Thread 105913390

Meanwhile, Apple Silicon maxes out at the PC's idle power while delivering similar performance.

>>105913390 (OP)
Electricity here is about eight cents per kwh. Why should I care about the difference of 9W to 54W? I'm not running a data center.

>>105913408
30 to 40 Cents/kWh here plusmonthly fees

>>105913408
>energy efficiency is purely a function of economic variables, which can be subject to change at any moment
Even if you are not paying 30-50 cents per kwh, that's still a short sighted argument especially in a time of crisis as this.

>>105913390 (OP)
now lets take a look at a power usage when actually use the machine

>>105913390 (OP)
intel has been lying about power consumption since Sandy Bridge

>>105913390 (OP)
>while delivering similar performance.
And that's where the lie is

>>105913454
Intel has power minimum power, but higher maximum power with current perfotmance segment CPUs. AMD is the reverse due to the less efficient process used for the I/O die, which must use infinity fabric linkd that need constant power.

>>105913408
>Gas here is about eight cents per gallob. Why should I care about the difference of 9MPG to 54MPG? I'm not running a NASCAR race.
>oil crisis inevitably hits and fuel supply runs dry
>eelctricity goes out due to that or a natural disaster
>ACK!

>>105913475
https://youtu.be/jv5wyM2Hp8U
Look at what PC keks need to do in order to match a fraction of their power.

>>105913390 (OP)
>intel chip with a 1/4th of the computing power consumes a 1/4th of electricity
WHO WOULD HAVE EVER GUESSED???????

>>105913475
yeah, it delivers more at lowwr wattage

>Stock settings: 90-110w at 85° with a benchmark score of 11K
>Adjust some variables in bios: 55w steady at 60° with a benchmark score of 14K
I only blame my mobo and its dogshit defaults

>>105913408
battery Life, fan noise, etc

>>105913600
>1/4 the computing power
It's a 13900K.

>>105913449
If it changes enough to matter, you should be more concerned about having guns and ammo. You could run a 54W processor at 100% for an entire year, 24/7, and it would cost $38. If electricity prices went up 10x, that's still only $380/year, but if electricity prices went up 10x, it would be Mad Max chaos. In reality you don't run a cpu at 100% every moment for an entire year.

>>105913390 (OP)
get a toilet currynigger

>>105914377
Personally it just kinda bugs me how inefficient PC stuff can be.
I redid the power supply in my router from an SFX to a picoPSU and dropped 10w.

10w or almost 1/3rd to nothing but inefficiencies

>>105913390 (OP)
yeah i'm not gonna listen to any vid with thumbnails like that

>>105914377
What if I want guns, ammo, and a PC that can run off a generator or solar panel?