Will the AI bubble bursting be worse than the dotcom dubble crash and the 2008 financial crisis?

>>105868658 (OP)
Much worse

>>105868658 (OP)
Very bad. Possibly the worst thing ever.
Financial niggas still will not be held accountable, while we the plebs get triple fisted.

>>105868658 (OP)
When did we get AI? All we have are emulative autonomous systems.
Yes it can do whatever you train it to do, but that's all it can do, nothing more than that.
>muh it talks
It's just a glorified mimic

>>105868658 (OP)
The dotcom bubble wasnt even that bad, only dumb money lost

AI is on a similar boat, only dumb money is likely to lose because there is some value to be gained with AI same as the internet after the dotcom bubble

>>105870071
>It's just a glorified mimic
That is enough to compete with human labor

>>105870219
ChatGPT, build me a house

>>105870256
Grok + Optimus will

>>105870265
2 more weeks

I think it'll make for cool assistants and that's about it. Elon is convinced his new grok models will truly invent something new in the next year but I am not convinced.

>>105868658 (OP)
I hope so

>>105870256
Don't need AI to build you a house when you've got tens of millions of people displaced by AI that are fighting for bottom of the barrel jobs.

>>105870334
I am not convinced Grok will invent something new but I can see an AlphaEvolve like AI invent something

>>105870388
Also there are automated 3d printed houses now

>>105870214
The issue at the dot.com bubble, which is a very similar situation with AI today. Is that the business model is a bit flunky..
Currently it seems the business model of AI companies is a subscription service?? in a competitive space? Not exactly a cash cow..
Maybe there is some money in specialising AI for a specific purpose e.g. Company pay to have a custom AI made to sell magazines over the phone.
But that does not seem super scalable, it would require labour per job.

>>105868658 (OP)
It'll be OK America still has strong export industries of aircraft and cars

>>105868658 (OP)
At this point I want it to crash and burn, big tech & surveillance are anti life

>>105870550
Current version of AI are just prototypes to build the later versions which will actually generate automated systems of profit

>>105870550
Their future business, and what will kill the AI bubble is AI agents. You pay per token with those and they absolutely siphon cash

>>105868658 (OP)
No. It will destroy the AI service companies. But everyone else is just contracting with them to offer some minor AI enhancement of an existing service or product. The issue in the dot com bubble was tons of new companies offering "thing" but on-the-internet! without any other business plan.

Wow it really seems like the cynicism of 4chan is off the charts with AI. Every board is utterly failing in critical thought. It’s confirmed for me that the users here are arrogant nihilists.

Ai can improve itself
Ai has far more compute power than a human brain, or several Indians
Ai can do all “knowledge jobs”
Humanoid robots already exist
Quantum computing and fusion power are already things with plenty of documentation
Modeling folding and identifying all proteins, this would take us thousands of years
Sensors/cameras already everyfuckingwhere feeding data to Ai
Your work is data, where you click, where and how you move your body, what you say when you speak.
Ai just simulated thousands of new crystals for possible uses in semiconductors and whatever else that shit is for
What the absolute fuck is wrong with you people?

We will enter new winter soon, millions of GPU left idle waiting for new architect or algorithm.

>>105871605
AI generated post

>>105868658 (OP)
There’s little commercial incentive to build a self-governing, self-modifying AI hive

well shit, thanks Gemini

>>105870256
>hur dur AI cant do physical labour
You realise millions of jobs are mainly just typing words into a computer. LLMs can and will replace this.

>>105871347
This. Chatgpt, grok, etc are just tech demo toys at the moment. It's an arms race for which API is going to be dominant as the basis for end solutions.
>>105871393
The token price is going to drop massively over the next few years.

>>105868658 (OP)
bubbles don't do shit anymore because money isn't real, the pandemic locked down the whole world and no one went broke. The Ai bubble is stuck in perpetual
>muh two more weeks until AGI
and so no one is going to lose faith in such a way to trigger a bubble

>>105872299
Most brain dead nigger award goes to you. I specifically included things an ai wouldn’t say to satisfy your retarded ass but you still failed.

>>105873854
Thanks grok

>>105868658 (OP)
It will be great because none of the technology will go away. It will just have fewer corporations meddling with it

>>105868658 (OP)
a crash will happen, but it won't have anything to do with AI and more with retarded trade and fiscal policies

>>105871605
>Ai can improve itself
To the contrary see "model collapse"
>Ai has far more compute power than a human brain, or several Indians
racism outside of /b/
>Ai can do all “knowledge jobs”
For about a day until it fucks of so monumentally that it results in a lawsuit
>Humanoid robots already exist
Without any software to make them useable for real world tasks. Computer vision and object permanence is below that of a chimp.
>Quantum computing and fusion power are already things with plenty of documentation
Wooo quantum quantum quantum quantum
>Modeling folding and identifying all proteins, this would take us thousands of years
That's one actually useful application because the problem is the perfect combination of repetitiveness and rigorous test-ability. Too bad many problems aren't like that.
>Sensors/cameras already everyfuckingwhere feeding data to Ai
The current paradigm of """AI""" would need more data that has been produced and could conceivably produced to make significant leaps at this point. We're deep into the law of diminishing returns at this point.
>Your work is data, where you click, where and how you move your body, what you say when you speak.
>Ai just simulated thousands of new crystals for possible uses in semiconductors and whatever else that shit is for
>What the absolute fuck is wrong with you people?
I'm bored.

>>105868658 (OP)
i don't care how many pajeets lose their jobs, as long as open weights are released

>>105870550
This is not what caused the dot com bubble. The market conditions that led to the dot com bubble do not exist today.

>>105874259
Okay, but consider this:
[spoiler]Two more weeks[/spoiler]