u mad?

A bit, yeah, because smartphones shouldn't be made at all.

>>105863642 (OP)
mad about what? wasn't your argument that apple is exclusive and for rich only?

>>105863642 (OP)
my stocks are now worth more
my cushy job is even safer
what would I be mad for?

>>105863642 (OP)
This looks like a quarterly graph with spline interpolation. Whichever innumerate moron who made it should be shot.

What I'm really seeing here is that people aren't buying phones anymore and that's what you should be concerned about
Look at that shit, people bought twice as many phones 8 years ago as they did today

>>105864002
Phones are twice as expensive now so it evens out.

>>105863642 (OP)
Where are all the Chinese brands in this graph?

>>105864002
>that's what you should be concerned about
Why is that concerning?

>>105864178
Fewer sales means smaller potential profit, so less risk in making new phone therefore less innovation.

>>105864124
stop noticing things!
market is free! ok!

>>105863642 (OP)
more mad that shitsung is the other half

>visual capitalist

>>105864002
the plot only shows the US and its lackeys
China isn't included...

>>105866178
>i hecken love capitalism!
>you aren't a dirty commie right?

>>105864178
Line must go up.
>>105864278
All "innovation" on mobile platforms is adtech. Innovation is the last thing you want there to be more of.