How do urbanites live in current year without being part of an ecosystem?

Brand loyalty is stupid. intentionally locking yourself into a brand, which you do by using Apple products, is next level stupid. Every corporation you interact with would sell your soul and the souls of your family and friends for half a penny if they could.

It's all the same. I don't need to spend more money and lie to myself about it making my life better.

>>105956374 (OP)
I'm part of an ecosystem, the one created by GOD

>>105958293
It's cute you think that way.. How about obeying God when it comes to the prohibition of making and sharing images of living things?

>>105958609
I said GOD, as in the creator of this universe, not the desert religion character

>>105956374 (OP)
>e-waste HP refurbished laptop for work
>Xiaomi Note 13 on Graphene OS
>W10 LTSC gayming PC
>Xiaomi Band 7

>>105958866
There is no God. You have no creator and there is no creator of the Universe. There is no meaning or cause to things. All religion is cope to avoid facing this fact.

>>105956374 (OP)
>MacBook Air + PS5

Why does this combo scare the gaymers of /g/ so much?

Subtle glowie data mining thread. Reminder to post wrong data to confuse Palantirs AI surveillance bot monitoring.

>>105958897
Sure things just arise spontaneously and secularism is the best and we trust our institutions and science, am I right fellow redditors???

>>105958897
>there is no meaning
I pity you.

>>105958866
Ah, so you meant your DESIRES. Should've said it out loud sooner.
Making images of living things is forbidden for Jews, Christians, and Muslims.
That your belief allows it could very well mean you are a low IQ idol worshiper aka worshiper of your desires.
>>105959144
That people take science as the act of being above the world instead of the act of STUDYING the world we are so ignorant of can be easily blamed on broken school systems and spineless religious people.
To take theories and hearsay from so called scientists and firmly believe in them again implies that people aren't using their brains.
I cringe every time I hear a pseud confidently saying things about the start of the universe or birth of man - did you witness it? Do you have evidence? No, you have "missing links" and a standard model of cosmology that is up to debate.
It worries me that people suck up "big bang" and then still swallow "Andromeda will hit us in X years" umm, saar, so there is no center point? And recent findings suggest alternative to Darth Vader energy?

>>105959322
Here's a different way to word it.
You're not commanded to do anything or told live your life in any specific way. You can just live however you want without worrying about an omnipotent being breathing down your throat looking for any reason to torture you forever.

>>105956374 (OP)
You will never be happy, give up.

>>105959582
Again, I believe on the creator of desires and everything else, not on the desert religions
You swallow ancient rules made for different people like they suck up the big bang

>>105959766
>You're not commanded to do anything or told live your life in any specific way.
Sure you are. The evidence is with whomever said he has revelation from God and proves it.
Please answer truthfully (to yourself, as I don't care): Have you ever looked up Sodom? Do you not find an example in them?
If you claim everything came out of nothing, then how can the Earth around you be the way it is?
Meticulously designed such that everything relies on the materials of earth plus water.
Water being of such a structure that it is suitable to form a solution with minerals, salts, and sugar - enabling you to hydrate from fresh juice and energy drinks.
Water of specific molecular weight that it freely escapes water surface and forms clouds at our earth temps.
Have you ever thought what would happen if water molecules were a bit lighter? If their bond strength and surface tension were any different?
It would mean total collapse of life.
This is just water. Which you never looked at with marvel or with reverence towards its creator.
>You can just live however you want
I mean, you certainly can in this life. What about the eternal one? I like eating barbecue, not being barbecue.

>>105958897
>>105959766
I said that there's a God, not that there's an abrahamic God
Look away from religions created in places filled with suffering and envy, and you will find a benevolent Creator

>>105959894
> I believe on the creator of desires and everything else,
That's cute. Worshiping the creator of everything is natural and at least puts you above millions of low IQ people across history for example those that worship things like the God of Indian Visa (not a joke)
Unfortunately saying you believe is not enough. What is your god like? How does he describe himself? What does he preach? Why did make us? etc. obvious questions that need answers.
Indians believe in Brahman, the ultimate being.
Again, unfortunately, he is actually three: Brahma, Vishnu, and Shiva
Again, unfortunately, an avatar of one them turned into a female and the male version lusted after her.
That is not a god I would believe in. Would you?
So, again, what is your God, his attributes, his instructions?

>>105960034
His instructions are everywhere around you, and he doesn't have attributes, the attributes that have him
All stories are ways of describing an aspect or another of reality, I would believe a god who told the desert dwellers to be more prude, or told interesting stories to the hindus, but I wouldn't be bound to the story
You won't have George Washington by compiling all stories about him, what makes you think you will have God through them?

>>105960027
>Look away from religions created in places filled with suffering and envy
That's your criteria for a religion? You do realize that "abrahamic" (they don't call themselves that, and the message was there BEFORE Abraham) religions have messengers that come to help people when they stray?
Where in the world is a place without suffering and envy? Are you mad? Would such a religion even be revealed on earth? To suffering people?
>>105960070
>His instructions are everywhere around you,
AKA your whims, desires, and society.
> he doesn't have attributes,
So he doesn't exist
>the attributes that have him
huh?
> I would believe a god who told the desert dwellers to be more prude, or told interesting stories to the hindus,
So you believe in multiple Gods.
Your 'original' God in previous posts doesn't have anything to say about himself. He can't even speak according to you. Has no instructions. Doesn't guide people. Doesn't like places of suffering.
You worship a wrathful, yet non-existing god then you switched to polytheism.

>>105959894
>You swallow ancient rules made for different people like they suck up the big bang
Whatever God commands is guidance for the betterment of people and would only be changed by God himself. It is funny that your example has already been called out in the Quran "When Our Verses are recited to him, he says: “Tales of the men of old!”

>>105960110
>So he doesn't exist
>huh?
He's the source of existence itself
>So you believe in multiple Gods.
There's one united states, for some is a vengeful country, for others is a bastion of freedom, for others is the root of all evil
These are all fantasies created by language because people don't know how to explain something they don't comprehend, like the of vastness a country over the years
What makes you think the Creator is easily explainable?
>Has no instructions. Doesn't guide people
What is nature?
>Doesn't like places of suffering.
The places of suffering that makes him a vengeful god that kills the people they are envious of

>>105960257
>because people don't know how to explain something they don't comprehend,
We don't have to comprehend God to acknowledge and worship him it simply is not possible for a creature to understand the creator.
What we can do is believe in what God TOLD US about himself. That He is above His throne. That His mercy prevails over His wrath and so on.
>What makes you think the Creator is easily explainable?
Not explainable, but can be described. Saying the creator of all things is one description/attribute, but you then said he doesn't have attributes.
God is not the author of confusion. Would you at least agree on that?
Who other than you worship the creator in your way?
You are confusing yourself. You have no moral compass. You accept what society does at any point in time with no frame of reference.
>What is nature?
What's that supposed to mean? Do you think it's natural to post tranime and goon material here? Does your God (desires) say it's OK or not?
You do realize the 41% is not a joke, right? People die because of degeneracy. Is your God fine with people being degens?
>The places of suffering that makes him a vengeful god that kills the people they are envious of
Please explain and elaborate. Does you God have any instructions at all?

In your imaginary religion.

>>105960334
Were you there when your god told you?
Or you just believe someone else who said that this was his words?

>Saying the creator of all things is one description/attribute
Is a direction. He has all the attributes, but I choose this one to tell you about it
>God is not the author of confusion. Would you at least agree on that?
He is the author of confusion
>Who other than you worship the creator in your way?
I don't know
>You have no moral compass. You accept what society does at any point in time with no frame of reference.
I have moral compass, but this is irrelevant to the discussion
>Do you think it's natural to post tranime and goon material here?
Yes, for they have given the free will to do it
>Does you God have any instructions at all?
It's your Will, it's my Will, it's the Will of the whole

>itoddler thread derailed by /x/+/his/ schizos
Kek, based.

>>105960392
>Or you just believe someone else who said that this was his words?
Nope. There needs to be miracles, for there to be no contradictions, and for an authentic transmission chain.
>He has all the attributes,
So your god needs to go to the bathroom? He is as weak as a newborn?
Whatever happened to your god not having any attributes?
>He is the author of confusion
You are confused indeed. Please stop following your desires.
>I have moral compass, but this is irrelevant to the discussion
It is very relevant. God's commands are the moral compass. None is more worthy than the creator of dictating what is right and what is wrong.
>Yes, for they have given the free will to do it
>It's your Will, it's my Will, it's the Will of the whole
You responded with "What is nature?" when I asked about your god's guidance and now every Will.
So anything man can do, is guided and accepted by your god? So much for you having a moral compass I guess.
Again, please stop worshiping your desires and claiming them to be God.
Even some false religions teach suppressing your whims and desires and doing good.
This life is merely a test. Every good and bad deed is recorded and the mercy of God is what we rely on to gain eternal reward.
To put your desires on such a high pedestal is an insult to the Creator, who already sent guidance.

>>105960477
He has all attributes and have none, for he's the source of them and can enter his creation at all
He can be as weak as a newborn, and powerful as lightning
Or be beyond the idea of power completely

Desires are a part of his creation, they are the manifestation of Will
You follow not the words of God, eternal and silent, but the words of Mohammed
I tried to make you understand, but it seems you are bounded by your cultural roots

>>105960034
>the God of Indian Visa
>The "Visa God" is a colloquial name given to the Chilkur Balaji Temple in Hyderabad, India, particularly by those seeking visa approvals, especially for travel to the United States.
Would a nuke vaporize the shit or make the shit vapor cross oceans into my lungs?

>>105960520
creation at will*

>>105956374 (OP)
what the fuuuck
euro-urbanite here
your op is for nerds

>>105960520
I hate to break it to you, but I dragged your god across the floor while he was in a weak state.
Your god is no more.

>>105960535
Many people have done this, as he's the aggressor and the victim
I was foolish to believe you were discussing in good intent, or would believe something deeper than desert kings

>>105960521
I am against mass murder, but I guess the area hit by the nuke would be vaporized and the nuclear outburst would blow the surrounding shit a good distance, but unlikely across oceans.

>>105960459
I feel bad for having criticized the Americans so much, after noticing that part of the anti-anime drama comes from Muslims thanks to the British importing a million of them every year

>>105960553
You consider your belief "deep"? You literally made things up as you post evident in your contradictions. Please wake up.
You are not "deep". You are misguided and rejecting the truth in favor of desires. You can't dress this up as divine.

>>105960585
Apparently, you don't have to feel sad, since your god both likes and dislikes anime. Both the tranny and the rope according to >>105960553.

>>105960588
The mysteries behind your religion comes from Christianity, that comes from the Hebrews, that comes from Egypt, that comes from beyond this epoch
Do not preach something you don't comprehend

>>105960599
Yes anon, seems like you can comprehend things when you want

>>105960674
We both have miracles and logic as evidence to our path to truth.
You say our religion cames from Christianity, which means you are ignorant or lying. I presume it is the former for obvious reasons.
Book-wise, the bible has contradictions, meaning its not from god.
I already told you we need miracles, no contradictions, and authentic transmission chain.
So we don't take a careful spoonful of soup mixed with poison and expect a hearty meal.
To take from the book means to inherit its mistakes, which we don't have.
e.g. calling the soveriegn of egypt pharao in times of Joseph when its supposed to be King.
e.g. God arguing with rabbis or wrestling with a prophet and then losing.
We have clear basis for everything so as to not be confused and God does not want us to be confused.
People-wise your claim is ridiculous since we don't believe in a triune God.
To say we don't comprehend something because it's got old roots is simply laughable since we believe people have submitted to god since Adam, the first human.
To claim we don't understand when our book, the word of God, clearly describes the subject is ignorance on your part.

It is you who doesn't comprehend and instead resort to "desert god" and not wanting a "religion of suffering people" to cover up your lack of interest in following anything other than your desires.

You example, is, once again, mentioned in the Quran, "They said, ‘Shall we believe in you when it is the most despised who follow you?"

>>105961034
Every religion has miracles, and every religion will consider divergences a contradiction
Because the real God is not bounded by culture, he does not ask names to be present in all things
Mankind comes from a time way before what you call "Adam", your religion is but a fragment of a bigger truth

Answering your original question because this is a waste of time, I'm not under the jurisdiction of the >>105958609 rule. Follow it if you like it, but do not preach it to the unwilling
This is not a site of Muslim culture

>>105962548
>divergences
I showed a historical inaccuracy. It's not a matter of debate anymore. It's also very easy to show number inconsistencies e.g. Ahazaih was X when he rules over Jerusalem where X was both 22 and 42
That is not up to debate and even christian scholars acknowledge errors in the bible and corruption in instances like the story of the woman caught in adultery
>Mankind comes from a time way before what you call "Adam"
What we call Adam is THE first human.
To say mankind was before him is just shitflinging on your part.
>I'm not under the jurisdiction of the
I felt like you are since you said the creator of all and I sought to guide you.
Since you only follow desires and human whims, you feel that you aren't.
>preach to the unwilling
You can disengage whenever you want. I don't think I was forcing you to obey.. rather, I wanted to find out what belief system (of having THE creator God) was since I like to see what truths lie therein. You obviously kept replying, which implies consent to converse. No?
>This is not a site of Muslim culture
You are the one that felt the need to mention God the creator of all on a non-religious website in a board about technology in a thread about ecosystems.
I felt it upon me to speak a reminder (valid for many religions even hindus believe it or not) because the Quran says "For certainly reminders benefit the believers"
As far as this site goes, they have no problem hosting plenty of cultures so don't go raving about a few islamic posts.

What's an "ecosystem"?
I have a desktop computer and thats it
Well and a server since they don't want you to have a usable amount of local storage anymore.
PS5 has no games

>>105959071
PS5 has no games