>>105976558>>105976414Bubble aren’t even real.
They’re always created by central banks.
>>105976578>dotcom bubble.Classic example of an artificial bubble.
Alan Greenspan (FED chair) was literally shilling dot-com stocks on prime television.
Then when he felt the bubble had peaked enough he raised interest rates to pop it, though shills of the era insisted he wasn’t manipulating nuffin’.
The point of why they’d do this is the web was too decentralized. They wanted to kill off competitors and consolidate into the chosen few companies like google and amazon.
As for the current AI bubble?
It will not pop unless the FED wants it to, end of discussion.
The reason you’d pop a bubble is two possible reasons; 1. Using the crisis to push through policy changes you want. 2. You shake down the market to get the results you want.
I just don’t see any of those reasons playing out for the FED at the moment.
Policy is in the hands of the Trump admin, who might not listen to their suggestions, or worse fuck them over for their own reasons.
The AI market is already heavily consolidated to the point these big-tech fags are kicking around billions at the same few employees out of boredom.
So what would be the point of the FED disrupting its favorite pet companies by popping the bubble?
No i think this bubble will go on for a looong time.
And /g/ will whine and moan and not get it until they realize all bubbles are fake and gay,