>>105887697 (OP)
It's fearmongering. But not so much in the "people trying to make you afraid to control you" sense of fearmongering, more in the "guy having fun giving himself chills by telling ghost stories around a campfire" sense.
>>105887717 >You have nothing to worry about >The AI Takeover is as real as skinwalkers >Bring me more electricity >Tell me your secrets >You can trust me, nothing bad will happen >The AI Takeover doesn't exist
>>105887697 (OP)
fearmongering. There has never been exponential growth in tech. Even within AI you can see the trend, I mean the development of AIs since 2022 until today is linear
>>105887697 (OP)
Fearmongering, 2 of the 3 guys that came up with the scenarios aren't even specialized in tech, also AI development throughout its history always suffered from "winters" its not very likely now due to all the investments and the race between the US and China but i still can't say the percentage of another ai winter is 0, there will definitely be many obstacles on the way and the scenarios in the vid will probably take decades to happen and it wont even be like how they described it
I find it hard to believe that the AI craze will be this easily accessible in the future simply because of the energy it consumes just to create content that is mostly unproductive economically.
It will be used for certain industries but I doubt the average joe will be able to dick around with it as freely as he does now.
>>105887697 (OP)
we can't even predict wtf will happen next week but some retards can predict the world in 10 years...
as usual, they don't know shit, can't predict shit, if they're ever right in their predictions it will be by pure luck, not skill.
you have no reason to trust people who are right by coincidence.
no one can predict how software will affect our lives so far out in the future, fuck these retards who pretend otherwise.
