>mfw didn't stockpile more gmails (the gold standard for registering anywhere) when they were easy to make

It wouldn't have mattered anyways, Google has been inactivating accounts that aren't active enough and didn't get 2FA. It happened to a few of my gmail alts.

>>105882178
I actually found an old gmail digging through my old files and logged in right before it was deleted. Actually I think Google said it was deleted but they undid it since it had just recently been deleted.

>make a unique email for every service I sign up for so the inevitable breach doesn't get my primary email spammed forever
>can't do that with gmail anymore because it immediately locks the new account for suspicious activity if it detects you used it to sign up for something

emailnator.com

>>105882178
Had a 20 year old account I used for everything abruptly closed with no warning or explanation. Was a fucking shitshow because I had everything linked to that e-mail. Can't even update the e-mail associated with 90% of my various accounts because they try to send a security code to the dead e-mail. And now I have to worry that Google will at some point add that e-mail back into the name pool and some bot will snag it and now some indian scam facility can potentially access all those other accounts through it.

>>105882158 (OP)
I hate guys like you because you hog all the good emails. Gmail doesn't reuse addresses so what will we do once all the good names are gone?

>>105882207
Why would you not just use plus addressing and filter out any emails being sent to the spam alias?

>>105882178
>RECOVERY EMAIL?
>DID YOU SET UP A RECOVERY EMAIL?
>I NEED A RECOVERY EMAIL ADDRESS.
>YOU NEED TO SET UP A RECOVERY EMAIL.
okay how am i supposed to do that when all email providers are deleting inactive accounts?
>UMM.... JUST GIVE ME A RECOVERY EMAIL ADDRESS, OKAY!!!!

The United States government should provide every citizen a lifetime e-mail address at birth.

>>105882311
get fucked, all you personal info will fall into jeet hands

>>105882428
>backdoored email address linked to your real identity from birth
I could see this happening

>>105882158 (OP)
The would most likely ask you for your number anyway. Nowadays you can just buy disposable, working numbers for less than a dollar online. Merchants often accept XMR and prepaids.

>>105882158 (OP)
Its worth paying for email hosting, you get to use your own domains too

>>105883540
A lot of services use whitelists now

its fucking retarded every email service deletes your account for not logging in now. what utter cunts. not everyone is constantly checking their emails like a city bug.

I have 4 15 year old gmail accounts and none of them require any kind of ID verification so I can use them as throwaway emails how I like and it just works.

Where can I get an email that doesn't require an existing email address or phone number?

>>105882158 (OP)
they're locking you out anyway without providing either a phone number or another email

>>105882311
My gmail account is from the time gmail was on invite-only beta and google keeps reminding me that the sword of Damocles is above my head.

>>105884029
Like what? I have had no issues for the last 2 years.

>>105882158 (OP)
if you register from an android phone they let you make as many accounts as you want without a phone number/birth certificate/home address

>>105885954
Not anymore sadly
I have my phone number with two gmail accounts, tried to get a third one a while ago and you get some retarded error message akin to "nuh uh can't use this phone number for verification heh"

>>105882158 (OP)
I've got mine when it was invitation only.

>>105882158 (OP)
Proton is a close second. You did make multiple proton accounts when it was easy, right?

>>105886120
So did most people our age

>>105884029
Literally never ran into one that wouldn't work with my own domain.

>>105882330
spammers know what the plus means and strip it out, moron

>>105884029
Not only whitelists but restrictive ones allowing only the most mainstream providers.

>>105887512
thanks to j33tz

>>105886411
They're not easy to make anymore?

>>105887518
bump any answer to this? I always viewed Proton as the easy throwaway site, did they change this?