4chan is next, it's over bongbros...

the lazy retard devs won't even move back to 4channel they will just rangeban uk in cloudflare

>>105907634 (OP)
Are you going to miss them?

>>105907634 (OP)
jewed

>>105907634 (OP)
Tor says high so go ne a bigger somewhere else.

>>105908024
Somebody call an ambulance, I think this anon's had a stroke

>>105907634 (OP)
It's way easier for hiro to just rangeban bongland.

>>105908024
4cuck blocks proxies and tor.
>just buy a pass
That's just as bad as verification except now I'm paying.

>>105907634 (OP)
How many ages back do they go ?

the memes became real and nobody is surprised

>>105908072
this is the ideal marriage situation

>>105908072
>half of /gif/ is blacked/cuck/tranny porn
>No Reddit are the cucks.

>>105908072
me on the left

>>105907634 (OP)
Not my problem.

soon I will need a fake ID to use the internet. great.

>>105908072
why are white right wingers so obsessed with black men having sex with their women

>>105908131
that's all jeets

>>105908072
Shitted should be banned sitewide

4chan will just send any complaints to /dev/null. The only recourse the UK has against 4chan is to block it nationwide. There is nothing they can do to either imprison our moderation, fine us, or otherwise remove us from the Internet.

Besides, we've been violating UK law for over a decade by letting lolicon be posted on /b/.

>uk
ho, mince alors, que c'est dommage, merde vraiment, les pauvres rawsbeef, c'est enquiquinant. zut

>>105908196
>their women
their "bitch". (to answer your question, it's a weirdly common trope in rap music)

>>105908205
As if this makes it better.

less than 10k people even care enough to voice their opposition to this so they clearly want it

https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/722903

>>105908158
>he rents video games in the Steam
>he relies on the Reddit for porn
Stupid butt hurt PESKY Steamie! PESKY!

>>105908312
>rap music
It's called hip-hop music, you butt hurt dumb boy!

Hip-hop is the genre, whereas rap is the vocal delivery!

>>105908482
>It's called hip-hop
Brain damage. You just don't know what the jazz is all ABOUT.

>>105907634 (OP)
The web, http, is dead but the net is still alive and well. If people want the old internet and freedom they need to other protocols. Gopher, Gemini, and even a BBS over ssh is better than the http/web.
Sure the user base is smaller but it has zero corporate content.

>>105908554
Gopher and Gemini have nothing like 4chan though, just tech nerds rambling into the void about shit no-one cares about.

>>105908554
you literally can't do anything interesting on gemini. there aren't even any cool looking websites on it, that's how boring it is. it's not the protocol that has to change, it's the mentality. going on tor or i2p is better than this snoozefest.

>>105908573
Someone wrote *chan clone for gopher.
gopher://khzae.net
I don't know how well it will do under load and his site is slow very slow, but you can download the code and it works as a proof of concept.

I told this for years. Decentralize porn websites. Make them like Odysee and porn will continue to thrive.

>>105907634 (OP)
Even for white upper middle class bongs?

are people really okay like this?
I thought they would never take measures like these to not risk revolts

>>105909228
bongs are low IQ retards, they probably don't even understand what the law does

>>105909228
people around the world happily let the government lock them down, why would anyone be mad about having to age verify for porn LOL

>>105907634 (OP)
how do you verify the age of a bot?

>>105907634 (OP)
maybe there's some hope for uk's future after all if they're literally locking the children out of the indoctrination machine they need to produce more far-left weirdos

in the US this is coming for pretty much every red state

i thought about this a while ago, there's a non privacy invasive solution that could work quite well:
at the age of 12 or 13, you're given a government code, like a hash which is able to generate OTP codes. this OTP code would provide proof of age for sites, which could also work in reverse to prevent predators infiltrating children's spaces.
You'd be sent them at two different ages, perhaps 13, then 18.
this hash would then be able to be used on a local device to generate OTP codes anonymously.
then, once you receive the 18 one, you can access adult only sites.

>>105908289
>rawsbeef
Jamais entendu ça avant mais ça sonne super retardé.

>>105909752
this is not about that. this is about using it as an excuse to take freedoms away. it's a "save the puppies" act. what, are you going to be against saving the puppies? what kind of deranged lunatic are you anon?

>>105909815
of course, i understand that, i'm just saying the idea of blocking adult content on the internet is possible to do anonymously.
likely they just know most retards will give into this immediately. i'll stop jacking off before i put my ID into a porno site.

Remember when the advice was to not reveal private information about you on the internet and now you need to ID yourself for literally anything

they should use chainlink DECO

>>105909832
>dude you need to let the government control your ability to see nudity because reasons like children maybe?
you judeo-christian vermin retards seriously need to die. the people in charge are flying to islands to rape and murder kids and you're such a fucking retard loser subhuman you think giving them more control over you in any way will somehow do good.

>tranny walkng around outside exposing themselves to kids = YES! BRAVE!!! YES!! introduce sexuality to them!!!
>parents stopping their kids from visiting websites? too much burden of responsiblity!
kys

>Labour are the adults are in the room government
>get in
>scrap project that will allow you to buy an online pass locally
>scrap Rwanda scheme
>keep every other bad bit of legislation
>don't bother to legislate or set up verification schemes
>let everyone play FFA as you fight for lobbying money
>while doing this block a simple law that will compel government works to tell the truth under an inquest or inquiry
Keir Starmer sure is the son of a toolmaker.
The labour right are a joke. Mandelson should perish in the US like the natives.

>>105910022
Starmer used to be a human rights lawyer. Go figure.

>>105910022
>>105910058
>Keir Starmer sure is the son of a toolmaker.
I had to google that and ha, that is one of the most hilarious distortions of the truth I've ever seen. Kier, not his dad, mind, OWNED a tool factory. He's literally a bourgeois factory owner talking down to the proles and telling them what's good for them.

>>105909986
WARNING: Patient has NOT had medication administered. Approach carefully.

I'm American and supported tea tax nigger removal.

>>105908418
To be fair, not only is the petitions system useless but you need to have faith the government will legislate to change.
The system is
>sign
>get response saying government is looking into it or won't bother
>get more signatures
>debated in parliament
>100k folks say we've bollocksed up the legislation
>quote from the ministers involved
>oppo whines about how they had the idea set up
>current government does fuck all
>not considered
EVEN IF you get to the stage where opposition benches draft legislation, submit it, it gets a hearing in parliament, you rely on the government to then not block the legislation.
Currently Labour's 404, 403? Majority has 333 ministers ready to shoot it down, because they'll do what they're told because the PLP is a bunch of cunts.
If only 50 of them are willing to rebel against benefit cuts that would have been <£5bn over 5 years while approving several billion per year on F35's, and they're also in seats that they'll get booted from for voting for it. Yeah, no chance at all of anything reasonable coming out of a petition.

Labour simply don't care.
Morgan McSweeney is a political genius and caters to the reform voters who will float to Labour (these do not exist). All the while implementing policies that make that segment of the electorate and their own left voters seethe.
You simply cannot comprehend the 38D anti-dimensional Malaysion Mahjongg plays. It'll be a sweep in 2029. Every seat will turn red.

>>105910058
>>105910084
Be quiet. You sound like a pedophile. Seething coomer. Be quiet.

>>105909986
GCHQ, arrest this pedophile who wants to expose kids to pornography.

>>105909851
The concept is bad enough in itself.
With the idea of digital ID or a government approved scheme you buy in a local shop for cash, that's a nightmare in itself.
Now imagine that no such digital ID scheme or pass you can input exists and it all relies on third parties to verify your information, be it via a picture or scans of government ID (passport, driving license). Some say they'll store it for 7 or 14 days, it won't be used for anything.
Yeah, do you trust that? I don't. Waiting to see you're on a massive data breach and what accounts that ID was used to authenticate on? yeah, that's the life.

The best thing we'd get out of this is that some MPs are proper degenerates but like we already know Streeting is a bummer, we know Liz Kendall wants to murder kids. We don't care about where they get money from, the expenses scandal was a once in a generation moment of caring about sleaze.
It's dystopian, authoritarian nonsense with that class New Labour incompetence on top.

So long, farewell. Auf wiedersehen, adieu.

>>105908131
That's literally jews anon. Also /gif/ is half-sized as of a year or two ago so it's proportionally more than it used to be.

>rich / upper-middle class "leftist" is a traitorious fuck and doesn't actually give a shit about people, to the point of implementing more authoritarian crap than even cuckservatives
why is this happening everywhere in the west? and why shouldn't all these fucking politicians be hanged mussolini style as a warning to future politicians to make sure they understand the message?

>>105910460
Proof? Oh wait you have none.

>>105908062
works on my machine

You will own nothing
You will comply with the law and present your ID to browse any website on the internet
You will go to jail for opening CP (anime loli) on the terrorist site 4chan

>>105907691
Competition prevents Indians from creating a space shuttle?

>>105910769
The actual economic left is dead in much the West, especially Anglosphere countries, since the US spent about a century painstakingly uprooting it whenever possible to stop the Soviets. Unfortunately they went beyond kicking around idiots who worship Stalin, so now the "left" is about worshiping sodomites instead because they're not a threat to the status quo.

>>105907634 (OP)
We’ve always verified ages here.

>>105907634 (OP)
how do they k ow your from the UK? IP? what if you use a VPN from time to time? language? time zone?

>>105911874
Oi, you got a loicense for that vpn?

VPN lobby is real

>>105907634 (OP)
Who gives a fuck about Londonistan
They chose this fate

>>105907634 (OP)
Fucking good, kids shouldn't be anywhere near social media.

Guess it's not going to be long until the UK is more of a shithole than China when it comes to governmental blocking, thanks for increasing my internet bill by forcing me to avoid this shit.

Are there any decent VPNs that still let you post here?

>>105912715
See >>105911652

>>105907634 (OP)
OI, DO YOU HAVE A LOICENSE FOR THAT?

>>105912674
Do you understand that (you) will send your id to 4chan mods?

>>105907634 (OP)
As far as I know, 4chan has no company presence in the UK or EU, so good fucking luck.

>>105907634 (OP)
reddit has an office in london so it has a british company and is subject to its laws. 4chan doesn't and isn't.

>>105912674
>i'm too stupid to parent my children so the government should do it for me
kys

Doxing yourself to use reddit is like paying thieves to get robbed

im sure london cares about the 100 ppl left on this site.

>>105911633
Every time something goes down in Israel /gif/ magically slows down and blacked threads don't get reposted.

>>105909752
This wouldn't provide anonymity. The hash is mapped to your identity.

>>105907634 (OP)
allowing whores to post their nudes in there for the sole purpose of promoting their onlyfans account was a mistake

>>105908482
>steamie
SAAAAAAAAAAAAAR BLOODY BENCHOD BASTARD DO NOT REDEEM THE STEAM SAR I RAPE YOU TODAY FUCKING BITCH BASTARD

>>105913741
they do actually

>>105907634 (OP)
>political propaganda slop

>>105907634 (OP)
Actually kinda based?
>b-b-but M-M-MUH FREEEEEEEEEDUMBS!
Just like you are not free to enter one's private property, or drive under the influence, or be a MAP, you also shouldn't be allowed to influence little kids with propaganda online that's hard to oversee for their caretakers.

>>105914725
Retard, they should do this >>105909752 instead. If not this then it's better to not do anything at all. Lol, if you really believe what you said, post photo of your id right now, I will verify whether you are grown up.

>>105914768
You have no authority over me, and no credibility or any sort of guarantee/law signing that would guarantee my data to remain safe when viewed by you. Why would I show you my ID? Are you incapable of using your monkey brain? In what universe is what you just said a gotcha? I... I don't know anon, you are one fucking drooling dumb fuck, and it's really a shame your parents have to cope with you bringing them shame every day.

>>105913802
yes, the hash would be (after all, you'd have to be able to request a new one), but the OTP codes it produces wouldn't necessarily be.

>>105913064
I hope so, but the articles say they can 'fine' and ultimately get court orders to block websites at ISP level.

>>105910769
>>105911738
This. It's been dead since the 80's in a lot of countries, the UK was one of the first to do the neoliberal meme with Thatcher.
Now everybody opts into the same consumer protection style laws, licensing agreements etc.

Basically, fiat currency + neoliberal capitalism killed a lot of social democracy. It's still there in some European countries but since the entire world has gotten progressively more insane since the mid 00's when normalfags got online. You've also got to remember that the GFC happened, everyone got bailed out, no punishments and that class warfare hate and tension just got pushed into austerity and other types of class warfare, direction politics and culture wars got introduced instead.
All while politicians get lobbied to hell and back, they're cheap lays. The big tent "left" groups are demonised by a right wing press, perform purges (trot hunting) and are better at the performative cruelty due to blaming it on technocracy.

Starmer's Labour is occupied by Israel, from his wife to policies on culture, tech. They're "tougher than the tories" which means that if you didn't lobby them, you're out of luck, worker or "undeserving poor", it matters not.
Why'd it change? In the UK at least, unions lost their grip during neoliberalism, fewer and fewer workers in a union, less bargaining power so the right occupied Labour, Kinnock and Blair opened the door to it. Electoral turnout changed and the UK doesn't have a great system to begin with, since FPTP is inherently unbalanced. Look at Wes Streeting, the health secretary, the guy is fucking detested, funded by health insurance companies etc, his majority was only 528 votes on 59.76% turnout. 78,567 registered voters but he can get in on 15,647 votes. FPTP is broken.

In other nations, it'll be lobbying money and the press, same story. People, the general public are buffoons, but also they complain and they don't vote. Democracy is dead and the "markets" killed it.

>>105914725
You can't seriously believe this

>>105909752
sorry that doesnt work. think of all the data we could harvest and sell that wed be missing out on if we did that

>>105912715
>Guess it's not going to be long until the UK is more of a shithole than China
>until
Funny joke.
>>105914725
>you also shouldn't be allowed to influence little kids with propaganda online that's hard to oversee for their caretakers.
Right. You get more credit for caring about muh chillens if your government isn't trying to push them into poverty and crush their futures. It matters not which "side" you're on.
Parents allowed the internet to raise their kids because wages stagnated and government policy is there to keep them poor. Even systems designed to lift them out of poverty are unbalanced.

I want kids to raise their kids properly, not give them phones, tablets, access to the internet at large like the good old days but I'm a schizo.
Raise wages, allow for good childcare schemes, incentivise people to raise their children, introduce laws specifically to punish parents for allowing the internet to act as a child minder if you wish. There system is a blanket punishment for everyone, because of the chillens. They don't have the moral and ethical high ground here.

Worry not. Here's a Dear Paul, email they sent me yesterday. This is from the party that drafted the legislation and voted it in, Labour will NOT remove the cap, they suspended MP's for voting for an amendment to remove the cap, they've turned to demonising the disabled for watering down a welfare reform bill and that's now the reason the kids in poverty can't be lifted out.
There's no other way, can't improve their lives.
If you want to remove propaganda, remove think tanks, jail these daft cunts running the conservatives campaigns.
Find the daft cunt who sends phrases like:
>Creating an unfair, two-tier system rewarding the takers, not the makers.
and don't pay him for it, end his life on live stream, because who were the daft cunts who oversaw all that wage stagnation and introduced the child benefit cap
>Which is why in 2017 we introduced the two-child benefit cap.
Right then.

>>105915089
censorship is based in most cases, free will doesnt exist anyways so seething that you are artificially goaded into thinking something and then being buttmad you cant spout your shit opinion into everyone's face everywhere including online is retarded. the internet should be a gated walled garden with compartments, the normalGODS should only be allowed to a hyper censored google search, youtube, and meta sites, or netflix and spotify, while the social outcast criminal freaks are hunted down and punished if they engage with weirdo sites that dont require identification cards, eye scans, fingerprints, and adresses and phone numbers to access them. TOTAL. CRIME. DEATH. makes coaly people seethe because its gemmy
>>105915174
children are our future albeitforth we cant let them roam freely in the dangerous web. and no victim blaming the parents or kids for living in a society with high pressure on them to conform and partake in bad things is not the epic own you think it is.

>>105907634 (OP)
good riddance, no more retarded brits posting here

>its da big brother and orwell o algo
do unemployed niggas REALLY?

>>105907634 (OP)
>stop killing games: OMG DADDY GOVERNMENT HELP US
>what the government is actually concerned with:

>>105915232
baited nobody award

>>105915256
ts nga unmeplyd an thnk bout orwl nd censrn... smdh....heartbroken

what will 4chan do for this? I can't even buy a 4chan pass anymore (since they only have crypto support and that particular coinbase thing doesn't work in the uk either)

>>105915297

>>105915299
If you have a metamask wallet you can pay through there, you just have to navigate to the pass site through its built in browser, then coinbase handles the payment.

>>105915337
GEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEG literally looks like 90% of chan, yjk he has yellow teeth and his pecker is shriveled and he's a manlet under 6'1 GEEEEEEEEEEEEG

>>105915379
ok but then that doesn't actually verify my age, does it?

>>105915297
"ts nga" dead flower emoji

BONG BROS WHAT THE FUCK RISE UP

>>105915391
blud what are these incomprehensible woahjacks

>>105914807
>would guarantee my data to remain safe
Your data will not be safe, all guarantees are a joke. It gets sold/stolen from literally everywhere, from government, from banks, of course it will be stolen from shitty websites. Like the proverb says, if you give the money, be ready to never receive it back, the same works for data. If you give it, consider it already in hacker/"advertiser"/police databases. With "advertiser" I mean not just literal advertisers but those scary companies which buy all the data and don't interact with the market in any other way.
So what I mean is that giving your id to some website is almost equivalent to posting it in this thread. I wanted to check whether you are honest with yourself and are actually not afraid of data being exposed, but seems like you are just retarded and actually think that it will be safe lol. Well good luck with that, I once saw my data in hacker database and believe me it was very unpleasant.

the pirate bay has been ISP banned for over a decade, and any jackass can easily find it
take solace in the apparent fact that result don't matter, only intentions

>>105907634 (OP)
there's underage retards here? would explain a lot

>>105907691
>they will just rangeban uk in cloudflare
god I hope you're right

>>105915601
Retarded take. Yes everyone is aware that technically anyone could misuse your personal information, including your boss and place of employment, and your hospital and doc, and your school, and your uni, and your family and friends, and your bank, and in the same vain your email and google/microsoft/apple or whatever. The reason people still do it is because it's convenient and a shit ton of people are all giving away their data and if it was missused then the company would ruin itself and owners end up in jail. So everyone concludes it's safe to do, and the slight risk of it happening is outweighed by all the convenience and ease of use as well as other pros. If you genuinely think black and white like you try to larp with your purity tests on 4chan, you should considering putting a bullet through your neanderthal low IQ skull since all your personal info is already used by your country and government who are actually the most likely to conscript you or put you in jail and take away your autonomy, not google putting your data through a mixer and then telling company_5695404TM what kind of videos you like on youtube and whether you are the correct audience for a product to shave your balls hair

>>105915201
Go back.

>>105909752
Stop giving the government ideas you fucking retard. You're meant to tell them they're retarded and this is infesable

>>105915718
>as well as other pros
What other pros?

>bootleg porn seller will be an actual occupation by 2030 in le free west
think I'm gonna stockpile on carrier pigeons since drones will be outlawed as well by then

>>105915740
nah, imma do my own thang.
>>105915862
syncing between personal machines, easy collabing and easy communication with coworkers or friends or family. most normgroids also love algorithms and would be mad at you if you disabled the algorithm in fucking youtube or pinterest so that they are forced to search for shit themselves instead of being recommended stuff based of what they looked at before

Imagine showing some of these posts to a /g/ user in 2015, this site is so fucked.

>>105915922
The hacker ethic has truly been lost.
You should be forced to pledge allegiance to Stallman and the FSF before being able to even use this board.

>>105915967
stallman is an ineffective retard in love with pointless purity tests that make sure nothing worth doing ever gets accomplished
he's like a computer nerd version of a far-left schizo

>>105916037
Purity tests are needed to filter people like you

>>105916055
I, too, enjoy intellectual masturbation and holier-than-thou preaching rather than actually doing anything useful

>>105909228
>I thought they would never take measures like these to not risk revolts
the government openly states how much they despise us and we've got no arms. nobody can actually do anything, because this is a hell surveillance state if any 'protest' happens thats not agreeing with parliament they're immediately swarmed by x10 counter protestors, and then in the following weeks rounded up and arrested because the entire country is covered in CCTV and every Internet connection goes through GCHQ. there fundamentally is no hope on this island

>>105916174
Thank god we have massive corporate entities whose only goals are profit and economy growing, so they will never allow the political lobbies to get funding or politicians to be rich and powerful if they try to missuse their user data for mass surveilance and mass arrests. Unironically based capitalism, thank fucking God for based big tech. Imagine if only foss and powerless small entities existed and government could just control them into anything

>>105916037
He IS a far left schizo just read his sucking website

>>105916076
holy projecting

>>105907634 (OP)
Yet again using legislation to try and fix lazy and tech illiterate parenting and poor education by people who hand preteens smartphones and tablets with the rails off.

Then again my brother lets his kids have virtually unsupervised free accesst the internet because whenever he enforces anything they just have melty, and honestly YT kids is full of horrible slop.

>>105909228
People are against it, and plenty of of people speak out against it but the media smeers them as sickos and pedos

>>105907634 (OP)
I fucking knew it. slippery slope

>>105915076
They're trying to get rid of FPTP.

4chan still hasn't done its' risk assessment, has it not? For starters, illegal content is the main problem, before we even get at age verification.
/b/ contains loli/shota, which are illegal in the UK, but not in the US. There is also /t/ linking to Torrents, containing links to illegal copies of British TV shows and movies
I dont see this site lasting in the UK in the future, but any measures to block access will mean archive sites and underground altchans will rise up instead

>>105915076
People are waking up to this at least and getting more informed, but to fight against neoliberalism I think a lot of people are going to have to swallow their pride and side with the trannies and whoever else you personally dislike. Which I know probably upsets a lot of people, but the right has spent over 40 years trying to fragment the left into squabbling packs with a lot of success.

The right squabbles a lot too, but unlike the left that defends into infighting they are oddly capable of pulling together to get a compromised version of their various agendas through.

>>105916826
4chan can coast on obscurity now hopefully, bigger and nastier sites than 4chan have emerged and most of the worst and noisiest people have filtered out to those.

>>105916860
Those bigger and nastier sites have the advantage of more money. 4chan operates at a loss, despite the pass system.
If 4chan is fined exorbitant amounts by Ofcom, it could mean the end of this site to an extent

>>105916826
>>105916860
The most sensible strat would be to just block UK users so they have to use a VPN and pay for a pass.

>>105917076
VPNs are almost always blocked from posting, so that's out of the question.

>>105917301
Oh no, what a shame, no UK users, oh no. I'm weeping I'm weeping. What a shame.
(Bye)

>>105917322
This. How many bongs visit this site anyway?

>>105917301
4chan pass cucks can post with a VPN.

>surely taking away the pressure valve from our increasingly angry young white men will solve things
What is with their government?

EU, Australia and US are doing the same.

>>105915201
t. Xi Jinping

>>105917402
Sir Kier is trying to annoy as many demographics as possible

>>105908554
>>105908573
>>105908750
>>105908784
What is there intersting on gopher, gemini or BBSes?

Doesnt need to be social media or image boards, but something worth checking out.

>>105915718
>noooo, I NEED to give my id to every website I visit, here's why it's actually a good thing

>The reason people still do it is because it's convenient
because rich people are retarded and poor people also are retarded or have no time for it

>and owners end up in jail
LOL I won't even comment this, pure delusion

>your country and government who are actually the most likely
They can demand private companies to share data with them. I'm starting to think you are actually younger than 18...

>>105907634 (OP)
>age verification required to post on the asscrack of the internet
This is strictly a good thing. We should also implement IQ verification as a baseline and an employment status checker for /twg/.

>>105908062
>4cuck blocks proxies
posting from one right now :^)

>>105918204
MODS MODS MODS

Hash matching and AI scanning of images when?
CSAM has the potential to stay up for hours and this site has no countermeasure against it

You people are so silly lol there won't be a digital ID you have to use to use the internet that is conspiracy nonsense

>>105917799
nothing

>>105913071
Just being accessed in uk means it services uk, meaning it's subject to uk laws(in their rotten subject-hating pigfeast minds). 4chin.fbi.gub has no official presence in the uk so it will just be firewalled

>>105908062
pass is best

>>105917076
Why pay for a pass when you can post for free?

>>105908554
As soon as those protocols have something the government deems unsafe in great quantities, they will be blocked on provider level. This is already happening in many countries that block VPNs and torrents. Ironically http is almost the best option, since they can't block it and proxies can mask themselves as generic http traffic... for now.

>>105908418
this will do nothing, none of these petitions ever result in change

>>105908173
That's simple - generate a mugshot using AI (local) and muck around in photoshop.
Maybe use your own passport but changes the codes a bit and obviously your name and slap in a new 'photo'.

>>105911731
No, money.

>>105915889
>since private drone ownership will be outlawed by then too
ftfy

https://www.ofcom.org.uk/online-safety/illegal-and-harmful-content/investigation-into-4chan-and-its-compliance-with-duties-to-protect-its-users-from-illegal-content
It's over

>>105928071
It's always about protection. my ass

>>105917433
exactly
what will be the remedy for this?
inb4 vpn
no they'll outlaw those

>>105928216
kick out jews and the politicians that sold us out to them. Easy solution

>>105928265
*muslims

>>105928606
muslims too I dont care. kikes, mudslimes, jeets.

>>105928620
based

>>105916721
The whole EU will follow suit, within an unified framework and digital id wallet. Editors must comply. All under the guise of (((our democracy))) is under threat. Sapnish MP suggested to tie social media accounts to digital ID during the WEF meeting earlier this year.
Age verification for websites that may have sensitive content > ID verification and citizenship proofs for social media (because of the romanian elections incident) > proof of personhood tied to digital ID for other sites with user comments

>>105928717
he got literally everything right

>>105928899
you don't even need muh ai for that, people will gladly give up most of their rights to stop terrorists and save the children

>>105929064
people will give up their rights out of fear of losing comofrtability. they dont care about kids or terrorists.

>>105907634 (OP)
A few different ways to get around it o algo.

>>105908554
Retard. Tell me, just what exactly prevents you from starting a new non-corporate website on the web?
>but corporate web drowns out the rest
then create your own search engine which only shows good websites. It has absolutely nothing to do with the protocol.

>>105909752
How would you prevent people from creating servers which generate codes from their hash for underage people?

>>105908024
Reddit Onion Service dosen't work because retards implemented Captcha

>>105908418
>https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/722903

I can't belive it's stalled 14k

>>105910058
This act of parliament was created by the nasty party, not the Labour Party

>>105908062
>he doesn't know

>>105908418
bongs are a very servile people
it's honestly rather weird

>>105908784
It shouldn't be too hard to make a Gemini version

>>105929508
it could have 10 million signatures, the response would be "we were elected to ensure the safety of children and this law provides that"

>>105909832
>I can't stop touching my penis so we must implement a worldwide stalinist censorship regime

>>105930224
But so few people caring in the first place is still weird, even if it's ultimately futile surely people would at least want to voice their opposition to this.

>>105917799
20forbeers is a bbs i haunt that has an active community. Plenty of nets to shitpost on which is what is important.

>>105930375
well, for starters there's been very little reporting on this, if you surveyed actual britons i reckon 90% wouldn't even know this law existed. of those that remain there'd be a good portion who think "well it stops kids going to pornhub and i don't use pornhub so it doesn't affect me anyway". finally, out of the very small number that both know and care about the law the idea of signing the petition isn't very appealing because the response is always some flavour of "no".
https://petition.parliament.uk/
it's a shitty situation but i can't imagine any successinve government repealing laws that give them this much power an neither can i imagine the country suddenly rising up against the tyranny. we've been declining for a long time but all we ever do is shanke our heads, tut and pretend everythings fine.

>>105930532
but why would stopping "kids" from going to pornhub be needed
either kids are kids and they have no interest in sex or they're teenagers who can apparently fuck but not watch people fuck
it's extremely retarded and based on the false assumptions in the first place

>>105930562
The porn angle is only there to make this difficult to discuss publicly, you can just write everyone off opposing the bill as a sex freak/pedo. This works extremely well on Brits.

>>105930571
obviously, but the incels arguing in favor of it here are doing it because they unironically believe the porn meme

>>105930582
desu I'm not even interested in that angle, making web hosts legally liable for anything posted is a much bigger problem since it effectively makes small scale forums, game servers, chat rooms etc. impossible to host in the UK

>>105930595
>>105930582
Also notice how people like Elon who has commented on UK politics before are totally ignoring this, because big corps can afford 24/7 moderation and the law forces UK users onto their platforms as those are the only ones with the resources to satisfy the requirements of the law.

>>105930595
just host shit on tor at this point, the clearnet is too popular
even relatively unknown sites are spammed with bots trying to nuke them

>>105930616
obviously
the government will say we allow sites to self-moderate
the standards for self-moderation are so high you need 24/7 monitoring
therefore the site cannot self-moderate and must be censored

>the standards for self-moderation are so high you need 24/7 monitoring
>therefore the site cannot self-moderate and must be censored

>>105930562
Theres a whole lot of stuff in the media about kids (boys) watching porn and learning from violent and extreme porn and forcing girls to do EXTREME things like anal or bdsm or whatever.
Funny thing my first girlfriend was the one to suggest anal and being tied up. Honestly most women I've known were bigger freaks than men. Most men are fucking vanilla AF, but maybe zoomers are different.

Just teach them properly about consent and shit at school, and maybe accept people can be into weird shit.

>>105930721
as you said, that's a biased moral panic way to view it, where people can't do things because the old farts in charge think they're icky
by that same logic we should ban movies because they learn to shoot at people and beat them up
both men and women have their own interests in sex, and what some sexless 50 year old bureaucrat cat lady considers extreme is irrelevant to the people trying to have sex with each other
people should be exposed to more types of sex and calmly explained that everyone has different tastes instead of pretending shoving it in the ass is some radical new idea humans haven't been doing for 3000 years and shaming them

>>105930721
All of that is just a distraction from the fact that our 'mysoginy' epidemic is due to demographic shifts.

>>105909228
When polled on stuff the average voter in the UK is shockingly authoritarian and welcome this stuff with open arms.
Most policies here boil down to ban [thing].

>>105915297
>only fans banning porn
wait.... it wasn't just a porn site???

>>105930929
Mainly because people are too stupid to understand the consequences of what they're asking for/think it won't affect them.

>give phones to kinds at younger and younger ages
>no supervised access any more
>kids go on sites they're not supposed to
>instead of it being the fault of the parents, it's now the fault of the site owners
>easiest way is just to block access to users from the UK, only the most popular sites that get major traffic will implement the ID checking
>either way, VPN subscriptions will skyrocket just to bypass it
>nothing stopping kids from just buying VPN subscriptions and bypassing the whole thing anyway
It's so tiresome

>>105931523
VPNs will just be banned next

>>105918286
I will reluctantly take up the task of gathering images and videos to train the AI

It's been over since TPM was introduced.
You will be able to be tracked to what you bought and used.

>>105931523
>the sites were also never that harmful to begin with
>it was always 90% pearlclutching about religious feefees

>>105932539
she cute

>>105907634 (OP)
Good, I don't want to hear the opinions of third-world subhumans anyway.

>>105933621
:^(

>>105931532
Just use tor

>>105934778
What if they ban tor?

>>105934795
you can't ban tor, because you can use a bridge so it seems like it's a normal HTTP connection

>>105934795
>banning a CIA honeypot

>>105934877
they would do that though, decisions here are made without much thought

>>105931523
this. why don't parents just buy dumbphones for their children?
somebody said that a phone is just a car, it doesn't check if the user has a licence or not. society simply accept the risk that children might steal your keys and drive. if they do, then it's the parents who get blamed for bad education. nobody ever thought of putting a licence reader on cars as a good solution, even though modern new cars are already so full on bloat that it would technically be possible.

>>105931523
Guess who owns the VPN companies. =)

>>105935956
>why don't parents just buy dumbphones for their children?
it's by design. The corporation and the state merged. A worse turn out than religion merging with the state.

>>105929305
>op about governments requiring websites to follow the gay law
>anon suggests alternative protocols that are too obscure for governments to care
>hurr why not use the web
i'm taking away your R word pass

We should just put all the children in concentration camps until they are 18, to protect them.

>18 to watch porn
>16 to have sex
>18 to play call of duty
>16 to join the army
u wot and wot u wot WANKA

>>105936521
all of those should be 0
the state has no business regulating the personal lives of people

So what makes this different than the numerous times in the past 20 years that the UK has talked about banning things when they have no fucking clue on what they actually are? There was once talk of banning "esoteric content" but the government is mostly tech illiterate boomers and nothing ever actually happens.

>>105936561
Sites have actually started to comply now
as long as that continues, it's over

>>105936545
>implying hairless monkeys can regulate their lives by themselves effectively
>implying public resources can be managed responsibly with everyone doing whatever they want

fences are useful things
a tiger will jump over, a snake will slither through, but at least the cattle won't run away or sth

>>105936572
But how the fuck would Ofcom actually do anything to US hosts? They have no jurisdiction

>>105936561
They weren't retarded enough to actually follow through on it those times

>>105936599
Nothing, US hosts will just block UK users. The real concern is the damage this does to people within the UK wanting to host their own sites.

threadly reminder that the UK forced Apple to disable E2E encryption for UK users

>>105936612
>US hosts will just block UK users
but why? just don't set foot in the UK if you're a host, lol

>>105936636
in the case that ofcom cannot fine or otherwise force compliance they'll likely just tell ISPs to block the site for UK users

>>105936734
like with gdpr, they can issue court orders for it globally if the services are servicing the UK
obviously you're right that blocking the UK will be the first course of action instead

>>105936599
bongs have always been quite overrepresented on the web, you'd be surprised how many old forums and sites are physically located on that cursed island. for them it doesn't even matter if the hosting is physically located somewhere else, the fact that it can 'potentially serve UK-based users' means that you get the boot in your face no matter what, and while the rest of the world can laugh and ignore (until the same thing happens in your country, in ~3-5 years) for those who are stuck on that island physically escaping is no longer an option

>>105908062
Whites have passes.
Browns don't.

>>105907634 (OP)
why ddi they vote for this

>>105907634 (OP)
What's wrong with that?

>>105937000
>maybe if you vote harder your elites will want you dead less

>>105928899
>muh vidya graymes
>muh fantasies
Grow up.

>>105913009
Ok, and?

>>105937044
gaymes and fantasies are for grown ups

>>105937068
What's it feel like knowing no woman will ever touch you?

>>105937077
But a woman did touch me around 4 hours ago?

>>105908158
You know... I hope they just outright ban VPNs and proxies at this point.

>>105907691
>no bongjeets
>less jeets in general
sounds like a plan

>>105937085
y

>>105937217
Because you're basically breaking the law if you're doing it to circumvent laws.

>>105937261
1. basically breaking the law will not actually hold up in court, convictions need guilt beyond reasonable doubt
2. it's just the law faggot, billions of people break it every day, the government can't prosecute everyone

>>105937279
That's why I said they should ban them instead of arresting everyone. I have hope my government will do it.

>>105937310
bans need to be enforced, saying just ban x has the same logic as make crime illegal

>>105937327
Yeah, but it still mitigates it even if a few people break the law most people will obey the law.

>>105937354
>most people will obey the law
you must be over 18 to post here

>>105907634 (OP)
Heh

>>105937363
I am, and I'm more than happy to be a law abiding citizen. I don't care if some website asks for my ID to verify my age, why should you?

>>105937372
Because unlike you I'm not cattle and I will never support any form of statism and governments trying to tell me what I'm allowed to see, read, or talk about.

>>105937382
So you're a schizo got it. Do you have a job at least?

>>105937386
I accept your concession

>>105937396
Do you have a job or not?

>>105937401
I do have a job bro

>>105937409
Well at least you're above other schizos here I'll give you that.

Bong bros rise up.

>>105936328
>>anon suggests alternative protocols that are too obscure for governments to care
It's no different from creating a new website on the web that is too obscure for governments to care about. Nope, you're retarded.

>>105938062
if you don't see the difference between hosting a website on the web, that is being crawled, scanned, and indexed constantly, and that even your grandma recognizes in some form, and hosting a website on gopher, which no government worker would even know what that is even if you told them, then you are really lacking imagination
it's much like saying something on social media like facebook or twitter against saying something in an online game chatroom among your friends
anyway i'm gonna stop replying to you now, it's kinda icky to talk to aggressive brainlets like you and having to explain the obvious

>>105916773
I'm not surprised lmao

>>105916826
>I dont see this site lasting in the UK in the future
There's no way the government will give Ofcom any additional money to fund the enforcement of these laws. So it'll be like the TV licence; sure, you can get arrested if you watch TV without paying, but that literally never happens because enforcing the laws is a waste of money. They're just passing these laws so they can have an excuse to ban any website in future that steps out of line.

>before the Internet
>people had a social life
>children who began to develop their sexuality tried to get a source of porn, which sometimes resulted in hilarious adventures
Maybe killing social media off is the future after all.

>>105936521
This just in:
>16 to vote
Now they only need to ban over-65s from voting.

>>105938263
yes, there is effectively no difference. The fact that it is being crawled and indexed matters none. If it's not beyond a certain threshold of popularity the law will not do anything about it. You can literally buy drugs on the clearnet. If they're not effective at policing sites which are obviously illegal internationally and have been for a long time, how effective do you think will britbongs be at controlling access to sexual content on some random website?
>aggressive
if you weren't such a newfaggot you would be long desensitized to this.

>>105940071
But yes, you are technically right that the chance of being banned is lower on some obscure protocol that nobody uses. Although at this point, you might as well not host it all. If the only thing you're optimizing is the probability of not getting banned by the UK, it's definitely the safest option by far.

>>105916318
I have 3 children and don’t let them use the internet at all. Videogames still exist. So do crayons and paper. People who let their kids on the internet must hate their children and hate being parents. There is so much that can distract a child. No need to put their self esteem at risk or enable them to talk to predators online.

>>105909752
Cool idea, and even though the government would be able to trace it back to you, they can already do that now anyway.
The major issue with the implementation of an age gate is having ANY information stored with private companies, which your idea avoids.

>>105907634 (OP)
The devs on this site has abandoned features because they're too lazy to fix them or don't even know how they worked in the first place.

>>105929508
They never had any sort of secular republican revolution like the mainland so the medieval class system is still deeply ingrained in their culture. They're basically European pajeets. Or increasingly actual pajeets.

how about instead we ban kids from using internet how about that????

>>105926688
competition prevents jeets from getting money?

>steam raped to death by payment processors
>dlsite also raped to death
>most manga sites also double raped
>UK demands age verification
>EU digital identity
>US porn bans
we are entering the bad times because the weak men are ruining everything

>>105941906
muh children is just an excuse to censor

I'm archiving some old threads I like in preparation for the block. It's going to suck not being able to talk to anons and have a laugh on /tv/, /mu/, /lit/ etc. 4chan has always been there for me and I miss it already. I thought we had more time.

https://www.getsinglefile.com/

>>105908418
Would be nice if an eceleb mentioned this so it didn't just stall out

>Government responds to all petitions that get more than 10,000 signatures
What does that mean? Currently it's at 16K.

>>105907710
You don't belong here, go back

If you want to protect your nation's children, protecting the family unit and protecting the borders should be the starting point, not the last.

Looking through the other existing petitions it's looking pretty grim and even if the government responds the petition itself doesn't seem to sway opinion one way or the other, they can just tell you to fuck off and go ahead and do what they like, or just lie that they're fixing the problem.

Also I found this counter-petition which is really cool. Thanks lady, this is exactly what we all need, more anarcho-tyranny.

>>105942480
You get an answer telling you to fuck off

>>105942480
response just means it got a write up from some government intern, you can see the list of responses here:
https://petition.parliament.uk/#petitions-with-response
the 100,000 signatures means it will actually be discussed in the parliament building.
Here's an example of this debate:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KZ9UgNNblhc

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-07-11/age-verification-search-engines/105516256

It's not looking good in Australia either.

>>105942090
just call it what it is. jews

>>105942628
https://www.threads.com/@dianakilduff/post/DMOQHWRAWkR

exactly the kind of dysgenic freak you'd expect created that kek, bongs are disgusting creatures

>>105908024
You can say "hi" and "nagger," anon.

>>105907634 (OP)
They didn't perform any updates in over a decade. You really think they'll implement some agegate shit? No, they'll just rangeban all UK IPs.

>>105911731
>>105907691
there is poop outside their space agency. It's sad really.

>>105943020
UK IPs account for like 1/4 of 4chan's total traffic if I recall correctly. Surely they can extend a courtesy and age-gate the porn boards and leave the blue boards.

>>105907634 (OP)
It's a little bold of them to go after porn, video games, and even forums all at once while raping a bunch of kids and not even pretending to listen to their electorate while the economy is contracting.

It's like they actually want to be publicly executed.

Oh no! Now we'll have to get a life outside the Internet! Maybe have a job, a partner etc!

>>105934877
Yes because why would you give that much power/buried skeltons/human capital to a foreign agency (regardless of bioluminiscence)?

>>105942090
So what are the strong men doing about this?

>>105943053
That's the thing is all the stuff outside has been destroyed over the past 20-30 years there. The women that weren't raped or convinced to have the tits cut off where told the men hate them. The economy is completely flattened and the remaining jobs that pay well enough to live independently have been intentionally given to foreigners. Porn and the internet existed to distract the population from this so they didn't start killing people. Removing that is probably not going to improve things (or heh, I guess maybe it ultimately will.)

>>105943046
There's no way it's that high, maybe 20 years ago it was.

>>105943084
Yeah I was pretty off on that. https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/statistics/countries/

>>105943061
fucking each other in the butt

>>105943045
deep poop poop magnificent express space star+ saar craft

>>105907634 (OP)
he just said..

>>105936373

>>105942090
>men
it's jews inabling femoids

>>105943061
the strong men are already dead, they fought to bring forth more rights for everyone
this led to weak men that want to give those rights back to the government because it hurts their feefees

>>105943053
I will not touch the grass

>>105943061
Never heard about pic rel? We are at the beginning of phase 4.

>>105945819
You will not find weaker men than those in the UK either, physically and mentally.

>>105907634 (OP)
Range ban Brits

>>105943061
The strong men don't exist yet. They will be created slowly now.

>>105946964
in 20 years we'll finally have gen beta raging against the evil zoomers and their puritanical censorship machine

>>105907634 (OP)
Just so people understand, the uk government don't want this to prove you're 18. They want your identity on record, if you post something they don't like. Then they can send the cops as they do over twitter posts.

>>105915174
>single mum with no job plops out 20 kids
>i should have to pay for her to look after them
get to absolute fuck. either get her working or take the kids off her.
two as the limit is more than fair we should be reducing the number of poor people bleeding the country dry not trying to expand it exponentially.

>>105946993
gen beta will be the millennials of the 2040s.

>>105947102
no idea what that means, I just want the evangelicals and nu-puritans to die

i went to a pornographic website the other day and there was a notice that they were just going to straight up block all UK traffic at the top of the page.
good job world leaders i guess?

is the .old bypass gonna be patched out? I really don't want to have to make an account just to access niche porn subreddits.

>>105947191
shit I meant old.

>>105947191
american christian fundamentalists have decided you will no longer be allowed to view gothchicksgonewild without giving Israeli companies your biometric information

>>105911731

>>105947102
Your brain on jewslop media.