>idles at 50W because AMD cant into monolithic chip design
Why is Ryzen so shit at power efficiency even after 10 years? You go back to the Bulldozer CPUs, same shit with high idle wattages.

They have chips that idle at less, What the fuck are you talking about?

>>105817699
>They have chips that idle at less
Name 1 (one) performance segment desktop CPU that is capable of idling at levels comparable to Intel CPUs.

>>105817727
>8nm chip with 3.5 clock idles lower than a 4nm chip with 4.5 clock
much wow

>>105817763
OP is a broke thirdy seething over parts availability

>>105817672 (OP)
M4 Max 14-Core CPU & 32-Core GPU idles at 6w and desktop stuff runs with multiple 4k vids and whatever around 6-20W. Come home frugal male.

>>105817672 (OP)
Intel chip is written in buggyC++.
AMD chip is written in Lisp.

>>105817763
You are a brown third world shitskin frog poster nigger.
I have both a 6850U (6nm) and a 7840U (4nm) ThinkPad, both with 14 inch 400 nit low power screens.
On Windows power saver mode, they have the same idle.
If I downclock the 7840U to match the clocks of the 6850U, then the 7840U has a lower idle.

op is a faggot liar

>>105817672 (OP)
buy a monolithic Ryzen then dipshit
they exist and are efficient

>50w idle
I wonder if blatant lying counts as trolling outside of /b/. We're about to find out.
>>105817868
Yeah yeah, post screenshot retard. Nobody believes you.

maybe there's too much ohmmages

>>105817672 (OP)
Sir, both depicted APUs are monolithic and idle at less than 10 watts.

>>105817672 (OP)
does a chiplet design use more power at idle than monolithic?
yes
does it use 50 watts at idle? no, unless you are a retard running 1.3v SoC and c-states disabled
my 5700x idles at 12 watts, 18-20w under light loads
barely more than the monolithic 2600 I was running years ago.
>>105818020
yeah, plus the "you go back to the Bulldozer CPUs, same shit with high idle wattages." part makes no fucking sense, of course bulldozer wasn't monolithic and it just had poor power efficiency overall, it's like op discovered this new concept/word on reddit and now somehow thinks everything revolves around this.

>>105817938
>>Nobody believes you.
>SARR ONLY ELON MUSK AFFORD TWO LAPTOPS, SARR YOU ARE LIE
Kys Raj.

>>105818060
>of course bulldozer wasn't monolithic
of course bulldozer wasn't chiplet*
>>105817931
this too.
dunno about the newer gens, but the ryzen 5500/5700 non-x plus all the G ones are monolithic
sure they are quite shitty compared to the regular ones in terms of processing power, but like yeah that's the advantage of a chiplet design, it makes faster cpus cheaper to make.

>>105817796
OP realized that he should have bought Intel instead of Poozen with its high voltages, idle wattage, peak wattage, degredation, and other jank.

>>105817763
>8nm chip with 3.5 clock idles lower than a 4nm chip with 4.5 clock
No it doesn't.
>>105818060
>unless you are a retard running 1.3v SoC
No it doesn't, also wrong.
>c-states disabled
This is a cope.

>>105818535
>Buy inteltelaviv goyim, and enjoy your computer being directly linked to gaysrael! Chai israel! Bharat are lions too sar!

>>105817672 (OP)
my home server runs on AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 4650G and the cpu idles at 3.5W
you have to specifically choose a cpu + motherboard combo if you aim for low power consumption. the whole server idles at less than 15W measured at the wall

I've finally seen it all. You're all so autistic for computers you worry about idle power instead of getting your linux desktop working.

>>105818553
>No it doesn't, also wrong.
...what does that even mean?
a retard running 1.3v SoC... it doesn't, and wrong?
what? what the fuck are you saying
>c-states disabled: This is a cope.
again... what the fuck do you mean?

>>105818570
How's that compared to 5700G? I bought it for my home server and the whole server without disks draws around 20 watts from the wall. I didn't tinker much with it though, just enabled C states. What did you do to get to those levels?

>>105818569
>and enjoy your computer being directly linked to gaysrael
As opposed to using Microsoft Pluton and AMD's PSP?

>>105817938
>I wonder if blatant lying counts as trolling outside of /b/
Check /pcbg/ for a literal example someone posted of AMD CPUs idling high

>>105817813
Meanwhile people who got duped by ayymdrones on youtube and put ayymdhousefires into their systems since 2019 will be running CPUs that idle anywhere from a 25w minimum (Ryzen CPUs on desktop CANNOT go longer than this due to IF links being prevented from idling and the I/O die being on a less efficient node) to 35, 40, or 50W when using desktop applications (often correlated with the effects these windows applications have on timers, beyond windows power plan settings) even if they tune their CPUs to cap them at base clocks only and at low voltages (under 1.25V, meanwhile intel CPus idled in the milivolt range on desktop, kek)
All of that just for their Ryzen 7 chips to be score less than an M1 chip in cinebench despite using 100-150W of power, kek

>>105818586
>seething about linux out of nowhere

>>105818729
>How's that compared to 5700G?
idk, but i use it as mainly a media server and DNS, and it handles everything without issues including 4K media playback. running smooth with 238 days uptime atm, for a total of 2 years or so

>What did you do to get to those levels?
i also didn't tinker much, mostly just copied this guy's build with some modifications due to component availability.
he actually reported sub 10W idle:
https://www.computerbase.de/forum/threads/renoir-und-b550-die-idle-kuenstler.1967755/
i think there's a thread on a different german forum where they obsess over this kind of idle efficiency stuff and list more builds. it sounds like something german autists would do.

>>105817672 (OP)
But thats wrong you fucking retard. The APUs have markedly better idle power than the mainstream CPUs because they have their own internal chipset. Laptops can idle at w or less depending on how the system is configured and the board is built.

>>105819201
How many VMs and containers are you running?

>>105819201
>I think there's a thread on a different german forum where they obsess over this kind of idle efficiency stuff and list more builds
Do you have the link?

>>105819658
no virtualization, i tried to keep it simple stupid so just installed the whole arr stack and adguard home on ubuntu server
have enough headaches from docker at work so i just wanted to not fuck around with it at home as well

>>105819772
i think it's this one but i don't speak german:
https://www.hardwareluxx.de/community/threads/alltagstaugliche-desktop-systeme-mit-6w-idle-verbrauch-inkl-haswell-beispiel.1001484/page-67

>>105817699
>What the fuck are you talking about?
a long-standing issue on ryzen, are you fucking new on this planet?
your favorite high school dropout low-iq basedtuber did not talk about it? what shame

>>105817672 (OP)
>be boughted a ryzen after the major degradation and instability issues became apparent on zen 2 onwards in addition to the wattage
ohnnononono

7950X with tdp lowered to 105W, undervolted and a browser opened

>>105817672 (OP)
IO and CCD on the same die? Yeah that's going to be expensive and produce less yield. Maybe as part of a $1000 Enthusiast Edition with no availability.

>>105817672 (OP)
Who cares

>>105817727
>SNAP BACK TO REALITY

>>105820037
You should really try Proxmox. Bare metal sucks.

>>105820143
There are epyc based ryzens and laptop based ryzens. The server chips have bad idle power use, the laptop chips just suck.
t. 2400g and 5500 victim

>>105820819
i've thought about it but just defaulted to bare metal out of laziness. maybe once something on the server fails i'll get around to it

>>105820537
to be fair the monolithic ones from Ryzen are quite slow

>>105820442
>the major degradation and instability issues became apparent on zen 2 onwards
uhhhhhh this literally never happened? schizoid maybe?
what are you rocking? a 14 gen intel? oh yeah there's no issues there buddy

>>105821989
Just look up 5950x degraded
It's more common than you otherwise would want. Not intel 14th gen bad but its a downgrade from when CPU where considered indestructible if kept below a certain voltage.

>>105820537
>see these laptop cpus idle lower
??

>>105822063
>Haha, just look it up bro!
Eat shit, faggot. Link some proper testing complete with methodology or stop wasting my time.

>>105822063
oh so you are that retard again, got it
>Just look up 5950x degraded
yeah a bunch of people out of millions of cpus sold suspect that their cpu might have been degraded, like with every other processor ever made
do you have some fucking data to prove that it's an actual problem or not? lemme guess, you don't.

>>105817813
street shit harder currynigger