Thread 105868683 - /g/ [Archived: 416 hours ago]

Anonymous
7/11/2025, 1:13:58 PM No.105868683
fx-4100-36ghz-box-60e6289f062ed3dcbaea47c65cb12510
fx-4100-36ghz-box-60e6289f062ed3dcbaea47c65cb12510
md5: 49091fc8b93450c9ae83ea6f37e2687f🔍
You don't need more.
Anonymous
7/11/2025, 1:15:21 PM No.105868700
you need at least a PSU, motherboard and some RAM
Anonymous
7/11/2025, 1:32:04 PM No.105868824
Wire_Cat
Wire_Cat
md5: dd048b00d2d85f43e439153292c9eeea🔍
Which workloads were these bad in due to the gimped design where multiple cores shared an FPU (or whatever it was)?
Replies: >>105870797 >>105870923
Anonymous
7/11/2025, 3:42:09 PM No.105869873
if you want to use old shit stick to overclockable xeons, they can still mog some modern processors
FX cpus are worse than the previous gen's phenoms btw
Anonymous
7/11/2025, 5:26:03 PM No.105870797
>>105868824
>Which workloads were these bad in
My guess, single-threaded and desktop performance. With, potentially, the exception of a BSD OS running a certain flag.
Anonymous
7/11/2025, 5:40:44 PM No.105870923
>>105868824
Any workload that uses more than half the cores will suffer to a degree. They don't just share FPUs but instruction decoders. It's essentially hardware SMT