>>105958714I'm sorry but this is a bit of a dumb take.
Even if you assume there would be no energy storage in the network, having significant solar would help reduce the load on other sources. Also, it actually is renewable, solar panels can be recycled, so once you build enough capacity, you don't need to mine things again and then throw them out. Batteries are also similar, they can be recycled. I'm hoping this part would address the "but it only works during daytime" part.
To address the "but it requires good climate", it's no doubt feasible in Texas. Texas has a climate that's pretty good for solar.
In my opinion, eventually we will go towards a system that has a priority like: renewables > batteries/hydro > nuclear > backup coal/gas. To completely evolve into this, we need more solar and nuclear. I don't think the current nuclear capacity is enough for Texas.