Why is hacking considered a crime if no one gets hurt?

>>105822106 (OP)
who cares. you will never be a hacker.

Why is theft considered a crime if no one gets hurt
Why is vandalism considered a crime if no one gets hurt

>>105822106 (OP)
Because it hurts Jews wallets

>>105822106 (OP)
hacking is not a crime. doing something illegal is.
hacking is a state of mind, it means you enjoy re-purposing things. you change the function of something which was designed for a purpose, to another purpose. that's what hacking means. the term has been hijacked and now associated with illegal shit

>>105823144
>hacking is a state of mind, it means you enjoy re-purposing things. you change the function of something which was designed for a purpose, to another purpose. that's what hacking means
There's a simpler term for this. It is called a "sense of power" and normies despise this

>>105822106 (OP)
Once a hacker overclocked my power supply causing a fire which almost burned my house down

>>105822106 (OP)
>

Why is crime considered a crime if no one gets hurt?

>>105823212
I just saw a hacker fly over my house and kill ten people

I want to know why it's a crime to hack computers in hostile nations (to the USA) such as russia, china, NK, Iran etc from within America? I'm assuming glowie hacker teams want a monopoly on the fun. This shit should be like the way pirates got a "letter of marque" to do pirate shit legally.

>>105823212
My grandpa died when a hacker made his pacemaker go nuts

>>105822106 (OP)
Is technical hacking still a thing? Nowadays you mostly see social engineering shit.

>>105823212
a hacker hacked the plan I was in and it got destroyed. nobody survived

>>105822288
>Why is theft considered a crime if no one gets hurt
>Why is vandalism considered a crime if no one gets hurt
On the west coast it's practically not a crime anymore even though legally it is
Most larger municipalities treat it the same as drug crime and will not dispatch police unless if someone is in danger.

In my municipality for example, if something gets stolen or if a bum lights up a crack pipe in the middle of the crosswalk the police will not respond if anyone reports the crime because the city has instructed them only to respond to violent crimes.

It's interesting, actually. Even though these things are illegal, a local PD can actually arrest someone for breaking one of these laws, such as smoking fentanyl or petty theft, but the DA has been instructed not to prosecute these crimes, leading to the individual getting released the next day

99.999999% of hacking attempts don't get prosecuted in the real world

>>105823839
you are dumb. Your intellectual abilities is less than average.

>>105822106 (OP)
>Why is hacking considered a crime
how are crimes decided?

I'll give you an example. In ancient china, they reserved death of thousand cuts for people who:
-Committed Treason
-Heinous murder
-Attacked their employer

>>105824017
>You) #
>you are dumb. Your intellectual abilities is less than average
>is
"are"
Oh, the irony of your post

>>105823839
>On the west coast it's practically not a crime anymore even though legally it is
Ok and? Everywhere else it is a crime so what's your point? Retard

>>105823717
Its a gentleman's agreement for this. Run hydra against open RDP ports in Russia all you want nobody cares. Ukraine released a desktop app for contributing bandwidth to ddosing Russia. However if you do something impressive enough that will get the attention of glowies they wont arrest you but they will threaten and harass you into hacking for them

>>105824483
>they wont arrest you but they will threaten and harass you into hacking for them
Do they pay you and give you a pension?

>>105822106 (OP)
'Hacking' is not exactly what you think it is.

>>105823750
Yes, although things like buffer overflows are less common than they were in the 90’s and are harder to exploit due to the presence of memory protections. Plenty of people and companies still release shitty code that can be exploited and used in 0-day attacks, just look at the CVE list.

>>105824483
You are making a grave mistake. Just becauae a rogue state is at war with other states does not mean those other states turn into rogue states themselves.
Russia doesn't care because if it hurts the west it's a good thing at the end of the day. Also sour grapes: Even if russia wanted it's probably too disorganised to really fight cybercrime within. They avoid two problems by merely directing it.
Your state fights criminal behaviour as a matter of principle. Your state has ridgid rules and no leeway in their application. In the eyes of your state the damage done to russia weights much less than a criminal in its own population being created. Your state does not want people making the experience of getting awax with crime,your state does not want people learning criminal techniques.
Russia will not persecute their criminals if they spare russia and russians. Your western country will seek to get you for being a criminal, regardless who and where the victim is.

>>105824887
>Your state fights criminal behaviour as a matter of principle.
Amerikkka fights crime to profit from it. If criminals paid their taxes then the state would leave them alone.

>>105822106 (OP)
Only your Yiddish masters are allowed to manipulate the "money" numbers.