Thread 105953878

What have you vibe coded today, /gee/?

>>105953878 (OP)
>3MB IMAGE
I'M ON MY LAST 100MB OF LIMITED DATA YOU FUCKING COCKSUCKER

>>105953878 (OP)
regular coder here. How do you guys cope with LLMs trying to tell you what you can or can't vibe code? I have seen a couple of threads where people said that their LLM of choice refused to generate malware for them, but when I replied that they should just ask LLM to fill a hand-coded boilerplate or set of functions, they always replied that they got filteted by that. Are you guys seriously like this?

regular programmer here, does anyone have a good prompt i can start with to understand how to even vibecode? like i legit don't know what to prompt because i usually work out the implementation as i go so i don't have much of a specific to even start with

what the fuck is vibe coding? I've seen this term for months now but I still don't know what it means.

>>105953878 (OP)
I've been trying to reverse engineer a video codec and chatgpt has been surprisingly insightful in helping me understand what the decompiled code is doing. Even vibe coded me some python code to decode the frames.

Is that still a thing?
I thought this meme died already

Won't let this general be a thing
Vibe coding is for bottom of the barrel tards

>>105955546
what's vibe coding

>>105955503
I think there are two definitions of it currently. They both involve telling programming agents (Claud Code, Cursor, whatever) to write code with little to no oversight or review.

Type A vibe coding:
User is an experienced software engineer who would able to write the program themselves and/or would be able to carefully review and amend all AI-generated output. But instead of doing that, they decide to trust the agent and just auto-accept everything. They'll probably at least skim through the code they're generating, keeping an eye out for obvious issues. They'll set up tools like linters and test suites to give some level of reassurance.

Type B vibe coding:
User is not a programmer and would have no chance of writing the program without AI. They have little to no understanding of the generated code. Despite this they are able to build something functional, maybe even useful. High chance of security/correctess/performance issues.

>>105955648
thanks anon
(it's a shitty name)

>>105955648
Are these tools much better than just asking ChatGpt?

>>105956076
Yes. They can inspect the whole project, decide which parts of which files are needed for context, read them, run commands, check for build/lint errors and fix them, etc. All in an automated loop.
(I don't vibe code but I do use these tools to write some parts of my projects at work now. I fully review everything it writes, and usually make some changes or refactor.)

>>105953878 (OP)
I had Gemini abstract repeating inline styles into their own style classes from an HTML file that I just converted from PDF.

>>105955530
It's the future

It is over. Vibe coders won

>>105953878 (OP)
Shut the FUCK up, retard
Stop glorifying ignorance and laziness