Have image formats reached it's peak form?

>>105917394 (OP)
We already have a thread for this you cocksucker motherfucker

>>105916955

>>105917733
>you cocksucker motherfucker
aww shut up! you didn't mean that, sweetie

>>105917805
At least contribute something you feral animal. You're -90 IQ "durrr i know jack shit about tech, here's my take!" threads deserve a paddling desu.

>>105917394 (OP)
JXL + SVG is all we need

>>105917879
you make me blush

>>105918076
whats a jxl?

>>105918097
I'll talk about it in the other thread because this one is more dogshit than the other one.

See >>105916955

>>105918097
new image format. lossless. fastest decode/encode. can construct the original JPG.

>>105919904
>fastest decode
Encode maybe but not decode. It's straight up PISS at decode.

>No source
>Probably a Jewgle graph

into the trash you go

>>105917733
>daiz sperg thread is the same as an actual image codec thread
kys

>>105920006
>"lalalala I can't hear you!"

Meanwhile in the real world: "JPEG XL is used by less than 0.1% of all the websites."

Source: https://w3techs.com/technologies/details/im-xljpeg

Is this really 100% Google's fault? You seriously doubt there were performance problems on like 50% of computer devices with jpeg xl?