>b-but its bloat!

Yea but it works great for running stuff in a sandbox and its universal

AppImage is better.

>gives you a just werks game launcher in flatpak with zero chance of malware

Honestly most windows malware doesn't even run on Linux and even if there's Linux malware/miner specifically designed for Linux good luck getting out of the sandbox.

>>105842829
*backdoors your system*
it was nothin' personnel

>installs 50 billions shits into your system
>requires internet connection to do anything
gay

>>105842972
But enough about package managers

>>105842972
>requires internet connection to do anything
That would be snap

>>105842829
fpbp

>>105842811 (OP)
>sandbox
im not a red hat looney that perceives every piece of software as hostile

>yay -S heroic-games-launcher
wow that sure was hard. maybe you should go play on windows or mac if you wanna be a faggot. linux is for troons and real leet hacker niggas like me

>>105842972
you can stop using ubuntu, maybe?

>>105842811 (OP)
I'll stick to .exe thanks.

>>105842811 (OP)
>want to download via apt repo, but can only find snap or flatpak of application

>>105845000
you should

>>105842829
fpbp
It has so much potential but it needs actual support by both desktop environments and app developers.

>>105842811 (OP)
only people with a 20y old ThinkPad spam bloat.

It's dead lmao

>>105842829
fpbp

>>105842845
trvke

>>105842811 (OP)
What is the use case of running FOSS in a sandbox?
Static linking solves the universal problem.

Is flatpak like Windows executables for Linux?

just compile it

>>105842845

>>105851951
no, that would be appimage

Flatpak is even worse than snap

>>105853594
Got it, sounds nice