Thread 105839282

>he doesn't use Nano.
ngmi

>>105839282 (OP)
I don't use gnushit, period.
The death of this ecosystem will be a good thing(tm).

>>105839308
So true, sister!

>>105839282 (OP)
I even use it on Windows it is so good.
>>105839308
>this ecosystem
>hurr old thing bad because reasons

>105839356
I don't respond to strawman arguments by incompetent gnushillers. Have a great day!

it just werks

hurr @105839397
Because you can't hang. I hope you live a long time!!1

>>105839282 (OP)
Why? Emacs already exists.

>>105839282 (OP)
Nano is for fags, chads use vim

>>105839282 (OP)
i like nano, its my go to for whatever edits tho for longer sessions i think i want a better tool. nano has its role as the first thing you use to view something and then jumping into whatever else for deeper work

>>105839282 (OP)
GNU/Based nanochad

>>105839282 (OP)
But that's an eta, not a nu

>>105842254
I originally learned VI back in the days of Sun OS but Nano is a lot more user friendly for new users than VIM is

How do you cut and paste on nano.. it probably tells you at the bottom of the screen but I've never looked lol

>>105845700
It might be different on GNU+Linux, but the shortcut for the help buffer is on the bottom unless you hid it using the config or commandline argument.
Ctrl + G to show the help buffer.
There are even versions or configs/patches where you can use Ctrl+C & Ctrl+V & Ctrl+X, even the mouse.

>>105845691
>Nano is a lot more user friendly
>look inside
>tfw had to google how to exit vim
>tfw had to google how to select multiple lines or to delete whole line in nano

>>105845783
>had to google how to exit vim
>it tells you how to exit when you start it up
https://i.4cdn.org/g/1751920497454164.png
I don't think the issue is the software, anon.

>>105845831
Maybe you opened Vi instead. That is a terrible experience if you aren't ready for it. There is nothing wrong with preferring mouse/featherpad.

>>105845740
Ty

>>105845698
yep it just works

>>105845740
alias nano='nano --modernbindings'

>>105850103
Very nice. This works on Windows as well. I prefer original bindings, but it is nice to see it works so well.

>>105839308
filtered

>>105839282 (OP)
It's OK for quick container edits, but unironically harder to use than Vim nowadays. Cause it sits on this obnoxious middle ground, uncanny valley of the standard CUE keybinds, and ^X doesn't actually cut text, nor ^V actually pastes it. So it's way too similar to other text editors except for the last 10% deal breaker bits. Vim's motions (the basic ones at least) are so completely different to anything else that they get burned in your brain once yout commit to it.

I would use nano if the syntax highlighting wasn't dog shit.

Anyone here uses mcedit as their main editor? Altough I've used NC in the DOS days it seems pretty bad compared to nano, but some of my friends swear by it.

Based

>>105839308
false

>>105839282 (OP)
I use micro, because nano shortcuts are retarded.

>>105855595
>golangshit
nano won

>>105855784
>language autism
As if you actually edit anything in a terminal.

>>105855860
Sure. Enjoy compiling micro with your jewgle backdoored (full of telemetry) golang compiler.

Notepad2

>>105856409
?