>few years ago, generative AI and LLMs are first entering the public zeitgeist.
>countless opportunities and excitement arises in terms of video games
>imagine NPC's you can fully interact with, not just using predefined conversation paths
>imagine photorealistic, movie like graphics being generated on the fly where you cannot tell virtual and real life footage apart
>Imagine in-depth stories generated uniquely to you by AI game master like entities.
>fast forward to now
>everyone thinks AI is slop
>usage of AI is seen as cheap and lazy
>""artists"" are going crazy because machines are suddenly becoming just as capable, if not better at creating original content
>usage of LLMs is seen as some cardinal sin in the realm of creativity.
>generative AI companies are slandered from training their content on other works and "stealing" from artists - despite the fact every story, drawing, song is in some way inspired by previous works.

Is it fear of progress? inability to cope with the fact that your skills, once seen as somewhat valuable are not actually that special and can be replicated so easily by machines?
While not an artist I am a software engineer. I am fully aware currently AI code is slop, like how an artist might regard ai generated imagery to be shit. But I also understand it's progressing at an accelerating rate. Will I be out of a job in a few years? Will AI generate better code than I ever could? Maybe. Am I going to blame humanity for this? No because I am not a retard.

LLMs hallucinate random shit and generate images with 8 fingers - but in a not so far future, they won't.

Imagine the possibilities they are withholding from you because they cannot cope with the fact they are not as special as they thought.

The only AI I care about is picrelated.

>>105818189 (OP)
you already made this thread

>>105818189 (OP)
>LLMs hallucinate random shit and generate images with 8 fingers
This is already decidedly not a problem anymore.

To address the larger point: Yes, we're going through a phase of rejection, but there's no doubt AI is here to stay. It's clearly still in the early stages of people finding out what they can do with it, but it's a matter of time before we get the stuff you talked about (apart from the graphics thing because that's just weird, I don't think that's going to be the best use of it but regardless) because it's stuff the current models already have the fundamental capability to do so. Just a matter of leveraging it in the right way to put it into a game form.

I for one, have never wavered and I'm really looking forward to it. I can't wait to get truly emergent narratives and fully fleshed out and unique game worlds and campaigns.

>>105818192
Jeets are paid to shill. Been like that for a while. 4chan is just an advertisement board pretty much

>>105818189 (OP)
>dude just imagine the le possibilities and buy in
I don't believe in anything until I see the execution and all everything so far on the AI end has been nothingburgers, smoke and mirrors designed to create hype instead of anything actually functional

>>105818195
I'm convinced anyone who has only even briefly interacted with modern AI models and says shit like this are in hard cope mode. If you can't see the future it's not even a lack of vision, you are actively trying to deny it and I'm not even entirely sure why. I guess it's mostly just the current zeitgeist on the internet and people just mob onto the popular stance at the moment which is just to hate anything to do with AI? I don't see any other reason, especially coming from corners of the internet such as these which as historically been about weirdos forming artificial bonds with all kinds of non-human stuff...

>>105818196
You're right that I don't work directly with any sort of AI models in my line of work but do you have any sort of examples of AI-generated media that are particularly impressive? Generally my exposure to it is hallucinogenic video clips or uninteresting text adventures. It's not even really at the level of Hollywood slop.

>why are gamers so opposed to technology that will exclusively be used to make videogames worse?
>dont you know in just 2 more weeks it will finally be a magic cure all ambrosia?!

Ever since AI

became a thing I

have completely stopped ignoring

posts that are

formatted like this

because all bots space like

this for some reason

>>105818197
I don't even think you need a specific example to see it. Take literally any of the random slop shit you have ever seen and that should already trigger the lights up top. Even the sloppiest AI shit already exceeds the rendering capabilities of 99.9% of humans, and they have gotten so much better already in just over a year. The days when AI shit came out looking all fucked up with 6 fingers and shit already seem like so far in the past and it was just like a year and a half ago or something. Even video now is getting extremely close to not being noticeably not real. And all this shit is being generated in minutes by literally one guy. How can anyone not see the writing on the wall of just how big of a force multiplier this shit is?

If people have reservations about the larger direction of society and whatnot I get it, and I also understand people being put off by the examples we've gotten so far for the most part because they've mostly been hack jobs trying to get a quick buck, but as a tool, AI is undeniably an extremely powerful tool that opens up a ton of new possibilities for, in this case, video game design.

AI is the chaos theory proven true, the fuckers who made it never wondered the consequences of their work and we're paying the price of their negligence. Also OP is an idiot, as if that procedural thing was a good idea when it sounds like some Derek Smart bullshit

>>105818201
>we're paying the price of their negligence
what exactly is this price you're talking about?

>>105818200
>Even the sloppiest AI shit already exceeds the rendering capabilities of 99.9% of humans
pwetty kolorz™

>>105818189 (OP)
>imagine NPC's you can fully interact with, not just using predefined conversation paths
Dude, be honest, the only thing you want is to fuck an NPC or maximum - makes fun on it with stupid questions on stream.

>>105818200
>ask for examples
>get no examples
>but the POSSIBILITIES though
You are not beating the snake oil merchant allegations my friend.

>>105818203
>>105818205
Literally first result of image search under "AI generated image".
Speaking from purely a technical rendering perspective, what percentage of humans do you think could produce a picture of similar quality? And of the ones that could, how many could do it in 30 seconds. Forget 30 seconds, how many could do it in 2 days, even?
If you can't see how much time and effort AI can save developers and artists in generating concepts and working models if nothing else you are beyond arguing with.

>>105818206
>guys look at this garbage image I just genned
>no its not ugly as sin just walk a mile away from the monitor and it looks good

>>105818207
Lmao this, the moment you even start paying attention the uglier it gets

>>105818207
Hey man if you insist on missing the point and want to stay coping, by all means.

>>105818200
>>105818200
>Steal the art of the .1% of humans
>"See its better rendering than 99.9% of people"
no shit.
The thing your pea brain can't seem to understand is, there is more to visual human communication than "rendering capabilities". That is why machine learning slop will never have soul, its fundamentally impossible for an algorithm to communicate from a human perspective.
And that plays out in every machine learning art image you see, the soulless-ness emanates from it.
I can see its uses from a corporate and capitalist perspective though, where they don't care about art or quality.

>>105818206
no i'm still confused, why does AI make everything look so oily

>>105818206
There's nothing about a single generated image that would make me "imagine NPCs you can fully interact with, photo realistic movie like graphics being generated on the fly, in-depth stories generated uniquely to you".
It's just an ugly fucking image.

>>105818209
the point retarded nigger is AI will do nothing to provide quality products for customers (me). You retards go on and on about saving time and money and then post fucking garbage. You quite literally can't comprehend that people dont want this shit because it will result in videogames being WORSE.

>>105818206
>If you can't see how much time and effort AI can save developers and artists in generating concepts and working models if nothing else you are beyond arguing with.
I have never heard of a single game that has been delayed because of its art

>>105818213
Shut up you fucking luddite tranny! I'll make my dream game and i will shut up all those tranny devs that called me a chud on X! Fuck you fuck you fuck youfuck you fuck you fuck you!

>>105818210
aww yeah the new backpedal is here

Wait, isn't all AI art technically public domain now? What's stopping someone from taking ai generated assets and using them in other things?

>>105818210
>muh soul
You are literally sub 100 IQ

>>105818211
I know you don't care for an actual answer but you can just as easily find non-glossy (or non "oily" as you call it) pictures.

>>105818212
>brings up visual media
>here are some exaples of AI gen visual media
>yes but how does this give me dynamic narratives in videogames lmao

>>105818213
You're a moron. That's like arguing the advent of digital painting made everything worse, you absolute fucking neanderthal.

>>105818213
>You quite literally can't comprehend that people dont want this shit because it will result in videogames being WORSE
i dont like it either but i see this shit being the future. gaming is already going downhill and people are already satisfied with low quality content

>>105818218
>That's like arguing the advent of digital painting made everything worse
some people did. its pure jealousy/spite.
>i had to make do without that
boomer behavior.

>>105818218
You posted a still 1200x1200 image that by your own admission takes thirty seconds to render. That's extremely at odds with procedurally generated image generation and has nothing whatsoever to do with LLM text tools crafting compelling narratives.

>>105818218
>That's like arguing the advent of digital painting made everything worse
A digital artist has total control over his tools and skills to make something very specific, this is just gambling. Denying art, a very white craft, says everything i need to know.

>>105818189 (OP)
Why is the future stagnating?

>>105818192
It’s a bot and/or Indian. Ai “hype” is entirely astroturfed by them, and co-opted by retarded coomers. Pathetic to say the least

>>105818220
I know that's why I used it as an example because in the art world it's a damn near 1-to-1 repeat. Nowadays there's virtually no one who doesn't use exclusively digital tools because it's orders of magnitude faster to get stuff done. But most of these mouthbreaders wouldn't even know that because these are just dumbasses just saying whatever shit they see whoever popular people they follow repeat.

>>105818218
>You're a moron. That's like arguing the advent of digital painting made everything worse, you absolute fucking neanderthal.
just 2 more weeks bro just 2 more weeks and AI will finally be literal fucking magic that can do anything and you will make everyone look like fools by AI genning your videogame masterpiece right?

>>105818225
The broken english makes this better

>>105818217
No. Only the raw output is not protected.
If someone generates a girl in a bikini and uses photoshop to make a few adjustments then that gets protection. And AI being used in an industry setting is almost always going to be getting some adjustment
>sounds like bullshit hypothetical scenario that wouldn’t actually happe-
It happened
https://news.artnet.com/art-world/invoke-snags-first-ai-image-copyright-2608219

>>105818225
>mouthbreaders
You would think a guy touting the perks of AI would know how to use a fucking spellcheck.
I'm starting to think this whole thread is just bait, I'm going to go do something better with my Sunday

>>105818229
>I'm starting to think this whole thread is just bait, I'm going to go do something better with my Sunday
it is, he's made this thread like a dozen times over the past month lol

>>105818189 (OP)
it’s not progress it’s regression and you’re a fucking dupe

>>105818189 (OP)
The thing you AI faggots never mention is: payment. If devs actually are so retarded to put LLM NPCs into games, you are literally paying per interaction. No, you cant self host that shit, the average gamer potato can barely do 2k games. This is literally what is happening in the industry right now
Microsoft, Salesforce, Adobe, they are all moving away from Licenses. Instead you now get tokens/credits and pay per interaction. Since this is *very* lucrative, expect the same to happen to games. You will fucking look back fondly on game licenses.

>>105818222
Sometimes I wonder if these posts come from retards or people who are just in blindingly denial. Why would you assume that an artist has no control over the final output if they use AI tools? Do you think there's some sort of terms of service that once you generate an AI image you are legally forbidden to edit it or work on it for as long as you want? I seriously don't get it.

>>105818228
>Takes your AI pic
>Uses AI to slightly change it and say the prompt just made it look similar
>Now i can use it in my game
Should have prompted better

>>105818229
It is bait

>>105818193
>>LLMs hallucinate random shit and generate images with 8 fingers
>This is already decidedly not a problem anymore.
Liar
“hallucination” isn’t a glitch it’s built-in to how these retard machines function
it’s just when it produces output that looks correct enough to fool you into thinking it’s right, you’re like “wow”
and when it does the exact same process but the output is retarded gibberish “oh no!”
you’re all fucking morons

>>105818232
Finally, we're returning to the arcades.

>>105818193
>This is already decidedly not a problem anymore.
Why lie? All forms of AI make shit up, so you need to fact check it anyway, and at that point you might as well do the work yourself

You can play good AI generated RPGs and the potential is huge. Whats your actual point OP? Some people dont like AI? That's not stopping it.

>>105818227
>>105818229
ah yes, the old grammar error checkmate. The coper classic.

>>105818196
maybe...
you’re not as smart as you think you are;
and you’re being conned by incredibly stupid shit that everyone else can see right through because it’s retarded as hell?

>>105818233
Can you fix AI art? I'm not talking in general, i'm asking (You) specifically

>>105818236
>it’s just when it produces output that looks correct enough to fool you into thinking it’s right, you’re like “wow”
AIfags are retarded brownoids bro. Theyre so amazed by this tech because the literal deviant art tier garbage it produces is enough to fool them. Meanwhile anyone with a brain looks at it and instantly recognizes its garbage, which confuses the fuck out of the retards shilling it

>>105818209
the point is you’re a fucking dumbass with no soul or standards

>>105818237
Arcade is: you pay a quarter get one life.
Tokens are: You pay 100 bucks for 1.000 tokens. These tokens are used for all interactions, but you don't know how much each interaction is going to cost. You literally do your operation and if you did too much you end up in token debt. It is literally gacha gem obfuscation without even seeing the price tag.

You can not comprehend how dystopian this payment model is and big tech is pushing it so aggressively with that LLM nonsense.

>>105818242
Yes, I'm currently doing exactly that on my current side project.

I dunno if current AI technology is really the future but I'm sure having a lot of fun generating huge anime tiddies and going on erotic text adventures.

>>105818242
chances are i can fix your art too.

>>105818243
I just don't the undertstand the "it's faster bro" angle, do these guys know even the most basic things about game development? Do they think that the guys making the code are the same ones making the 2d art/UI stuff? Do they know that these branches are defined and separated at the beginning of development?

>>105818236
>>105818238
I pretty confident you can't even explain what your posts actually mean.

>>105818246
Fix this one >>105818206

>appeal of AI is that its cheap and quick
>its only cheap because the power cost is offloaded to retarded financial institutions
>its only quick because those same financial institutions also bought up all the GPUs to run them
this shit reeks of a bubble. The second the bill starts coming down to the consumer/company this shit will not be worth the cost

AI is good, it allows me to create as much furry smut as I want, AND I don't have to pay an overpriced artist a dime.

>>105818249
You know what, let me put the question then back to you. If time isn't really an issue for the art departments, then how come literally nobody is working with traditional tools in favor of digital?

>>105818189 (OP)
the core idea is just stupid
>lets just make a robot that replaces a bunch of people's jobs
for what? so we can create more jobless people?
it's not even a machine that replaces dangerous jobs or super important jobs that need more manpower to save lives
its a piece of shit technology that shouldnt exist

>>105818250
I pretty confident you're a retarded nigger.

>>105818250
>I don’t understand the magic idiot box so surely no-one else does either!

>>105818251
How much are you willing to pay me for it?

>>105818257
I don't believe you could explain that either, but that wasn't even what I was referring to.

>>105818258
A janny's salary, c'mon bro it's so easy, you said it yourself, don't tell me you're like one of those uppity patreon trannies

>>105818254
Nta, but wouldn't that be because everyone is used to digital tools?

>>105818260
Aren't you the one defending the patreon trannies itt?

>>105818189 (OP)
>generative AI companies are slandered from training their content on other works and "stealing" from artists - despite the fact every story, drawing, song is in some way inspired by previous works.
false equivalency by techbro retards who read hackernews

>>105818189 (OP)
>imagine NPC's you can fully interact with, not just using predefined conversation paths
>imagine photorealistic, movie like graphics being generated on the fly where you cannot tell virtual and real life footage apart
>Imagine in-depth stories generated uniquely to you by AI game master like entities.
Yeah, imagine all that because current batch can't deliver than no matter how much of AI coolaid you're slurping through all of your orifices.
And if you read deeper you know that current approach to AI already hit hard to cross limits.
>>105818193
>This is already decidedly not a problem anymore.
Why would you lie like that when news are full of shit like ''lawyers fined by judge because ChatGPT made up cases''.
You can even find talk straight from the horses' mouths that hallucinations aren't a bug to be squished but an inherent trait of the current batch of AIs.
No amount of guardrails or result tweaking will fix that.
Your unfounded faith in AI is irrelevant.

>>105818262
This is literally the first time i even mentioned patreon, also, stop dodging the question

Stellar blade schizo to the resque

>>105818261
Just think about that for a minute. Why would that be the case if art schools have been teaching with traditional tools for centuries and many (I've been out of it for over a decade but I think most) still largely do?

>>105818265
what question?

>>105818267
Idk, industry standards, the same way they say shit like Maya is, even when programs like Blender do 90% of the same shit

Is OP a gullible zoomer or a shill?

>>105818264
I'm only talking about the "8 fingers" shit. That's just really not a problem anymore. I generate images all the time and while there are still errors with some amount of frequency, hands are mostly devoid of the slop they used to be afflicted by. I suppose if you try to push models to generate complicated hand positions you might get some fucked up shit, I honestly wouldn't know because I don't really ask for shit like that, but the general hands issue AI images had with hands is pretty much gone.

bump

>>105818266
>>714679515
beautiful couple, so happy together

>>105818200
>Even the sloppiest AI shit already exceeds the rendering capabilities of 99.9% of humans
And I would still rather look at MS paint scribbles from drawthreads.
>And all this shit is being generated in minutes by literally one guy
If it takes a single guy minutes to generate something half "decent", how much do you think it takes mouth breathers to generate slop that is flooding the internet at this very moment? This quantity talk is most likely about the people who never gave a shit about things they are creating, they are just looking for a quick buck.
>but as a tool, AI is undeniably an extremely powerful tool that opens up a ton of new possibilities for, in this case, video game design
Those already good enough for the job never needed it to begin with. AI is for those who can't be asked to learn about the field they want to make money off of. Competent map creator learned what works and what doesn't from playing games and year of experience where he made some blunders and learned what works and what doesn't and MOST IMPORTANTLY, understands why it works or doesn't work.
So AI will be used for making asset flips without the bare minimum effort and time needed to make an asset flip and corporate boards to cut on "unimportant" parts of development.

I'm not investing in your company, retardo.

AI will replace everyone, except the main character

>>105818269
1. you can digitize your work and put in proper formats for media after you complete it (there are still some artists (mostly old school or really high end guys) that do this.

2. Even for artists not directly tied to collaborative media that just work as freelancers for all kinds of stuff the overwhelming majority use digital either exclusively or for most work they do.

Unless you mean that it's because of "industry standards" in the sense that the market now expects a level of expediency that digital can provide so artists may feel pressure to adopt to keep up with expectations then maybe there's some truth to that, but there's nothing stopping anyone from using traditional if they really want to.

>>105818253
THIS, sometimes AI can be a blessing

>>105818247
Same. I just use it for coomer text adventures. I really don’t see any good use for AI in terms of other digital entertainment and practical uses. But, corpos do which means my fellow cattle- I mean fellow human bean will soon understand the importance of AI

>>105818189 (OP)
>>fast forward to now
>>everyone thinks AI is slop
>>usage of AI is seen as cheap and lazy
I wonder why that happened? Maybe it's because in those intervening years, all the flowery fantasies you just described have not come anywhere close to seeming possible.
>imagine NPC's you can fully interact with, not just using predefined conversation paths
LLMs definitionally cannot do this shit. They don't so much "forget" reality as they lack a concept of reality in the first place, there is no component of them that simulates a reality, that is not what they're built to do. There will be nothing resembling intelligence in this technology until someone goes completely back to the drawing board, which won't happen for a long while because too much money has been burned on this dead end.
It should be a quaint tool for autocompleting lines of code and looking up foreign language idioms, that is the maximum extent of its contribution to human worth.

"Bro just give it a few more years bro" is not an argument. People hate AI slop because THEY HAVE EYES. They can see it being used as a pathetic cost-cutting measure to drown the world in even more hideous advertisements, quite literally taking all the sense and taste out of design and authorship in favour of uncanny, schizophrenic fakeness.
They can see the dumbest mouthbreathers in their vicinity drive themselves to suicide talking to chatbots that just randomly riff on whatever was said last, convincing themselves there's a person in there then hitting new depths of mental illness when the illusion predictably implodes.
They can feel their eyes glaze over every time they start reading something online and spot the obvious tell that it was generated in 5 seconds with an algorithm instead of having any actual effort put into it.
They can watch the world being made worse and worse and worse by every messianic manchild involved in this bubble of an industry, and decide that this is not a positive trajectory.

>>105818280
its just NFTs all over again. Anyone with a brain avoids it, anyone wanting a quick buck shills it, and anyone retarded eats it up

>>105818274
If you refuse to use anything that has made it easier for dumb people to do dumb shit then you should probably log off and kill yourself. With your bare hands of course because even ropes have done the same.

I was addicted to AI Dungeon back when we all sat here and posted screen caps nonstop and now that AI is actually really usable at making a decent story on rails I spend more time gooning or playing epic isekai adventures with bots on Chub AI than any videogames.

I am eagerly awaiting the day we get the context and proper framework for an AI that can actually run a proper RPG and keep numbers and stats in line for a long-running "game".

>>105818259
>>105818250
LLMs and generative image models are both transformers, they function by taking a large amount of input data, breaking it down into tiny pieces, and then recompiling those pieces into output that statistically resembles the target input.
There’s not something wrong when they hallucinate, they’re functioning exactly as designed.
And they are not getting better, from last month:
> Recently, though, that trend seems to have reversed. Media coverage and industry benchmarks both confirm that recent models, including the flagship models from OpenAI (GPT-o3) and China’s DeepSeek (DeepSeek-R1) are prone to much more hallucination than their predecessors

>>105818284
Yes. I too can read a short definition on wikipedia (or ask GPT for one lol). But what does that actually mean? How does the model actually work? Surely you can explain that to me?

>>105818189 (OP)
>everyone thinks AI is slop
>usage of AI is seen as cheap and lazy
in reality, everyone is starting to find uses for it and theres less outrage online than theres ever been.

You can describe a dish to the finest detail, but unless you're the one working in the kitchen, you didn't make a damn thing. Nobody is impressed or inspired by AI shit except for indians and gullible facebook seniors, which is why no one likes it. Turns out, the human mind and skill behind something is what gives it value in anything creative or original. We've finally solved the question of what makes art, art, so at least AI can be thanked for that.

>>105818287
>Turns out, the human mind and skill behind something is what gives it value in anything creative or original.
That could not possibly be more incorrect.

>sirs pls buy the AI very smart

>>105818287
i love seeing you freaks panic when my art gets replies.

>>105818309
Can we see some of the art and some of the replies

>>105818189 (OP)
>>714673471
>>everyone thinks AI is slop
>>usage of AI is seen as cheap and lazy
It is, and, it is.

All your use of AI tells me is that you do not care about your product enough to invest time or money into it. If you've got an AI 'art' ad, you do not believe your product is strong enough to recoup the cost of having someone actually produce an ad for you. If you don't think it's a good product, and you don't want to invest in it, why should I?

>>105818321
1 example.
> hurr it's clearly AI slop
cope, looks indistinguishable from human generated content

>>105818382
Did you do this, or did you comission a machine to do it for you?

Why do you keep making this thread? Faggot

>>105818199
This is how Deepseek writes so yeah it gets pretty obvious

>>105818309
>Twitter
Yikes sweaty

>>105818409
why do you ask?

>>105818382
Clearly AI slop, and it a person drew that it would be slop too

>>105818422
Who created the image you posted?

>>105818321
sure, if you lurk. lol.

>>105818438
>AI generated
>who created this?
???

>>105818424
oh, so now people can make slop too?

>>105818206
You're right anon and anyone pushing back is either trolling or lacks the cognitive ability to see the eventual endpoints of this tech.

the goyim be sloppin

>>105818450
No just show it here, I'm really interested what people think of it. Bet you are really proud of people's reactions to your art, it always feels good to read about the things your art evokes in other people.

>>105818409
Well, now we all know how AI hurt you.

>>105818519
No I just want to know who made the pic

>>105818222
>this is just gambling
and you just exposed yourself for not knowing what you are talking about. You assume all AI art is text to image generation. Have you seen really complex comfyui nodes before? Do you avoid using calculators because it ruins the craft of doing all math by hand? Do you think artists never trace or imitate the work of others because its "a white craft"? A real digital artist is already using AI in their workflow somewhere and you dont even notice it. A bad artist is producing the slop that is easily recognizable.

>>105818525
bro it's AI, what do you mean "who"?

>>105818190

>>105818608

>>105819214

>>105819239

>>105819256

>>105819262

>>105819268

>>105818189 (OP)
It's the fact that none of it was really cool, it's all literally just reddit

>>105818193
>is already decidedly not a problem anymore
Nope. They're much better at it but even imagen and Veo make fucked up hands or disembodied parts every now and then. We've just gotten better with workflows that patch these issues.

>>105818189 (OP)
>LLMs hallucinate random shit and generate images with 8 fingers - but in a not so far future, they won't.
Wow anon, that's fantastic! Maybe in this wonderful future of yours, we can all start talking positively about "AI", until then nobody cares. AI isn't just bad in its current state, it's actively being used to shittify everything and everybody is tired of seeing it.

>>105818200
Breh I hate AI slop but this is true. Most people are fucking retards that will watch "pokemon IRL" and "cutting glass fruit" slop on tik tok literally all day. I worry that AI will disincentivize artists that are truly talented and have complex feelings they want to communicate with their art, but let's get real. Most people don't care about good art and most artists are cranking out complete garbage. Things will continue to get ugly and cheap until there's nothing left to cheapen.

>>105818206
You're asking the question "who can make this" but you should be asking "why SHOULD anyone make this." If you can't look at that picture and understand why AI is bad you are a complete and utter pedestrian. I would call you a pleb but not even a roman pleb would think that looks "good."

>>105818189 (OP)
AI is amazing, but retards ruin the culture around it by
>overhyping it like it's the machine revolution, saying cringe stuff about an "AI singularity"
>promoting as le business revolution you need to use it while you work while they sleep or something

>>105818452
Never said they couldn't, retard

>>105818382
Ai, or digital man made: slop , soulless, cliche, and boring.

>>105818189 (OP)
>Is it fear of progress?
based on how you wored your thread, you would not accept any other explanation anyway.
Your entire family deserves to be burned alive by the way.

>>105818189 (OP)
>Imagine the possibilities they are withholding from you because they cannot cope with the fact they are not as special as they thought.

who?
nobody cares how big tech outcucks you, faggot.

>>105818245
You can set max tokens in your API call and it will fit the response into that limit. But yeah hiding this from the user in the chat interface is slimy.

>>105818191
finetuned llama 3, wow so advanced

>>105818206
the problem is that it refuses to change its artstyle even if you tell it to. you can distinguish something generated by chatgpt and stable diffusion very easily so it gets boring

>>105818206
wtf is this? looks like some kind of android just cum on whatever this thing is

>>105819617
>>105819626
So maybe the problem isn't AI vs human, it's talented people vs untalented people, regardless of whether they use AI or not. Ever consider that?

>>105819951
what talent do you need to use AI? write a dumb prompt and pick the less worse slop

>>105819762
Let me slightly change your post just so you can (hopefully) see how silly it is.

the problem with Seb Mckinnon is that he refuses to change his artstyle even if you tell him to. you can distinguish something generated by Seb and Yoshitaka Amano very easily so it gets boring

Do you see it?

>>105819974
Well, a talented person will for sure provide more accurate and useful prompts such that it yields better outputs from the AI, but I wasn't even talking about that. I'm just saying a talented person will have the thing the untalented person lacks which is the most important ingredient to create worthwhile things which is vision and taste. It's one thing to be able to request any possible thing to be generated, it's another to know what would be a worthwhile thing to request, and yet another to accurately judge the output and what needs to be changed in order to bring it closer to the desired end point. And yet another to be able to take it there (whether by retreating it manually or a further iteration with the AI or other)

>>105820057
prompt engineering is a meme. get a proper career.

>muh vision and taste.

thats what a person develops by making real art, not by picking generated slops.

>>105820117
Wrong. Vision and Taste are things you are born with.

>>105820157
nope, you can't tell if a guitarist have a real skill, if you never touched a guitar. Thats why people usually don't notice the 8 fingers, the uneven eyes, or proportion errors on AI images.

>>105820260
~But you don't need to know how to play guitar or even know what a guitar sounds like to know if what the person is playing is good music. You're confusing the technique with the artistry. You missing the forest for the trees. The best composer in the world is not the best player of any instrument, even the ones he writes for. Conversely the best piano player in the world is not the best musician. Playing the instrument and writing great music are completely different talents. I would argue the really precious resource there is the person who is talented at coming up with the best melodies, not the person who can play them flawlessly.

>>105820342
>Playing the instrument and writing great music are completely different talents.

Composers do play music. This conversation is silly, get a skill, google won't solve all your problems in life.

>>105820342
You are literally describing plebian taste and you don't have the self-awareness to realize you're doing it.

>>105818191
neuroSoCute

>>105820462
When did I say they didn't? Did you even read my post?

>>105820471
nice argument. Is anything I said wrong?

>>105818189 (OP)
>imagine NPC's you can fully interact with, not just using predefined conversation paths
>imagine photorealistic, movie like graphics being generated on the fly where you cannot tell virtual and real life footage apart
>Imagine in-depth stories generated uniquely to you by AI game master like entities.
Sounds great. By all means, please attempt this. I've seen a handful of neat experiments/mods involving use of LLMs for dialogue.

But in general, that's not what we got. We got normal games with normal static assets, but those assets are now AI generated instead of being fully hand authored.
All the soullessness and slop of AI with none of the upsides.

>>105820891
AI in the state we currently know it has been a thing for barely 2 years and it's a constantly moving target. If you're tricked into playing a game "made with AI" and expect it to be good that's on you. We're lucky if we get the first fully functional proof-of-concept-type of game in the next 2 years. It's obviously gonna take time.

>>105818189 (OP)
>SAAAAAAAAAAAR WHY DO PEOPLE SEE SLOP AS SLOP?????
Kill yourself, retarded jeet

>>105818189 (OP)
Automating entire university departments that have existed for hundreds of years didn't spark protests/burning down cities.

>>105819974
while op is fucking retarded and should absolutely kill himself without any hesitation, there is some truth to it he can't convey, because he has no capacity to even picture something like this.
imagine a progremmur who has some talent of drawing he never bothered to develop, it was some funny pics in school and that's it, he cant actually draw well, he will mess up proportions and perspective every single time. all he has is potential.
now he asks ai to build poses for him, sketches he can use as a reference
suddenly he is not absolutely terrible anymore

okay well, the pic is what gemini thinks a sketch is

>namefag is absolutely clueless
classic innit

>>105822103
faggot rape unit 15000 cant come soon enough. the robot will recognize you by body language. before unleashing it, i will wait for turbo ultra m3 model
stupid fucking nigger, kys

>>105818206
This looks like shit. You need to provide a better example that isn't a portrait image.