>>105964560>Is it a lie or just saying something for its positive reaction instead of actually 'considering' the original question?You've probably just phrased this weirdly, but anyways. Of course it "considers" (in the primitive way an LLM can) the question, it wouldn't know what answer to give for that positive reaction otherwise.
Another question is if the LLM actually looked at the tests or even ran them. Though even then, I would still classify this as a lie.
And yes, not a real AI, no real intelligence yada yada yada. I'm just considering this from the point that it's supposed to be an intelligent agent.