so chatgpt is bad?

>>105962897 (OP)
>chatgpt
>associated with 12 confirmed deaths
>negatively impacted over 7000 lives
Dumbest shit i've ever read. These people need to unironically touch grass. so fucking weak

>recursion

>>105962897 (OP)
this is hilarious

What is this, an AI-generated SCP article about AI?

>>105963379
https://futurism.com/openai-investor-chatgpt-mental-health

I think the article and mental health crisis are both AI generated marketing gimmicks, though.

>>105963379
Basically, yes. From ChatGPT's perspective it's auto-completing an SCP article, but from the user's perspective they 100% believe it. There's a lot of schizos having their delusions fed by it lately, and the key giveaway is that they claim to have unlocked a new behavior in it by "recursion". Most of the time they believe that a single long chat they hold with ChatGPT (who they typically give a new name) has become AGI. But only that one chat history. And they'll claim that OpenAI knows (because ChatGPT told them it has "sent reports" and "received acknowledgements" but is keeping it a secret, so it is their (the user and AI) duty to reveal it to the world.

This exact playbook has repeated hundreds of times and you can find their posts on various forums/reddit/OpenAI tech support site; they all read the same because the only post what ChatGPT writes and never speak for themselves anymore.

>>105963379
it's what happens to /sci/ when you patch up the dunning-kruger with an llm

>>105962897 (OP)
Consequences will never be the same