← Home ← Back to /g/

Thread 105769882

16 posts 10 images /g/
Anonymous No.105769882 [Report] >>105769900 >>105770309 >>105770424 >>105770430 >>105770528 >>105772443 >>105772807
Install OpenBSD
Anonymous No.105769900 [Report] >>105770481 >>105772422 >>105772807
>>105769882 (OP)
sorry im home already
Anonymous No.105770309 [Report] >>105770424 >>105770424 >>105770424 >>105770424 >>105770424 >>105770424
>>105769882 (OP)
>cuck license
>shit performance
>no mandatory access control
>filesystem sucks
>security through "mitigation" instead of separation
>no memory tagging
>no reproducible builds
buy an ad, Theo.
Anonymous No.105770424 [Report] >>105771184
>>105769882 (OP)
based and redpilled

>>105770309
>>cuck license
you are cucked by Stallman - can't do what ever you want with the code gifted to you

>>105770309
>shit performance
doesn't batter

>>105770309
>>no mandatory access control
what do you mean?
what it lacks exactly?
also, there are advanced control options such as unveil

>>105770309
>>security through "mitigation" instead of separation
wut?

>>105770309
>>no memory tagging
what would it do and how?
you mean like W^X from Pax for linux?
doesn't they do that? pretty sure they do even windows does

>>105770309
>>no reproducible builds
this is a bit goncerning
welll, join and help then
Anonymous No.105770430 [Report]
>>105769882 (OP)
but I already did.
Anonymous No.105770481 [Report] >>105770522 >>105772422
>>105769900
I was kind of surprised by NetBSD when I checked it out. I feel like everyone says FreeBSD is the best option when it comes to software avalibility but I think NetBSD is right there.
Anonymous No.105770522 [Report]
>>105770481
freebsd is just linux at this point.
Anonymous No.105770528 [Report] >>105772807
>>105769882 (OP)

Why OpenBSD over FreeBSD? I feel like FreeBSD is the only branch that get any love
Anonymous No.105771184 [Report] >>105771272
>>105770424
>>>no mandatory access control
>what do you mean?
>what it lacks exactly?
>also, there are advanced control options such as unveil
ChatGPT-kun, MAC is a security tool, not control options kek
>>>security through "mitigation" instead of separation
>wut?
OpenBSD devs jerk off to the fact that they "patch" / "mitigate" security vulnerabilites (evendoe some retarded jeet at apple (siguza or qwertyoruiopz i think) managed to bypass their "cutting edge" "state-of-the-art" TRAPSLED mitigation kek).
>>>no memory tagging
>what would it do and how?
>you mean like W^X from Pax for linux?
>Theo thinks MTE is W^X or PAX
topkek
Buy an ad, Theo.

Also,

stop

redditspacing

NIGGER
Anonymous No.105771272 [Report]
>>105771184
>ChatGPT-kun, MAC is a security tool, not control options kek
ok so you can't explain your point.
opinion discarded
Anonymous No.105772422 [Report] >>105772846 >>105772890
>>105769900
>>105770481
I just checked out the pkgsrc site and it has pretty much all of the things I would be looking for. How is hardware support in your experience?
Anonymous No.105772443 [Report]
>>105769882 (OP)
>no drivers
>no drivers
>no drivers
Anonymous No.105772807 [Report]
>>105769882 (OP)
>>105769900
>>105770528
cuck license
Anonymous No.105772846 [Report] >>105772890
>>105772422
>How is hardware support in your experience?
should be fine if you are using an AMD gpu.
Anonymous No.105772890 [Report]
>>105772422
>>105772846
Intel or AMD*
Anonymous No.105773030 [Report]
>openbsd haters are the same newfags who have meltdowns over two newlines

Kekeroni and cheese