4rchive
[
Home
] [
Feed
] [
Search
] [
Report
]
← Home
← Back to /g/
Thread 105917394
12 posts
4 images
/g/
◉
Open Gallery
Anonymous
7/15/2025, 8:41:32 PM
No.105917394
[Report]
>>105917733
>>105918076
file.png
md5: 404e6bc6...
Have image formats reached it's peak form?
Anonymous
7/15/2025, 9:11:27 PM
No.105917733
[Report]
>>105917805
>>105920355
>>105917394 (OP)
We already have a thread for this you cocksucker motherfucker
>>105916955
Anonymous
7/15/2025, 9:17:53 PM
No.105917805
[Report]
>>105917879
>>105917733
>you cocksucker motherfucker
aww shut up! you didn't mean that, sweetie
Anonymous
7/15/2025, 9:25:23 PM
No.105917879
[Report]
>>105918097
>>105917805
At least contribute something you feral animal. You're -90 IQ "durrr i know jack shit about tech, here's my take!" threads deserve a paddling desu.
Anonymous
7/15/2025, 9:45:32 PM
No.105918076
[Report]
>>105918097
>>105917394 (OP)
JXL + SVG is all we need
Anonymous
7/15/2025, 9:47:58 PM
No.105918097
[Report]
>>105918302
>>105919904
>>105917879
you make me blush
>>105918076
whats a jxl?
Anonymous
7/15/2025, 10:09:26 PM
No.105918302
[Report]
>>105918097
I'll talk about it in the other thread because this one is more dogshit than the other one.
See
>>105916955
Anonymous
7/16/2025, 12:39:16 AM
No.105919904
[Report]
>>105919934
>>105918097
new image format. lossless. fastest decode/encode. can construct the original JPG.
Anonymous
7/16/2025, 12:41:34 AM
No.105919934
[Report]
1751401282941318.png
md5: 2577ce80...
>>105919904
>fastest decode
Encode maybe but not decode. It's straight up PISS at decode.
Anonymous
7/16/2025, 12:48:56 AM
No.105920006
[Report]
>>105920619
>No source
>Probably a Jewgle graph
into the trash you go
Anonymous
7/16/2025, 1:24:48 AM
No.105920355
[Report]
>>105917733
>daiz sperg thread is the same as an actual image codec thread
kys
Anonymous
7/16/2025, 1:56:23 AM
No.105920619
[Report]
>>105920006
>"lalalala I can't hear you!"
Meanwhile in the real world: "JPEG XL is used by less than 0.1% of all the websites."
Source:
https://w3techs.com/technologies/details/im-xljpeg
Is this really 100% Google's fault? You seriously doubt there were performance problems on like 50% of computer devices with jpeg xl?
Close ×
<
>