the next twitter, IG and Tiktok and make trillions.

>>105769610
Nah. Someone who's better than you will do though.

>>105766483
>no one has fed it any data that provides information on how to do it.

This. There is no 'intelligence' just expert regurgitation.