@g is this true?

>>105932265 (OP)

At this point you just pick the less bad. They all suck. Firefox used to be good, inferior, but still good, up to 2014, when SJW took control of Mozilla and turned it into tumblr without child pornography.

>>105932265 (OP)
this board has more garbage posts than literal twitter, congrats

pretty sure lynx doesnt sell your info

>>105932283
How does their staff being cringe on social media effect you?

>>105932265 (OP)
Yes. If you value privacy, don't use computers.

>>105932282
fpbp

librewolf and brave for me

>>105932282
I don't get it. Does twitter account cost $1.27 in India?

>>105932265 (OP)
And how is librewolf not on the left side here? What privacy does it invade?

>>105932265 (OP)
Firefox with modified arkenfox.js

>>105932265 (OP)
Fixed

>>105934554
It's a dumb meme but these posters are making huge money and basically you're a fucking idiot.

Even in death you get data mined now, with autopsies and dna analysis.

>>105932322
Reflects badly on their professionalism and often the quality of their work.

>>105932283
This

>>105932265 (OP)
I use brave

>>105932265 (OP)
that's right, stopping using a browser to access the internet means going out and touching grass

Only terminally online niggers care about that

>>105934636
>The firefox branch downstream of firefox is totally not comped.
arkenfox is still better. Count the number of times it phones home.

>>105936112
arkenfox has safebrowsing on by default, so it does send everything you do to google

Google safebrowsing is one of the largest scams out there, and all the "privacy conscious" people still have it enabled, even thought that it is literally "giving up privacy for security".

They're objectively all shit, you just have to pick your preferred flavor of shit, and keep a vpn on if you know whats good for you. I've been an FF fag for nearly 2 decades at this point. Palemoon in its prime, etc.

Lately just been using ugc and brave since so much modern webshit conflicts with firefox lately.

>>105936880
>all the "privacy conscious" people still have it enabled
I don't. UbO's filters are enough for me

>>105932265 (OP)
This image is a joke or a meme, and it exaggerates for comedic effect. The implication is that all popular browsers are bad for privacy, offering no good choice for those who care about it. However, the reality is more nuanced :
Truth About Browser Privacy:
Most mainstream browsers (Chrome, Edge, Opera) do collect some user data and may not be the best for privacy.
Browsers like Brave, Firefox, and Vivaldi advertise themselves as privacy-focused and include features to block trackers and ads.
Safari (Apple's browser) also implements privacy protections, though it’s deeply tied to Apple’s ecosystem.
Some lesser-known browsers (like Tor Browser) are specifically designed for maximum privacy, but they are not shown in the meme.

In Summary:
The meme is not literally true; some browsers are indeed better for privacy.
If privacy is your top priority, research browsers like Brave, Firefox with privacy add-ons, or Tor Browser, rather than relying on memes for advice.

Would you like specific recommendations for privacy-respecting browsers?

>>105940123
(I first tried just pasting the image and asking "is this true", and gpt4.1 and Claude 4 both got it wrong by insisting there were some browsers listed in the yes branch.
But if I first ask it to describe the contents of the image, and then ask the question, it understands easily.

On the one hand, it's not surprising that more tokens = more reasoning = better answer, that's always been true. On the other hand I thought modern models were supposed to have built-in reasoning messages now rather than needing to DIY it.)

>>105935553
Then I will judge based on the quality of their work.
I don't care if someone slobbed off Hitler.
I don't care if someone is some s/he/it pronouns on xitter.
Death of the author.

>>105932265 (OP)
>tor not even on there
Is there a hidden third option?