>why is it so good bros?

>>105789585 (OP)
Like it was discussed in the other thread, old JPG encoders suck. We should be encouraging people to use jpegli instead.

It's not, google lost
TOTAL WEBP DEATH

The only reason I don't like it is because 4chuds doesn't support it (yet)

>>105789585 (OP)
cuz it's free

it's not
png 4 life

>>105789585 (OP)
Even Normalfags hate Webp tho

>>105791387
Big file sizes.

>>105791774
Yeah but normalfags are 99% tech retards who can't even into SSIM thoughbeit. See >>105789660

I HIGHLY doubt they even know that jpegli even exists let alone know how to use it.

>>105789660
it's better but .webp is still superior so I don't understand the point

>>105792027
The difference between jpegli and webp isn't as dramatic and I think most people would agree that it's "good enough" and webp isn't worth adopting.

That way we can skip straight to jpeg xl or avif i stead of hoping around 12 different image formats.

>>105789585 (OP)
It's just inconvenient.

>>105789585 (OP)
yeah nah, I like the 90s porn image vibe. It's libjpeg-turbo for me

nice format, has support for decent lossy and lossless, transparency and animation. Only reason people hate it is because windooze cant handle it

>>105789585 (OP)
Cons:
-I can't upload it to 4chan.
-Can't save it as .webp in MSpaint.

Pros:
+Good for websites because of file size.

>>105792155
Yeah I'd agree with that.

Honestly, I just don't fuicking care anymore
>b-b-b-but muh 3% space saving or b-better chroma!
Nigger, I just don't care anymore. mp3, aac, jpeg, png... it's all just a fucking image that I want to quickly look at or song that I want to listen to.

>>105795671
The problem is websites don't want to spend a lot of money to give you free images/videos so it's better if they use better lossy compression so that when they do go for the lowest tolerable file size it won't look like complete diarrhea which is exactly what happens with JPGs right now.

>>105795671
Then try using image viewer that is newer than 2010, faggot.

>>105789585 (OP)
>save the website not the image
you fucking trannies ruined everything

>>105789585 (OP)
It's not, it's placebo

>>105789660
>>105795797
put your trip on, daiz/pixdaiz/ss2/jonsneeders/fixlives

>>105798132
I'm going to bump this thread until someone takes my keyboard and mouse from my cold dead hands. I don't even like Webp.

>>105798132

No, I am not any of the above.

>>105789585 (OP)

> why is it so good bros?

Because libwebp v1.6.0-rc1 has lossless compression improvements.

The attached PNG can now be compressed to 28682 bytes losslessly (see https://qu.ax/HZVUp.webp for the proof), even JPEG XL could not do that last time I checked.

>>105799537
Anyone who isn't a braindamaged newfag knows you've been making these threads multple times every day for years.