>>105894015so what? those parents kids deserve to be hurt? thats really sick of you anon
also, its irrelevant because blockers don't even help
if you weren't a sick fuck addicted to porn you'd actually care about protecting children from all this shit, hell you should know how bad it is considering you're addicted to it
but nah, you'll make this bullshit libertarian argument that just hurts everyone
>>105894030in the first line of your post, you attack my character for not wanting children to watch porn
therefore, you are not arguing in good faith and are likely a horrible person who would put your own addiction over the safety of children
this kind of "no you're the bad one if you care about the wellbeing of others!!!!" propaganda is dead, people see through your shit, anyone with a brain that is
our society is so corrupt at this point that its impossible to fall for your libertarian nonsense
die in a fire, I didn't read the rest of your post