Thread 105893262

Well? How did he?

Slowly.

Apparently scaling from 5000 to 50000 to 5 million on good ol' LAMP isn't so much an issue.

And I'm will to bet scaling to 5 billion on today's hardware with the same setup ain't much of an issue either. Fags just like things to be different.

>>105893262 (OP)
Hey, this looks like VIM but on Windows XP
Wow

>>105893262 (OP)
The website was much simpler. One or more PHP webservers and a thick Database server were more than enough.

This was before "web frameworks" which take 100ms / request before even calling your handler function.

vertical scaling
also load balancing and database partitioning were a thing even back in 2005

>>105893262 (OP)
buy more servers, optimize your shit, cache a lot
lamp were simpler times

>>105893262 (OP)
with windows xp by the looks of it.

>chair covered in cum
>tux plushie but runs XP

???

>>105893404
Econo Family-sized bottle of Nyquill on desk. ROFLMAO

>>105893262 (OP)
Knowing how to design and segment your services, building a caching tier, setting up federated user databases, sticking your groups of servers behind VIPs, config management.

Also daily reminder that serverless is literally just having someone else run the server and provide the one service you need to you. That's been a thing forever.

>>105893262 (OP)
Is that a P Diddy album under the phone?Disgusting.

>>105893262 (OP)
With a fucking web server, php and jewish high-born money.
He waa a sexless webahitter back then
Webshitters are not programmers.
He was a bad developer but because his family had influential friends and money, he landed a gov contract at the CIA.

>>105893262 (OP)
why are there cum stains on his chair

facebook, myspace, and all the major social medias were major security nightmare until they got big capital money.

by paying more money for hosting

>>105893262 (OP)
By hacking PHP, quite literally.

>Serverless
>It's even more servers

>>105893321
back then we had those already