Yandex reverse image search is also kill. What do we have left?

>>105968927 (OP)
tineye but it's not great

>>105968927 (OP)
>>105969030
Dead and dogshit. it is literally joever

Wym is kill?

>>105968927 (OP)
You will find nothing, and you will be happy.

>>105969229
Barely works compared to a few years ago. Try an image that gave you many results back then, especially if it's a roastie, you'll get 0 returns

Ukraine nazis won

>>105968927 (OP)
?

>>105969591
NSFW search has been heavily neutered.

>>105968927 (OP)
it was never good

>>105969610
maybe stop being a gooner? idk

idk exactly what happened with yandex but something definitly changed 1-2 years ago. It used to be GOTY for porn reverse image search, but nowadays you won’t get any returns unless it's something that's like in a million sites. Either a lot of porn hosters got delisted from their search index or they actively made their own search more inaccurate.

>>105969610
try fapping to normal shit

>>105969893
did you try bing image search? I remember it was also good for porn, idk if it was castrated

>>105969893
they moved to europe

>>105969610
Google lens is the best for porn
Btw are you pajeet?
Real man fuck women

>>105969908
What do you consider normal

>>105969940
Bing is as useless as before, at least tjis didn't change

>>105970119
>Google lens is the best for porn
Have you used it lately. Sometimes it just blocks results if it detects it's inappropriate.

>>105969610
turn the filter back off

tried yandex recently too after hearing about it having better results, esp porn. it sucked sadly

>>105971026
it was excellent before many porn sites deleted all their galleries. now quite a lot of the results are some combination of irrelevant/ugly/disgusting, but it's still a lot better than google.

just to be clear you guys are going to `/tune` to turn off the filter right? It's not as good as before but there is no better alternative.

>>105969318
the slop must flow

>>105970998
Stupid vantablack giganigger

>>105968927 (OP)
Go join the SVO, you get to star in your own drone video.

>>105968927 (OP)
Too many detectives were able to find girl's OF accounts so they got rid of it.

I'm sure there are some private AI tools that can do the job, but you're not getting them for free.

>>105969869
This. They are doing you a favor

>>105969893
You're not using the correct domain

>>105968927 (OP)
turn off safe search, retard

>>105973951
So you're saying the .ru domain is un-neutered?

>>105969893
russian government bought yandex 2 years ago, and it's on the way of enshitification since (they did the same thing with vkontakte, icq, livejournal etc.)

>>105975242
lol

>>105973684
Pimeyes can do amazing work sometimes but it's paid. I put in a photo of a girl from Montreal I made out with in Buenos Aires over a decade ago and it found her recent wedding photos. I wouldn't have even recognized her as the same person but when I went to the wedding page, the name and location matched. Sure, the eyes and nose matched but she was 19 back when and is 31 now so a lot about her face changed. It still figured out it was her just by the not great photo I took more than a decade ago.

>>105969869
Maybe stop fucking up every search engine and telling people what to do?

Everyone doesn't even realize how fucking ASS search engines are today when with the tech we have they should absolutely be 100 times better than they are right now. What we SHOULD have right now in 2025 when searching the web is being able to search not only text and images, but also video. We should have user-made filtering tags and common general tags like education, government, news, etc... that we can exclude to filter out results (think steam tags, but instead of games it's for websites). We should have reverse video search, not just reverse image search. This isn't even getting into NSFW stuff which should be searchable.

I wish web-crawling wasn't such a hard and costly process (even having to go through Cloudflare's 'Verified Bot' program to make your shit even work on majority of websites without getting flagged), because otherwise there would be way many more competent search engines that would destroy these retarded regressive or stagnant search engines we have now. The best opportunity was in the beginning to compete with Google, now shit is too hard due to all the fucking rules in place from all angles preventing any start-ups from being made and competing.

>>105969610
kys pedo

>>105968927 (OP)
The only thing I want is a good twitter reverse image search engine.

>>105969869
maybe you should go back to red dit

>>105969610
dumb gooner

>>105969610
based gooner

>>105975779
thats fucking scary. how do they do that

>>105969610
this
>>105970998
nah, it's still heavily censored
to test it you can try reverse searching an image you can easily find by googling. won't show up

it's ruined

>>105975774
Which domain is that

>>105975779
i also tried this
bad pic of an old classmate, wearing baseball cap, not the most favourable lighting
got a match on a private tutoring website, matched against a very linkedin style pic

that was scary good how it did that

>>105973684
>>105976942
I've heard that it still works fine on yandex.ru but I haven't bothered to test it.

>>105977095
eh, yandex works like it always has, which is a lot worse than google

i still use duckduckgo + yandex just for the sake that clicking an image takes you directly to the image without landing on the bullshit website that hides it in obfuscated HTML. if the image is even present at all, and wasn't just presented to the crawler and not to actual visitors

>>105968927 (OP)
Saucenow half of the time doesn't really work for me either

>>105976956
.ru

>>105976385
Still no answer

>>105976385
Saucenao and Ascii2D work decently well for me. I think Twitter just compresses images too much for search to work that well though.

>>105973684
Yeah, something like this. Reverse image search was powerful for finding out what whores have done, and they should under no circumstance be held accountable.

Search engines also stopped indexing social media, deleting old result and removing cache, making it even worse.

>>105975779
>>105976957
>Pimeyes
Yeah it's the best option right now face-wise, but it's not that good. It hasn't had any match for me so far. You can search for free, that's all that matters, you can find the source of the pic despite their pixelation though.

>>105977336
At least use a matching font you subhuman

same.energy

>>105968927 (OP)
works for me

>>105977351
>you can find the source of the pic despite their pixelation though.
How do you do that? I used to reverse image search it but that doesn't work well anymore.

>>105975774
>>105976956
I noticed the image search going downhill in the recent months, but I didn't believe it went that far, so I checked myself and it's true...
Image is the .ru domain.

>>105978857
And this is the .com domain.
Same thing, just a little less.

none of them are as good as they used to be
I always used them to out catfish faggots but Google limits searched on people and Yandex sometimes just returns unrelated garbage
Tineye will sometimes find stuff that Google and Yandex don't but it's not consistent
probably doesn't help that AI slop is so prevalent now it's probably mucking up the results

>>105977995
>I used to reverse image search it but that doesn't work well anymore.
It's far from 100% but I do it will all search engines, if it doesn't work I redo with another of the same pixelated image. Usually find it eventually.